In TargetLibraryInfoImpl::isValidProtoForLibFunc we no longer
need the IsSizeTTy lambda function and the SizeTTy object. Instead
we just follow the regular structure of checking for integer types
given an exepected number of bits.

This patch adds a new command line option `openmp-opt-max-iterations`
that controls the maximum number of iterations the attributor will run
for when compiling OpenMP target device code. This patch also adds a
remark to indicate when the attributor failed because it did not run
for enough iterations.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110749

Noticed while investigating the regressions in D110995 - if the RHS element is already zero, then we don't need the corresponding LHS element.

Technically we could also recheck RHS once we have LHS's known zeros, but I haven't seen any missed opportunities from that yet.

This manifested itself as an asan failure in TestMultilineNavigation.py.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110962

This required huge amount of assembly surgery, but i think this is about right.

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z11crMEcj - for intels `Block RThroughput: =20.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=18.0`
So could pick cost of `25`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/eqT4ze3j4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =24.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So we could pick cost of `24`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111031

This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oYWv4cTnK - for intels `Block RThroughput: =10.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `10`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/33GMhrsG9 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =12.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `12`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111027

This one required quite a bit of assembly surgery.

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Tce3osvcz - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `5`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/oc3arEcnE - for intels `Block RThroughput: =6.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`
So pick cost of `6`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111026

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/sz5qdKnr4 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =1.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=1.0`
So pick cost of `1`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/Kzdjff63v - for intels `Block RThroughput: =4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `4`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111025

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5fqrh4qqo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =14.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=12.0`
So pick cost of `14`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/5fqrh4qqo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =22.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=16.0`
So pick cost of `22`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111022

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/zdz5Ga6fs - for intels `Block RThroughput: =7.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=6.0`
So pick cost of `7`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/qn71513ac - for intels `Block RThroughput: =11.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=8.0`
So pick cost of `11`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111021

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/d8PdhEszo - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `3`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/WojonfG5n - for intels `Block RThroughput: =5.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=3.0`
So pick cost of `5`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111020

The only sched models that for cpu's that support avx2
but not avx512 are: haswell, broadwell, skylake, zen1-3

For load we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/z8qa14bs3 - for intels `Block RThroughput: =3.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: =1.5`
So pick cost of `3`.

For store we have:
https://godbolt.org/z/GYGajoc4K - for intels `Block RThroughput: <=4.0`; for ryzens, `Block RThroughput: <=2.0`
So pick cost of `4`.

I'm directly using the shuffling asm the llc produced,
without any manual fixups that may be needed
to ensure sequential execution.

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111019

This patch fixes the return value of the builtin __builtin_ppc_load2r to
correctly return short instead of int.

Reviewed By: nemanjai, #powerpc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110771

Clarify that the strided layout specification is represented by a single semi-affine map.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110921

There's no need to pass this in explicitly because it is
trivially available from the semantics.

Fix the termination of "process connect" (and "gdb-remote") to kill
the process rather than attempting to disconnect the platform.
The latter only results in an error since we did not use "platform
connect", and apparently process-level connections (at least via
gdb-remote) do not really support disconnecting.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110996

As discussed on D110588 - Haswell/Broadwell don't have a great PMULLD implementation, we might want to enable this for them in the future

Identified in D109359.

Reviewed By: rriddle

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110805

A number of the ICF tests were not updated to use --print-icf-sections
instead of --verbose and various '-NOT' checks were not updated to the
latest output format of --print-icf-sections. Because these are all
'negative' tests, these issues have gone unnoticed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110353

The new constructor relies on type-based dynamic dispatch and allows one to
construct call operations given an object representing a FuncOp or its name as
a string, as opposed to requiring an explicitly constructed attribute.

Depends On D110947

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110948

Constructing a ConstantOp using the default-generated API is verbose and
requires to specify the constant type twice: for the result type of the
operation and for the type of the attribute. It also requires to explicitly
construct the attribute. Provide custom constructors that take the type once
and accept a raw value instead of the attribute. This requires dynamic dispatch
based on type in the constructor. Also provide the corresponding accessors to
raw values.

In addition, provide a "refinement" class ConstantIndexOp similar to what
exists in C++. Unlike other "op view" Python classes, operations cannot be
automatically downcasted to this class since it does not correspond to a
specific operation name. It only exists to simplify construction of the
operation.

Depends On D110946

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110947

Provide a couple of quality-of-life usability improvements for Python bindings,
in particular:

  * give access to the list of types for the list of op results or block
    arguments, similarly to ValueRange->TypeRange,

  * allow for constructing empty dictionary arrays,

  * support construction of array attributes by concatenating an existing
    attribute with a Python list of attributes.

All these are required for the upcoming customization of builtin and standard
ops.

Reviewed By: stellaraccident

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110946

Previously, PrintASCII would print the string "\ta" as "\x09a". However,
in C/C++ those strings are not the same: the trailing 'a' is part of the
escape sequence, which means it's equivalent to "\x9a". This is an
annoying quirk of the standard. (See
https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.ccon#nt:hexadecimal-escape-sequence)

To fix this, output three-digit octal escape sequences instead. Since
octal escapes are limited to max three digits, this avoids the problem
of subsequent characters unintentionally becoming part of the escape
sequence.

Dictionary files still use the non-C-compatible hex escapes, but I
believe we can't change the format since it comes from AFL, and
libfuzzer never writes such files, it only has to read them, so they're
not affected by this change.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110920

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109682

Avoid creating EpilogueVectorizationForceVF twice.

Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in clang.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110808

Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807

The hand-rolled linking logic in elf_common does not account for
the possibility of using LLVM dylib rather than a dozen static
libraries.  Since it does not seem to be easily convertible
to add_llvm_library, just hand-roll support for LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
This is necessary to support stand-alone builds against installed LLVM.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111038

TestClangREPL.py has been failing randomly on Arm/AArch64 Linux
buildbot. I am marking it as skipped to reduce false alarms.

As a follow up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D110849, adapt the input tensor size to match the iteration space.

Reviewed By: antiagainst

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110906

Reviewed By: sammccall

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110925

Separates the methods for recursive variable parsing in function
context and non-recursive parsing of global variables.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110570

This addresses a comment from review on D109845.  The concern was raised that an unbounded scan would be expensive.  Long term plan is to cache this search - likely reusing the existing mechanism for loop side effects - but let's be simple and conservative for now.

This addresses a comment from review on D109845.  Even for SCEVs which we can't find true bounds without recursing through operands, entry to the function forms a trivial upper bound.  In some cases, this trivial bound is enough to prove safety of flag inference.

This is a followon to D109845. With that landed, we will have fixed all known instances of pr51817, and can thus start inferring flags more aggressively with greatly reduced risk of miscompiles. This patch simply applies the same inference logic used in that patch to our other major flag inference path.

We can still do much better here (on both paths), but this is our first step.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111003

This fixes a violation of the wrap flag rules introduced in c4048d8f. This is an alternate fix to D106852.

The basic problem being fixed is that we infer a set of flags which is valid at some inner scope S1 (usually by correctly propagating them from IR), and then (incorrectly) extend them to a SCEV in scope S2 where S1 != S2. This is not in general safe per the wrap flags semantics recently defined.

In this patch, I include a simple inference step to handle the case where we can prove that S2 is the preheader of the loop S1, and that entry into S2 implies execution of S1. See the code for a more detailed explanation.

One worry I have with this patch is that I might be over-fitting what shows up in tests - and thus hiding negative impact we'd see in the real world. My best defense is that the rule used here very closely follows the one used to propagate the flags from IR to the inner add to start with, and thus if one is reasonable, so probably is the other. Curious what others think about that piece.

The test diffs are roughly as expected. Mostly analysis only, with two transform changes. Oddly, the result looks better in the loop-idiom test, and I don't understand the PPC output enough to have tell. Nothing terrible looking though. (For context, without the scope inference peephole, the test delta includes a couple of vectorization tests. Again, not super concerning, but slightly more so.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109845

This is basically the same change as 42cc7f3c
but for integer attributes. Rather than treating each attribute
individually, handle them all the same way. The only thing that
needs to be done per attribute is specify how get/add convert
from/to the raw representation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110963