This CL allows asan allocator in fuchsia to decommit shadow memory
for memory allocated using mmap.

Big allocations in asan end up being allocated via `mmap` and freed with
`munmap`. However, when that memory is freed, asan returns the
corresponding shadow memory back to the OS via a call to
`ReleaseMemoryPagesToOs`.

In fuchsia, `ReleaseMemoryPagesToOs` is a no-op: to be able to free
memory back to the OS, you have to hold a handle to the vmo you want to
modify, which is tricky at the ReleaseMemoryPagesToOs level as that
function is not exclusively used for shadow memory.

The function `__sanitizer_fill_shadow` fills a given shadow memory range
with a specific value, and if that value is 0 (unpoison) and the memory
range is bigger than a threshold parameter, it will decommit that memory
if it is all zeroes.

This CL modifies the `FlushUnneededASanShadowMemory` function in
`asan_poisoning.cpp` to add a call to `__sanitizer_fill_shadow` with
value and threshold = 0. This way, all the unneeded shadow memory gets
returned back to the OS.

A test for this behavior can be found in fxrev.dev/391974

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80355

Change-Id: Id6dd85693e78a222f0329d5b2201e0da753e01c0

`Metadata` is being changed from an `llvm::Any` to a `MatchConsumer<llvm::Any>`
so that it's evaluation can be be dependent on on `MatchResult`s passed in.

Reviewed By: ymandel, gribozavr2

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83820

This reverts commit d4020ef7. It broke
LLDB buildbot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x64-windows-ninja/builds/17702.

... on systems where wait() isn't one of the declarations transitively included
via unistd.h (i.e. Darwin).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84207

Introduces the scatter/gather operations to the Vector dialect
(important memory operations for sparse computations), together
with a first reference implementation that lowers to the LLVM IR
dialect to enable running on CPU (and other targets that support
the corresponding LLVM IR intrinsics).

The operations can be used directly where applicable, or can be used
during progressively lowering to bring other memory operations closer to
hardware ISA support for a gather/scatter. The semantics of the operation
closely correspond to those of the corresponding llvm intrinsics.

Note that the operation allows for a dynamic index vector (which is
important for sparse computations). However, this first reference
lowering implementation "serializes" the address computation when
base + index_vector is converted to a vector of pointers. Exploring
how to use SIMD properly during these step is TBD. More general
memrefs and idiomatic versions of striding are also TBD.

Reviewed By: arpith-jacob

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84039

Updated the tests to use -mcpu=pwr10 instead of -mcpu=future.
Updated the tests to include Big Endian testing.

My previous commit added the default arguments but didn't use them in
the member initialization list...

This reverts commit 5b0de575.

Apparently that caused some test to get stuck on Linuxx. Reverting for now.

Outside of compiler-rt (where it's arguably an anti-pattern too),
LLVM tries to keep its build files as simple as possible. See e.g.
llvm/docs/SupportLibrary.rst, "Code Organization".

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84243

OptNoneInstrumentation is part of StandardInstrumentations. It skips
functions (or loops) that are marked optnone.

The feature of skipping optional passes for optnone functions under NPM
is gated on a -enable-npm-optnone flag. Currently it is by default
false. That is because we still need to mark all required passes to be
required. Otherwise optnone functions will start having incorrect
semantics.  After that is done in following changes, we can remove the
flag and always enable this.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83519

By using default arguments the caller can specify a subset without the
need for overloads. This is particularly useful in combination with
emplace_back as these objects are generally stored in a vector.

Summary:

FormattersContainer stores LLDB's formatters. It's implemented as a templated
map-like data structures that supports any kind of value type and only allows
ConstString and RegularExpression as the key types. The keys are used for
matching type names (e.g., the ConstString key `std::vector` matches the type
with the same name while RegularExpression keys match any type where the
RegularExpression instance matches).

The fact that a single FormattersContainer can only match either by string
comparison or regex matching (depending on the KeyType) causes us to always have
two FormatterContainer instances in all the formatting code. This also leads to
us having every type name matching logic in LLDB twice. For example,
TypeCategory has to implement every method twice (one string matching one, one
regex matching one).

This patch changes FormattersContainer to instead have a single `TypeMatcher`
key that wraps the logic for string-based and regex-based type matching and is
now the only possible KeyType for the FormattersContainer. This means that a
single FormattersContainer can now match types with both regex and string
comparison.

To summarize the changes in this patch:
* Remove all the `*_Impl` methods from `FormattersContainer`
* Instead call the FormatMap functions from `FormattersContainer` with a
  `TypeMatcher` type that does the respective matching.
* Replace `ConstString` with `TypeMatcher` in the few places that directly
  interact with `FormattersContainer`.

I'm working on some follow up patches that I split up because they deserve their
own review:

* Unify FormatMap and FormattersContainer (they are nearly identical now).
* Delete the duplicated half of all the type matching code that can now use one
  interface.
* Propagate TypeMatcher through all the formatter code interfaces instead of
  always offering two functions for everything.

There is one ugly design part that I couldn't get rid of yet and that is that we
have to support getting back the string used to construct a `TypeMatcher` later
on. The reason for this is that LLDB only supports referencing existing type
matchers by just typing their respective input string again (without even
supplying if it's a regex or not).

Reviewers: davide, mib

Reviewed By: mib

Subscribers: mgorny, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84151

This avoids massive warning spam due to the unit tests' use of gtest and gmock, which do not use the 'override' keyword in their sources.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84213

Reviewed By: ftynse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84216

RecordInterestingDirectory was added to collect dSYM bundles and their
content. For the current working directory we only want the directory to
be part of the VFS, not necessarily its contents. This patch renames the
current method to RecordInterestingDirectoryRecursively and adds a new
one that's not recursive.

Summary:
This patch adds the ability to peel off iterations of the first loop in loop
fusion. This can allow for both loops to have the same trip count, making it
legal for them to be fused together.

Here is a simple scenario peeling can be used in loop fusion:

for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
  a[i] = a[i] + 3;
for (j = 1; j < 10; ++j)
  b[j] = b[j] + 5;

Here is we can make use of peeling, and then fuse the two loops together. We can
peel off the 0th iteration of the loop i, and then combine loop i and j for
i = 1 to 10.

a[0] = a[0] +3;
for (i = 1; i < 10; ++i) {
  a[i] = a[i] + 3;
  b[i] = b[i] + 5;
}

Currently peeling with loop fusion is only supported for loops with constant
trip counts and a single exit point. Both unguarded and guarded loops are
supported.

Author: sidbav (Sidharth Baveja)

Reviewers: kbarton, Meinersbur, bkramer, Whitney, skatkov, ashlykov, fhahn, bmahjour

Reviewed By: bmahjour

Subscribers: bmahjour, mgorny, hiraditya, zzheng

Tags: LLVM

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82927

Fixes typo for strstr in entrypoints.
str -> src.

* If two group members are combined, we should leave just one index in the SHT_GROUP content.
* If a group member is discarded (/DISCARD/ or upcoming -r --gc-sections combination),
  we should drop its index in the SHT_GROUP content. LLD currently crashes (`getOutputSection()` is null).

Reviewed By: psmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84129

Reviewed By: sivachandra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83956

Summary:
The purpose of this change is to do a small refactoring of code in
ASTImporterTest.cpp by moving it to ASTImporterFixtures.h in order to
support tests of downstream custom types and minimize the "living
downstream burden" of frequent integrations from community to a
downstream repo that implements custom AST import tests.

Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik

Reviewed By: martong

Subscribers: balazske, dkrupp, bjope, rnkovacs, teemperor, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83970

[llvm-readobj] Construct relocation-aware DWARFDataExtractor to decode .eh_frame addresses correctly

In an object file, a "PC Begin" field in a FDE is usually relocated by a
PC-relative relocation. Use a relocation-aware DWARFDataExtractor overload (with
DWARFContext and a reference to its internal .eh_frame representation) to decode
addresses correctly. In an object file, most sections have addresses of zero. So
the displayed addresses are almost always offsets relative to the start of the
associated text section.

DWARFContext::create handles .eh_frame and .rela.eh_frame by itself, so if there
are more than one .eh_frame (technically possible, but almost always erronerous
in practice), this will only handle the first one.  Supporting multiple
.eh_frame is beyond the scope of this patch.

Reviewed By: grimar, jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84106

Following tests were disabled for clang-11 after upgrading to
version 5.0 in D82963:

1. openmp/runtime/test/env/kmp_set_dispatch_buf.c
2. openmp/runtime/test/worksharing/for/kmp_set_dispatch_buf.c

They are also failing for clang-12. Thus this temporary disabling
until they are fixed.

Reviewed By: ABataev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84241

This is a necessary cleanup after having expanded a SCEV.

See: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84071#inline-774728

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84174

Being "precise" here is getting us into trouble with one of the
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS buildbots, see [1].  Rather than reporting IR additions that
later get rolled back as "no change", instead we now conservatively report that
there was.

1: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143509.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84071

Note: Resubmission with frame pointers force-enabled to fix builds with
-DCOMPILER_RT_BUILD_BUILTINS=False

Summary:
Splits the unwinder into a non-segv (for allocation/deallocation traces) and a
segv unwinder. This ensures that implementations can select an accurate, slower
unwinder in the segv handler (if they choose to use the GWP-ASan provided one).
This is important as fast frame-pointer unwinders (like the sanitizer unwinder)
don't like unwinding through signal handlers.

Reviewers: morehouse, cryptoad

Reviewed By: morehouse, cryptoad

Subscribers: cryptoad, mgorny, eugenis, pcc, #sanitizers

Tags: #sanitizers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83994

The default calling convention needs to save/restore the SVE callee
saves according to the SVE PCS when the function takes or returns
scalable types, even when the `aarch64_sve_vector_pcs` CC is not
specified for the function.

Reviewers: efriedma, paulwalker-arm, david-arm, rengolin

Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84041

SPIR-V lowering does not use `MemrefDescriptor`s when lowering memref
types. This adds rationale for the choice made.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84184

This patch introduces conversion pattern for `spv.selection` op.
The conversion can only be applied to selection with all blocks being
reachable. Moreover, selection with control attributes "Flatten" and
"DontFlatten" is not supported.
Since the `PatternRewriter` hook for block merging has not been implemented
for `ConversionPatternRewriter`, merge and continue blocks are kept
separately.

Reviewed By: antiagainst, ftynse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83860

The changes to "AlignTrailingComments" and "CommentPragmas" did not
result in what I expected (just leave the special comments alone).

Instead now the following:
  void test() {
    int i; // expected-error
           // expected-warning
  }

is formatted into:
  void test() {
    int i; // expected-error
    // expected-warning
  }

which is even worse.

Most of the code in compiler_rt is C code. However, clang_rt.profile
contains the InstrProfilingRuntime.cpp file, which builds as C++. This
means that including e.g. <stdint.h> will actually include libc++'s
<stdint.h> and then #include_next the system's <stdint.h>. However, if
the target we're building compiler-rt for isn't supported by libc++,
this will lead to a failure since libc++'s <stdint.h> includes <__config>,
which performs various checks.

Since the goal seems to *not* be including any header from the C++ Standard
Library in clang_rt.profile, using -nostdinc++ to ensure that doesn't
happen unknowingly seems to make sense.

rdar://65852694

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84205

Summary:
Teach LLVM to recognize the above pattern, where the operands are
either signed or unsigned types.

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83777

Summary:

FormattersContainer currently has an unused `m_name` member. Usually LLDB allows
giving objects names, but for the FormattersContainer it seems excessive. There
are only 4 FormattersContainer variables in LLDB and they are not usually passed
around, so one can always just go up a few frames when debugging to find out
which FormattersContainer you're dealing with.

Reviewers: mib, davide

Reviewed By: mib

Subscribers: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84154