aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>2014-02-10 08:06:04 -0800
committerPaul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>2014-03-29 08:44:16 +0000
commitdba153bbce59985b0d8a23fc8d01c3b51d7e8528 (patch)
tree686c03d3511b5f972eecb9534fda9acd689cb870
parentc92a605e2622e5598c737a699d3164b9934bbd8c (diff)
downloadriscv-openocd-dba153bbce59985b0d8a23fc8d01c3b51d7e8528.zip
riscv-openocd-dba153bbce59985b0d8a23fc8d01c3b51d7e8528.tar.gz
riscv-openocd-dba153bbce59985b0d8a23fc8d01c3b51d7e8528.tar.bz2
at91smad: Fixes to 'samd_protect'
Some fixes to 'samd_protect' including: - Fix a bug in which the value of 'set' parameter passed into the function was ignored so it was impossible to remove flash protection once it was set. - Check the protection status of the sector via 'is_protected' field of the corresponding 'flash_sector' structure to see if any actual HW manipulations needs to be done. - Change the way the errors during protection activation are handled. Now even in the case of error in the middle of protecting a number of sectors the subroutine would still update the state of the sector protection in sectors array so as to avoid cases where openocd thinks that the sector is not protected while it actually is. Change-Id: I4cc6445a98ec13bdd94c89f0711c17840738a215 Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/2027 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Andrey Yurovsky <yurovsky@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
-rw-r--r--src/flash/nor/at91samd.c35
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/src/flash/nor/at91samd.c b/src/flash/nor/at91samd.c
index ee9e9cb..bfd2c6a 100644
--- a/src/flash/nor/at91samd.c
+++ b/src/flash/nor/at91samd.c
@@ -254,24 +254,33 @@ static int samd_protect(struct flash_bank *bank, int set, int first, int last)
int res;
struct samd_info *chip = (struct samd_info *)bank->driver_priv;
+ res = ERROR_OK;
+
for (int s = first; s <= last; s++) {
- /* Load an address that is within this sector (we use offset 0) */
- res = target_write_u32(bank->target, SAMD_NVMCTRL + SAMD_NVMCTRL_ADDR,
- s * chip->sector_size);
- if (res != ERROR_OK)
- return res;
+ if (set != bank->sectors[s].is_protected) {
+ /* Load an address that is within this sector (we use offset 0) */
+ res = target_write_u32(bank->target, SAMD_NVMCTRL + SAMD_NVMCTRL_ADDR,
+ s * chip->sector_size);
+ if (res != ERROR_OK)
+ goto exit;
- /* Tell the controller to lock that sector */
- res = target_write_u16(bank->target,
- SAMD_NVMCTRL + SAMD_NVMCTRL_CTRLA,
- SAMD_NVM_CMD(SAMD_NVM_CMD_LR));
- if (res != ERROR_OK)
- return res;
- }
+ /* Tell the controller to lock that sector */
+
+ uint16_t cmd = (set) ?
+ SAMD_NVM_CMD(SAMD_NVM_CMD_LR) :
+ SAMD_NVM_CMD(SAMD_NVM_CMD_UR);
+ res = target_write_u16(bank->target,
+ SAMD_NVMCTRL + SAMD_NVMCTRL_CTRLA,
+ cmd);
+ if (res != ERROR_OK)
+ goto exit;
+ }
+ }
+exit:
samd_protect_check(bank);
- return ERROR_OK;
+ return res;
}
static bool samd_check_error(struct flash_bank *bank)