aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/ProcessGDBRemote.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-07-29[lldb] Add WebAssembly Process Plugin (#150143)Jonas Devlieghere1-0/+2
Extend support in LLDB for WebAssembly. This PR adds a new Process plugin (ProcessWasm) that extends ProcessGDBRemote for WebAssembly targets. It adds support for WebAssembly's memory model with separate address spaces, and the ability to fetch the call stack from the WebAssembly runtime. I have tested this change with the WebAssembly Micro Runtime (WAMR, https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime) which implements a GDB debug stub and supports the qWasmCallStack packet. ``` (lldb) process connect --plugin wasm connect://localhost:4567 Process 1 stopped * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = trace frame #0: 0x40000000000001ad wasm32_args.wasm`main: -> 0x40000000000001ad <+3>: global.get 0 0x40000000000001b3 <+9>: i32.const 16 0x40000000000001b5 <+11>: i32.sub 0x40000000000001b6 <+12>: local.set 0 (lldb) b add Breakpoint 1: where = wasm32_args.wasm`add + 28 at test.c:4:12, address = 0x400000000000019c (lldb) c Process 1 resuming Process 1 stopped * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12 1 int 2 add(int a, int b) 3 { -> 4 return a + b; 5 } 6 7 int (lldb) bt * thread #1, name = 'nobody', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1 * frame #0: 0x400000000000019c wasm32_args.wasm`add(a=<unavailable>, b=<unavailable>) at test.c:4:12 frame #1: 0x40000000000001e5 wasm32_args.wasm`main at test.c:12:12 frame #2: 0x40000000000001fe wasm32_args.wasm ``` This PR is based on an unmerged patch from Paolo Severini: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78801. I intentionally stuck to the foundations to keep this PR small. I have more PRs in the pipeline to support the other features/packets. My motivation for supporting Wasm is to support debugging Swift compiled to WebAssembly: https://www.swift.org/documentation/articles/wasm-getting-started.html
2025-04-13[lldb] Remove vestigial remnants of reproducers (#135361)Pavel Labath1-3/+0
Not touching the SB API.
2025-04-11Reland "[lldb] Clear thread-creation breakpoints in ProcessGDBRemote::Clear ↵Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan1-0/+3
(#134397)" (#135296) This reapplies commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/232525f06942adb3b9977632e38dcd5f08c0642d. The original commit triggered a sanitizer failure when `Target` was destroyed. In `Target::Destroy`, `DeleteCurrentProcess` was called, but it did not destroy the thread creation breakpoints for the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` because `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear` was not called in that path. `Target `then proceeded to destroy its breakpoints, which resulted in a call to the destructor of a `std::vector` containing the breakpoints. Through a sequence of complicated events, destroying breakpoints caused the reference count of the underlying `ProcessGDBRemote` to finally reach zero. This, in turn, called `ProcessGDBRemote::Clear`, which attempted to destroy the breakpoints. To do that, it would go back into the Target's vector of breakpoints, which we are in the middle of destroying. We solve this by moving the breakpoint deletion into `Process:DoDestroy`, which is a virtual Process method that will be called much earlier.
2025-03-17Reapply "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#125242)" ↵Pavel Labath1-1/+3
(again) (#128156) This reverts commit https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/87b7f63a117c340a6d9ca47959335fd7ef6c7ad2, reapplying https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e66cf74fb4e6a103f923e34700a7b6f20ac2a9b with a small (and probably temporary) change to generate more debug info to help with diagnosing buildbot issues.
2025-01-31Revert "Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#125242)"Adrian Prantl1-3/+1
This reverts commit 7e66cf74fb4e6a103f923e34700a7b6f20ac2a9b. Breaking green dragon: https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/19569/testReport/junit/lldb-api/functionalities_reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueWatchpoints_py/
2025-01-31Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#125242)David Spickett1-1/+3
This reverts commit a774de807e56c1147d4630bfec3110c11d41776e. This is the same changes as last time, plus: * We load the binary into the target object so that on Windows, we can resolve the locations of the functions. * We now assert that each required breakpoint has at least 1 location, to prevent an issue like that in the future. * We are less strict about the unsupported error message, because it prints "error: windows" on Windows instead of "error: gdb-remote".
2025-01-30Revert "Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" ↵David Spickett1-3/+1
(#123906)"" (#125091) Reverts llvm/llvm-project#123945 Has failed on the Windows on Arm buildbot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/5865 ``` ******************** Unresolved Tests (2): lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueWatchpoints.py ******************** Failed Tests (1): lldb-api :: functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py ``` Reverting while I reproduce locally.
2025-01-30Reland "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#123906)" ↵David Spickett1-1/+3
(#123945) This reverts commit 22561cfb443267905d4190f0e2a738e6b412457f and fixes b7b9ccf44988edf49886743ae5c3cf4184db211f (#112079). The problem is that x86_64 and Arm 32-bit have memory regions above the stack that are readable but not writeable. First Arm: ``` (lldb) memory region --all <...> [0x00000000fffcf000-0x00000000ffff0000) rw- [stack] [0x00000000ffff0000-0x00000000ffff1000) r-x [vectors] [0x00000000ffff1000-0xffffffffffffffff) --- ``` Then x86_64: ``` $ cat /proc/self/maps <...> 7ffdcd148000-7ffdcd16a000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] 7ffdcd193000-7ffdcd196000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar] 7ffdcd196000-7ffdcd197000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 --xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall] ``` Compare this to AArch64 where the test did pass: ``` $ cat /proc/self/maps <...> ffffb87dc000-ffffb87dd000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 [vvar] ffffb87dd000-ffffb87de000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffb87de000-ffffb87e0000 r--p 0002a000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 ffffb87e0000-ffffb87e2000 rw-p 0002c000 00:3c 76927217 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 fffff4216000-fffff4237000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [stack] ``` To solve this, look up the memory region of the stack pointer (using https://lldb.llvm.org/resources/lldbgdbremote.html#qmemoryregioninfo-addr) and constrain the read to within that region. Since we know the stack is all readable and writeable. I have also added skipIfRemote to the tests, since getting them working in that context is too complex to be worth it. Memory write failures now display the range they tried to write, and register write errors will show the name of the register where possible. The patch also includes a workaround for a an issue where the test code could mistake an `x` response that happens to begin with an `O` for an output packet (stdout). This workaround will not be necessary one we start using the [new implementation](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fixing-incompatibilties-of-the-x-packet-w-r-t-gdb/84288) of the `x` packet. --------- Co-authored-by: Pavel Labath <pavel@labath.sk>
2025-01-22Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue" (#123906)Pavel Labath1-3/+1
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#112079 due to failures on the arm bot.
2025-01-22[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#112079)Robert O'Callahan1-1/+3
This commit adds support for a `SBProcess::ContinueInDirection()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. For testing purposes, this commit adds a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-reverse-execute functionality, implemented as a proxy between lldb and lldb-server in `lldbreverse.py`. This should not (and in practice cannot) be used for anything except testing. The tests here are quite minimal but we test that simple breakpoints and watchpoints work as expected during reverse execution, and that conditional breakpoints and watchpoints work when the condition calls a function that must be executed in the forward direction.
2024-10-10Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"Jason Molenda1-1/+1
Reverting this again; I added a commit which added @skipIfDarwin markers to the TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py and TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py API tests, which use lldb-server in gdbserver mode which does not work on Darwin. But the aarch64 ubuntu bot reported a failure on TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py, https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/6397 File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 63, in test_reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint self.reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal(async_mode=False) File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 81, in reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal self.expect( File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2372, in expect self.runCmd( File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1002, in runCmd self.assertTrue(self.res.Succeeded(), msg + output) AssertionError: False is not true : Process should be stopped due to history boundary Error output: error: Process must be launched. This reverts commit 4f297566b3150097de26c6a23a987d2bd5fc19c5.
2024-10-10[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)Robert O'Callahan1-1/+1
This commit only adds support for the `SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use by *tests only*. The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950 lines added).
2024-10-10Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"Augusto Noronha1-1/+1
This reverts commit d5e1de6da96c1ab3b8cae68447e8ed3696a7006e.
2024-10-10[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)Robert O'Callahan1-1/+1
This commit only adds support for the `SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this will follow in a later commit. This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use by *tests only*. The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950 lines added).
2024-08-05New ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout to resolve potential deadlock in single ↵jeffreytan811-0/+4
thread stepping (#90930) This PR introduces a new `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that will be used to address potential deadlock during single-thread stepping. While debugging a target with a non-trivial number of threads (around 5000 threads in one example target), we noticed that a simple step over can take as long as 10 seconds. Enabling single-thread stepping mode significantly reduces the stepping time to around 3 seconds. However, this can introduce deadlock if we try to step over a method that depends on other threads to release a lock. To address this issue, we introduce a new `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that can be controlled by the `target.process.thread.single-thread-plan-timeout` setting during single-thread stepping mode. The concept involves counting the elapsed time since the last internal stop to detect overall stepping progress. Once a timeout occurs, we assume the target is not making progress due to a potential deadlock, as mentioned above. We then send a new async interrupt, resume all threads, and `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` completes its task. To support this design, the major changes made in this PR are: 1. `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` is popped during every internal stop and reset (re-pushed) to the top of the stack (as a leaf node) during resume. This is achieved by always returning `true` from `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::DoPlanExplainsStop()` and `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::MischiefManaged()`. 2. A new thread-specific async interrupt stop is introduced, which can be detected/consumed by `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout`. 3. The clearing of branch breakpoints in the range thread plan has been moved from `DoPlanExplainsStop()` to `ShouldStop()`, as it is not guaranteed that it will be called. The detailed design is discussed in the RFC below: [https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599) --------- Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
2024-07-01Reland "[lldb] Parse and display register field enums" (#97258)" (#97270)David Spickett1-0/+5
This reverts commit d9e659c538516036e40330b6a98160cbda4ff100. I could not reproduce the Mac OS ASAN failure locally but I narrowed it down to the test `test_many_fields_same_enum`. This test shares an enum between x0, which is 64 bit, and cpsr, which is 32 bit. My theory is that when it does `register read x0`, an enum type is created where the undlerying enumerators are 64 bit, matching the register size. Then it does `register read cpsr` which used the cached enum type, but this register is 32 bit. This caused lldb to try to read an 8 byte value out of a 4 byte allocation: READ of size 8 at 0x60200014b874 thread T0 <...> =>0x60200014b800: fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fa fa fa fd fa fa fa[04]fa To fix this I've added the register's size in bytes to the constructed enum type's name. This means that x0 uses: __lldb_register_fields_enum_some_enum_8 And cpsr uses: __lldb_register_fields_enum_some_enum_4 If any other registers use this enum and are read, they will use the cached type as long as their size matches, otherwise we make a new type.
2024-07-01Revert "[lldb] Parse and display register field enums" (#97258)David Spickett1-5/+0
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#95768 due to a test failure on macOS with ASAN: https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-sanitized/425/console
2024-06-27[lldb] Parse and display register field enums (#95768)David Spickett1-0/+5
This teaches lldb to parse the enum XML elements sent by lldb-server, and make use of the information in `register read` and `register info`. The format is described in https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Enum-Target-Types.html. The target XML parser will drop any invalid enum or evalue. If we find multiple evalue for the same value, we will use the last one we find. The order of evalues from the XML is preserved as there may be good reason they are not in numerical order.
2024-03-06Fix lldb crash while handling concurrent vfork() (#81564)jeffreytan811-1/+2
We got user reporting lldb crash while the debuggee is calling vfork() concurrently from multiple threads. The crash happens because the current implementation can only handle single vfork, vforkdone protocol transaction. This diff fixes the crash by lldb-server storing forked debuggee's <pid, tid> pair in jstopinfo which will be decoded by lldb client to create StopInfoVFork for follow parent/child policy. Each StopInfoVFork will later have a corresponding vforkdone packet. So the patch also changes the `m_vfork_in_progress` to be reference counting based. Two new test cases are added which crash/assert without the changes in this patch. --------- Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
2023-11-30[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda1-2/+4
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 (cherry picked from commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6)
2023-11-28Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"David Spickett1-4/+2
...and follow ups. As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/49126 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/45824 ``` lldb-shell :: Subprocess/clone-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/fork-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/vfork-follow-child-wp.test ``` This reverts commit a6c62bf1a4717accc852463b664cd1012237d334, commit a0a1ff3ab40e347589b4e27d8fd350c600526735 and commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6.
2023-11-27[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda1-2/+4
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
2023-11-02[lldb][AArch64] Simplify handing of scalable registers using vg and svg (#70914)David Spickett1-0/+3
This removes explicit invalidation of vg and svg that was done in `GDBRemoteRegisterContext::AArch64Reconfigure`. This was in fact covering up a bug elsehwere. Register information says that a write to vg also invalidates svg (it does not unless you are in streaming mode, but we decided to keep it simple and say it always does). This invalidation was not being applied until *after* AArch64Reconfigure was called. This meant that without those manual invalidates this happened: * vg is written * svg is not invalidated * Reconfigure uses the written vg value * Reconfigure uses the *old* svg value I have moved the AArch64Reconfigure call to after we've processed the invalidations caused by the register write, so we no longer need the manual invalidates in AArch64Reconfigure. In addition I have changed the order in which expedited registers as parsed. These registers come with a stop notification and include, amongst others, vg and svg. So now we: * Parse them and update register values (including vg and svg) * AArch64Reconfigure, which uses those values, and invalidates every register, because offsets may have changed. * Parse the expedited registers again, knowing that none of the values will have changed due to the scaling. This means we use the expedited registers during the reconfigure, but the invalidate does not mean we throw all of them away. The cost is we parse them twice client side, but this is cheap compared to a network packet, and is limited to AArch64 targets only. On a system with SVE and SME, these are the packets sent for a step: ``` (lldb) b-remote.async> < 803> read packet: $T05thread:p1f80.1f80;name:main.o;threads:1f80;thread-pcs:000000000040056c<...>a1:0800000000000000;d9:0400000000000000;reason:trace;#fc intern-state < 21> send packet: $xfffffffff200,200#5e intern-state < 516> read packet: $e4f2ffffffff000000<...>#71 intern-state < 15> send packet: $Z0,400568,4#4d intern-state < 6> read packet: $OK#9a dbg.evt-handler < 16> send packet: $jThreadsInfo#c1 dbg.evt-handler < 224> read packet: $[{"name":"main.o","reason":"trace","registers":{"161":"0800000000000000",<...>}],"signal":5,"tid":8064}]]#73 ``` You can see there are no extra register reads which means we're using the expedited registers. For a write to vg: ``` (lldb) register write vg 4 lldb < 37> send packet: $Pa1=0400000000000000;thread:1f80;#4a lldb < 6> read packet: $OK#9a lldb < 20> send packet: $pa1;thread:1f80;#29 lldb < 20> read packet: $0400000000000000#04 lldb < 20> send packet: $pd9;thread:1f80;#34 lldb < 20> read packet: $0400000000000000#04 ``` There is the initial P write, and lldb correctly assumes that SVG is invalidated by this also so we read back the new vg and svg values afterwards.
2023-07-11Add a generic Process method to dump plugin history.Jim Ingham1-0/+2
I need to call this to figure out why the assert in StopInfoMachException::CreateStopReasonWithMachException is triggering, but it isn't appropriate to directly access the GDBRemoteCommunication there. And dumping whatever history the process plugin has collected during the run isn't gdb-remote specific... Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154992
2023-06-26[lldb][NFCI] Remove ConstString from Process::ConfigureStructuredDataAlex Langford1-1/+1
This is a follow-up to b4827a3c0a7ef121ca376713e115b04eff0f5194. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153675
2023-04-13[lldb] Read register fields from target XMLDavid Spickett1-0/+10
This teaches ProcessGDBRemote to look for "flags" nodes in the target XML that tell you what fields a register has. https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Target-Description-Format.html It will check for various invalid inputs like: * Flags nodes with 0 fields in them. * Start or end being > the register size. * Fields that overlap. * Required properties not being present (e.g. no name). * Flag sets being redefined. If anything untoward is found, we'll just drop the field or the flag set altogether. Register fields are a "nice to have" so LLDB shouldn't be crashing because of them, instead just log anything we throw away. So the user can fix their XML/file a bug with their vendor. Once that is done it will sort the fields and pass them to the RegisterFields class I added previously. There is no way to see these fields yet, so tests for this code will come later when the formatting code is added. The fields are stored in a map of unique pointers on the ProcessGDBRemote class. It will give out raw pointers on the assumption that the GDB process lives longer than the users of those pointers do. Which means RegisterInfo is still a trivial struct but we are properly destroying the fields when the GDB process ends. We can't store the fields directly in the map because adding new items may cause its storage to be reallocated, which would invalidate pointers we've already given out. Reviewed By: jasonmolenda, JDevlieghere Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145574
2023-02-14[LLDB] add arch-specific watchpoint behavior defaults to lldbJason Molenda1-2/+2
lldb was originally designed to get the watchpoint exception behavior from the gdb remote serial protocol stub -- exceptions are either received before the instruction executes, or after the instruction has executed. This behavior was reported via two lldb extensions to gdb RSP, so generic remote stubs like gdbserver or a JTAG stub, would not tell lldb which behavior was correct, and it would default to "exceptions are received after the instruction has executed". Two architectures hard coded their correct "exceptions before instruction" behavior, to work around this issue. Most architectures have a fixed behavior of watchpoint exceptions, and we can center that information in lldb. We can allow a remote stub to override the default behavior via our packet extensions if it's needed on a specific target. This patch also separates the fetching of the number of watchpoints from whether exceptions are before/after the insn. Currently if lldb couldn't fetch the number of watchpoints (not really needed), it also wouldn't get when exceptions are received, and watchpoint handling would fail. lldb doesn't actually use the number of watchpoints for anything beyond printing it to the user. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143215 rdar://101426626
2023-01-18Do qProcessInfo-hint binary loading later in Process setupJason Molenda1-0/+1
The remote stub may give lldb hints about binaries to be loaded, especially in a firmware type environment, and relay those hints in the qProcessInfo response. The binary loading was done very early in Process setup, before we had any threads, and this made it complicated for people to write dSYM python scripts which need access to a thread. Delay the binary loading until a bit later in the Process startup. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141972 rdar://104235301
2023-01-07[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<. I'll post a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc. This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-07[lldb] Add #include <optional> (NFC)Kazu Hirata1-0/+1
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>. I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with std::optional. This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-13Launch state discoverable in Darwin, use for SafeToCallFunctionsJason Molenda1-0/+2
The dynamic linker on Darwin, dyld, can provide status of the process state for a few significant points early on, most importantly, when libSystem has been initialized and it is safe to call functions behind the scenes. Pipe this information up from debugserver to DynamicLoaderMacOS, for the DynamicLoader::IsFullyInitialized() method, then have Thread::SafeToCallFunctions use this information. Finally, for the two utility functions in the AppleObjCRuntimeV2 LanguageRuntime plugin that I was fixing, call this method before running our utility functions to collect the list of objc classes registered in the runtime. User expressions will still be allowed to run any time - we assume the user knows what they are doing - but these two additional utility functions that they are unaware of will be limited by this state. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139054 rdar://102436092 can probably make function calls.
2022-09-19[lldb] Reset breakpoint hit count before new runsFelipe de Azevedo Piovezan1-4/+4
A common debugging pattern is to set a breakpoint that only stops after a number of hits is recorded. The current implementation never resets the hit count of breakpoints; as such, if a user re-`run`s their program, the debugger will never stop on such a breakpoint again. This behavior is arguably undesirable, as it renders such breakpoints ineffective on all but the first run. This commit changes the implementation of the `Will{Launch, Attach}` methods so that they reset the _target's_ breakpoint hitcounts. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133858
2022-08-12[lldb] [gdb-remote] Remove unimplemented ProcessIDIsValid() (NFC)Michał Górny1-2/+0
This method is not implemented and not referenced anywhere in the code. Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
2022-08-08[lldb] Make Process and subclass constructors protectedMichał Górny1-2/+2
Make constructors of the Process and its subclasses class protected, to prevent accidentally constructing Process on stack when it could be afterwards accessed via a shared_ptr (since it uses std::enable_shared_from_this<>). The only place where a stack allocation was used were unittests, and fixing them via declaring an explicit public constructor in the respective mock classes is trivial. Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131275
2022-03-23Revert "Expose GetAddressingBits() in the Process API."Adrian Prantl1-2/+0
This reverts commit 7504dd5e00f514628614db8ee07514c73220e597. In newer review feedback it was pointed out that there is a better API for this in Process::GetCodeAddressMask().
2022-03-23Expose GetAddressingBits() in the Process API.Adrian Prantl1-0/+2
This is needed by the Swift Plugin. See also https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/4110. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122347
2022-03-11[lldb] Add a getter for the process' system architectureJonas Devlieghere1-0/+2
This patch adds a getter for the process' system architecture. I went with Process::GetSystemArchitecture to match Platform::GetSystemArchitecture. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121443
2022-03-10[lldb/gdb-remote] Remove ancient debugserver workaroundPavel Labath1-1/+0
This workaround is the source of an awkwared Process->Platform dependency. While this could be solved in various ways (the only thing we really use is the plugin name), it may be better to just remove it -- the workaround was added 10 years ago (43c555dfc), and the affected debugservers were "old" even then, so hopefully they are not in use anymore. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121305
2022-02-24[lldb/host] Remove monitor_signals argument from process monitoring functionsPavel Labath1-3/+2
All current callers set the argument to false. monitor_signals=true used to be used in the Process plugins (which needed to know when the debugged process gets a signal), but this implementation has several serious issues, which means that individual process plugins now orchestrate the monitoring of debugged processes themselves. This allows us to simplify the implementation (no need to play with process groups), and the interface (we only catch fatal events, so the callback is always called just once). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120425
2022-02-23[lldb] Modernize ThreadLauncherPavel Labath1-1/+1
Accept a function object instead of a raw pointer. This avoids a bunch of boilerplate typically needed to pass arguments to the thread functions. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120321
2022-02-10Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett1-3/+3
This reverts commit 0df522969a7a0128052bd79182c8d58e00556e2f. Additional checks are added to fix the detection of the last memory region in GetMemoryRegions or repeating the "memory region" command when the target has non-address bits. Normally you keep reading from address 0, looking up each region's end address until you get LLDB_INVALID_ADDR as the region end address. (0xffffffffffffffff) This is what the remote will return once you go beyond the last mapped region: [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] [0x0001000000000000-0xffffffffffffffff) --- Problem is that when we "fix" the lookup address, we remove some bits from it. On an AArch64 system we have 48 bit virtual addresses, so when we fix the end address of the [stack] region the result is 0. So we loop back to the start. [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) --- To fix this I added an additional check for the last range. If the end address of the region is different once you apply FixDataAddress, we are at the last region. Since the end of the last region will be the last valid mappable address, plus 1. That 1 will be removed by the ABI plugin. The only side effect is that on systems with non-address bits, you won't get that last catch all unmapped region from the max virtual address up to 0xf...f. [0x0000fffff8000000-0x0000fffffffdf000) --- [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] <ends here> Though in some way this is more correct because that region is not just unmapped, it's not mappable at all. No extra testing is needed because this is already covered by TestMemoryRegion.py, I simply forgot to run it on system that had both top byte ignore and pointer authentication. This change has been tested on a qemu VM with top byte ignore, memory tagging and pointer authentication enabled. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115508
2022-01-03[lldb] Delete GDBRemoteCommunicationReplayServerPavel Labath1-5/+0
This survived the reproducer deletion.
2021-11-26Revert "Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions""David Spickett1-3/+3
This reverts commit fac3f20de55769d028bd92220e74f22fa57dd4b2. I found this has broken how we detect the last memory region in GetMemoryRegions/"memory region" command. When you're debugging an AArch64 system with pointer authentication, the ABI plugin will remove the top bit from the end address of the last user mapped area. (lldb) [0x0000fffffffdf000-0x0001000000000000) rw- [stack] ABI plugin removes anything above the 48th bit (48 bit virtual addresses by default on AArch64, leaving an address of 0. (lldb) [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000400000) --- You get back a mapping for 0 and get into an infinite loop.
2021-11-24[lldb/gdb-remote] Remove more non-stop mode remnantsPavel Labath1-4/+0
The read thread handling is completely dead code now that non-stop mode no longer exists.
2021-11-03Reland "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett1-3/+3
This reverts commit 5fbcf677347e38718461496d9e9e184a7a30c3fb. ProcessDebugger is used in ProcessWindows and NativeProcessWindows. I thought I was simplifying things by renaming to DoGetMemoryRegionInfo in ProcessDebugger but the Native process side expects "GetMemoryRegionInfo". Follow the pattern that WriteMemory uses. So: * ProcessWindows::DoGetMemoryRegioninfo calls ProcessDebugger::GetMemoryRegionInfo * NativeProcessWindows::GetMemoryRegionInfo does the same
2021-11-03Revert "[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regions"David Spickett1-3/+3
This reverts commit 6f5ce43b433706c3ae5c37022d6c0964b6bfadf8 due to build failure on Windows.
2021-11-03[lldb] Remove non address bits when looking up memory regionsDavid Spickett1-3/+3
On AArch64 we have various things using the non address bits of pointers. This means when you lookup their containing region you won't find it if you don't remove them. This changes Process GetMemoryRegionInfo to a non virtual method that uses the current ABI plugin to remove those bits. Then it calls DoGetMemoryRegionInfo. That function does the actual work and is virtual to be overriden by Process implementations. A test case is added that runs on AArch64 Linux using the top byte ignore feature. Reviewed By: omjavaid Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102757
2021-10-28[lldb] Remove ConstString from Process, ScriptInterpreter and StructuredData ↵Pavel Labath1-5/+3
plugin names
2021-10-18[lldb] Return StringRef from PluginInterface::GetPluginNamePavel Labath1-1/+3
There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString. While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings. I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877
2021-10-11[lldb] [ABI] Apply AugmentRegisterInfo() to DynamicRegisterInfo::RegistersMichał Górny1-20/+5
Call ABI::AugmentRegisterInfo() once with a vector of all defined registers rather than calling it for every individual register. Move and rename RemoteRegisterInfo from gdb-remote to DynamicRegisterInfo::Register, and use this class when augmenting registers. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111142