Even with D129349 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129349>, various SPARC JIT
tests still `FAIL`.  They are guarded by `host-supports-jit`.  This is set
from `clang-repl --host-supports-jit` which still returns `true`.  It turns
out the `JITTargetMachineBuilder` doesn't consider `hasJIT` at all.

This patch corrects this, turning the affected tests `UNSUPPORTED`.

Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129350

Until D118450 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D118450> lands, there's no JIT
support on SPARC, but the backend claims otherwise, leading to various
testsuite failures.

This patch corrects this.

Tested on `sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129349

Print the enum values and their description in the help output for
argument values. Until now, there was no way to get these values and
their description.

Example output:

(lldb) help <description-verbosity>
  <description-verbosity> -- How verbose the output of 'po' should be.

     compact : Only show the description string
     full    : Show the full output, including persistent variable's
               name and type

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129707

Refactor the command option enum values and the command argument table
to connect the two. This has two benefits:

 - We guarantee that two options that use the same argument type have
   the same accepted values.
 - We can print the enum values and their description in the help
   output. (D129707)

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129703

This reverts commit 7c51f02e because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.

Add weak definitions for the load/store callbacks.

This matches the weak definitions for all other SanitizerCoverage
callbacks.

Reviewed By: vitalybuka

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129801

Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374

This is an alternative to D129154. See discussions on https://discourse.llvm.org/t/fast-scalar-fsqrt-tuning-in-x86/63605

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129647

Rewrite a prebuilt file removed by D129728.

Prefer to use SLLI instead of zext.w/zext.h in more cases. SLLI
might be better for compression.

We previously support split jump table, where some jump table entries
target different fragments of same function. In this fix, we provide
support for another type of intra-indirect transfer: landing pad.

When C++ exception handling is used, compiler emits .gcc_except_table
that describes the location of catch block (landing pad) for specific
range that potentially invokes a throw(). Normally landing pads reside
in the function, but with -fsplit-machine-functions, landing pads can
be moved to another fragment. The intuition is, landing pads are rarely
executed, so compiler can move them to .cold section.

This update will mark all fragments that have landing pad to another
fragment as non-simple, and later propagate non-simple to all related
fragments.

This update also includes one manual test case: split-landing-pad.s

Reviewed By: Amir

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128561

It requires !zlib and isn't so useful.

zext.w requires Zba not Zbb. The test was also wrong, but had the
correct comment.

Fixing the idiv-licm.ll test failure

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129819

clang 14 removed -gz=zlib-gnu and ld.lld/llvm-objcopy removed .zdebug support
recently. llvm-dwp currently doesn't support SHF_COMPRESSED. Add support and
remove .zdebug support.

Simplify llvm::object::Decompressor which has no .zdebug user now.

While here, add tests for ELF32LE, ELF32BE, and ELF64BE.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129728

If we have a variable shift amount and the demanded mask has leading
zeros, we can propagate those leading zeros to not demand those bits
from operand 0. This can allow zero_extend/sign_extend to become
any_extend. This pattern can occur due to C integer promotion rules.

This transform is already done by InstCombineSimplifyDemanded.cpp where
sign_extend can be turned into zero_extend for example.

Reviewed By: spatel, foad

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121833

AcceptedPublic

Currently CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator() does not look though type
sugar and so if the parameter is a type alias it will not be able to detect
that the method is a move assignment operator. This PR fixes that and adds a set
of tests that covers that we correctly detect special member functions when
defaulting or deleting them.

This fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56456

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129591

* Adds verifiers for `nvgpu.ldmatrix` op
* Adds tests to `mlir/test/Dialect/NVGPU/invalid.mlir`

Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129669

The feature's been removed from most other tools in LLVM at this point.

When removing an r_brace that is the first token of an annotated line, if the
line above ends with a line comment, clang-format generates invalid code by
merging the tokens after the r_brace into the line comment.

Fixes #56488.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129742

Fixed some new memory leaks after migration to new
bufferization. One is expected, the other may need
some more careful analysis.

Reviewed By: jpienaar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129805

Since the divergence-driven instruction selection has been enabled for AMDGPU,
 all the uniform instructions are expected to be selected to SALU form, except those not having one.
 VGPR to SGPR copies appear in MIR to connect values producers and consumers. This change implements an algorithm
 that evolves a reasonable tradeoff between the profit achieved from keeping the uniform instructions in SALU form
 and overhead introduced by the data transfer between the VGPRs and SGPRs.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128252

-fembed-bitcode will put bitcode into special sections within object
files, but this is not meant to be used by LTO, so the gold plugin
should ignore it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/47216

Reviewed By: tejohnson, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116995

This reverts commit d2460d90.

Reverting this commit because after pushing to main it caused
unexpected test failures.

Introducing the support for evaluating the constructor
of every element in an array. The idea is to record the
index of the current array member being constructed and
create a loop during the analysis. We looping over the
same CXXConstructExpr as many times as many elements
the array has.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127973

Try the shared library first, and if it doesn't exist fallback onto
the static one. When the static library is requested, skip the shared
library.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129470

On my system the date formatting is a bit different from what the test used to
support. I'm using:

  Windows 11 version 21H2, build 22000.795 using the English(Canada) region.
  ls from BusyBox 1.36
  VS 2022 17.2.5
  WinSDK 10.0.22000

After recent bufferization improvement, this test
started failing due to missed zero initialization.

Reviewed By: jpienaar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129800

Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129772

Add the collective subroutine, co_sum, to the list of intrinsics.
In accordance with 16.9.50 and 16.9.137, add a check for and an
error if coindexed objects are being passed to certain arguments
in co_sum and in move_alloc. Add a semantics test to check that
this error is successfully caught in calls to move_alloc. Remove
the XFAIL directive, update the ERROR directives and add both
standard-conforming and non-standard conforming calls to the
semantics test for co_sum.

Reviewed By: jeanPerier

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114134