| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The commit "MdeModulePkg/DxeCapsuleLibFmp: Fix crash if no ESRT is
found" leads to a compilation error in
MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleLib.inf. The issue
occurs because the variable mDxeCapsuleLibReadyToBootEvent which is
declared as extern does not exist, while it is defined in
DxeCapsuleRuntime.c, a file not included in DxeCapsuleLib.inf. This
patch is to fix this by moving the variable defintion to DxeCapsuleLib.c
and declare it as extern in DxeCapsuleRuntime.c.
Reported-by: Gua Guo <gua.guo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
|
|
The ESRT table is not required in UEFI firmware. In such cases, the
table may not be present in the UEFI Configuration Table. The mEsrtTable
is to check if the IsNestedFmpCapsule() function is invoked at runtime
to determine whether to use gEsrtManagementProtocolGuid or the ESRT
table from the Configuration Table. Unfortunately, the check does not
cover situations where the ESRT is not present, potentially resulting in
a kernel crash. This patch is intended to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
|
|
If the SetVirtualAddressMap() is not called, mIsVirtualAddrConverted
is FALSE and the kernel crash occurs in IsNestedFmpCapsule() when
executing gBS->LocateProtocol () in the else case.
To serve the omitted SetVirtualAddressMap() call, we could just check
mEsrtTable presence instead of relying on mIsVirtualAddrConverted.
Signed-off-by: Nhi Pham <nhi@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|
|
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3737
Apply uncrustify changes to .c/.h files in the MdeModulePkg package
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|
|
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3760
Update all use of ', OPTIONAL' to ' OPTIONAL,' for function params.
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
|
|
Add bitmask to structure which gives a binary-inspectable mechanism to
determine if a capsule contains an authentication section or depex section.
(UEFI 2.8 errata a, mantis 2026)
Signed-off-by: Oleksiy Yakovlev <oleksiyy@ami.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
|
|
For the LoadImage() boot service, with EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION retval,
the Image was loaded and an ImageHandle was created with a valid
EFI_LOADED_IMAGE_PROTOCOL, but the image can not be started right now.
This follows UEFI Spec.
But if the caller of LoadImage() doesn't have the option to defer
the execution of an image, we can not treat EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION
like any other LoadImage() error, we should unload image for the
EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION to avoid resource leak.
This patch is to do error handling for EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION explicitly
for the callers in DxeCapsuleLibFmp which don't have the policy to defer
the execution of the image.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
|
|
REF: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/
UEFI-Capsule-on-Disk-Introducation
CoDCheckCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to check if CapsuleOnDisk flag in
"OsIndications" Variable is enabled. It is used to indicate whether
capsule on disk is provisioned in normal boot path.
CoDClearCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to to clear CapsuleOnDisk flags,
including "OsIndications" and "BootNext" variable.
CoDRelocateCapsule() is to relocate the capsules from EFI system
partition. Depends on PcdCapsuleInRamSupport, there are two solutions
to relocate the capsule on disk images:
When Capsule In Ram is supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into memory, and call UpdateCapsule() service to deliver
the capsules.
When Capsule In Ram is not supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into a temp file which will be stored in root directory on
a platform specific storage device. CapsuleOnDiskLoadPei PEIM will
retrieve the capsules from the relocation temp file and report
capsule hobs for them.
CoDRemoveTempFile() is to remove the relocation temp file in the next
boot after capsules are processed.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 0d4aa276d1f6e0cb9d71a7fb88b30c416ba6d5a3,
6470a43160183cd48cad8901c912a48811f18b13,
fd7286089542ee7a98cfea00be45ceb3561e0b20,
7837d1249807b4248079699097bc993254235d7a,
6b32af2e105f9b5454a55b581f2dc365c5eb6397,
8636f70b5a763ed1c03b292708f9c5543e531ea9,
f17935321a5b818a66e999632ef371b374b98f0c
due to incorrect review process.
Cc: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
|
|
https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UEFI-Capsule-
on-Disk-Introducation
CoDCheckCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to check if CapsuleOnDisk flag in
"OsIndications" Variable is enabled. It is used to indicate whether
capsule on disk is provisioned in normal boot path.
CoDClearCapsuleOnDiskFlag() is to to clear CapsuleOnDisk flags,
including "OsIndications" and "BootNext" variable.
CoDRelocateCapsule() is to relocate the capsules from EFI system
partition. Depends on PcdCapsuleInRamSupport, there are two solutions
to relocate the capsule on disk images:
When Capsule In Ram is supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into memory, and call UpdateCapsule() service to deliver
the capsules.
When Capsule In Ram is not supported, the Capsule On Disk images are
relocated into a temp file which will be stored in root directory on
a platform specific storage device. CapsuleOnDiskLoadPei PEIM will
retrieve the capsules from the relocation temp file and report
capsule hobs for them.
CoDRemoveTempFile() is to remove the relocation temp file in the next
boot after capsules are processed.
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei6 Xu <wei6.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao B Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
Replace BSD 2-Clause License with BSD+Patent License. This change is
based on the following emails:
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-February/036260.html
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2018-October/030385.html
RFCs with detailed process for the license change:
V3: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/038116.html
V2: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037669.html
V1: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2019-March/037500.html
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1088
Per UEFI spec, the fake capsule image with the header only is a valid case
in QueryCapsuleCpapbilities(). So, SupportCapsuleImage() is updated to
support this case.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
|
|
The PCDs below are unused, so they have been removed from inf.
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleMax
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdSystemRebootAfterCapsuleProcessFlag
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdStatusCodeSubClassCapsule
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeProcessCapsulesBegin
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeProcessCapsulesEnd
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdatingFirmware
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdateFirmwareSuccess
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeUpdateFirmwareFailed
gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCapsuleStatusCodeResettingSystem
The library Pcdlib is not linked， so "#include <Library/PcdLib.h>"
is deleted.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1144
Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
|
|
Add NULL check to the return buffers from GetFmpHandleBufferByType().
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Hao A Wu <Hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao A Wu <Hao.a.wu@intel.com>
|
|
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
Current DxeCapsuleLibFmp always do reset for FMP capsule.
Actually, the code should use Attributes from FMP descriptor to know
whether reset is required or not.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
|
|
The code to check FmpImageSize again OFFSET_OF
(EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_IMAGE_HEADER, UpdateHardwareInstance)
can be refined to check against FmpImageHeaderSize.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Ming Shao <ming.shao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
If the first call to UpdateImageProgress() fails, there is no point
in passing a pointer to it to Fmp->SetImage(), since it is highly
unlikely to succeed on any subsequent calls.
This permits the FMP implementation to fall back to an alternate means
of providing feedback to the user, e.g., via the console.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=801
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport
* Change Update_Image_Progress() to UpdateImageProcess()
* Call DisplayUpdateProgressLib from UpdateImageProgress().
* Split out a boot service and runtime version of
UpdateImageProgress() so the DisplayUpdateProgressLib is
not used at runtime.
* If gEdkiiFirmwareManagementProgressProtocolGuid is present,
then use its progress bar color and watchdog timer value.
* If gEdkiiFirmwareManagementProgressProtocolGuid is not present,
then use default progress bar color and 5 min watchdog timer.
* Remove Print() calls during capsule processing. Instead,
the DisplayUpdateProgressLib is used to inform the user
of progress during a capsule update.
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
DEBUG((
DEBUG_ERROR,
"ItemOffsetList[%d](0x%lx) < ItemOffsetList[%d](0x%x)\n",
Index,
ItemOffsetList[Index],
Index, // Should be Index - 1
ItemOffsetList[Index - 1]
));
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873
Update IsNestedFmpCapsule() to verify the CapsuleGuid in
the CapsuleHeader against the installed Firmware Management
Protocol instances. The current logic that uses the ESRT
Table does not work because capsules are processed before
the ESRT Table is published at the Ready To Boot event.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
|
|
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=800
Based on content from the following branch/commits:
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/tree/share/MsCapsuleSupport
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/33bab4031a417d7d5a7d356c15a14c2e60302b2d
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/ca516b1a61315c2d823f453e12d2135098f53d61
https://github.com/Microsoft/MS_UEFI/commit/2b9f111f2e74a4c2ef4c4e32379e111f016dbd9b
Use BmpSupportLib to convert a BMP graphics image to a
GOP BLT buffer.
Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
|
|
Move the definition of variable "mEsrtTable" and
"mIsVirtualAddrConverted" to DxeCapsuleLib.c.
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: jiewen.yao@intel.com
|
|
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
The previous patch has problem on handling capsule
request at runtime.
This patch fixed the issue.
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
|
|
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
There are cases that the operands of an expression are all with rank less
than UINT64/INT64 and the result of the expression is explicitly cast to
UINT64/INT64 to fit the target size.
An example will be:
UINT32 a,b;
// a and b can be any unsigned int type with rank less than UINT64, like
// UINT8, UINT16, etc.
UINT64 c;
c = (UINT64) (a + b);
Some static code checkers may warn that the expression result might
overflow within the rank of "int" (integer promotions) and the result is
then cast to a bigger size.
The commit refines codes by the following rules:
1). When the expression is possible to overflow the range of unsigned int/
int:
c = (UINT64)a + b;
2). When the expression will not overflow within the rank of "int", remove
the explicit type casts:
c = a + b;
3). When the expression will be cast to pointer of possible greater size:
UINT32 a,b;
VOID *c;
c = (VOID *)(UINTN)(a + b); --> c = (VOID *)((UINTN)a + b);
4). When one side of a comparison expression contains only operands with
rank less than UINT32:
UINT8 a;
UINT16 b;
UINTN c;
if ((UINTN)(a + b) > c) {...} --> if (((UINT32)a + b) > c) {...}
For rule 4), if we remove the 'UINTN' type cast like:
if (a + b > c) {...}
The VS compiler will complain with warning C4018 (signed/unsigned
mismatch, level 3 warning) due to promoting 'a + b' to type 'int'.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
|
|
For pointer subtraction, the result is of type "ptrdiff_t". According to
the C11 standard (Committee Draft - April 12, 2011):
"When two pointers are subtracted, both shall point to elements of the
same array object, or one past the last element of the array object; the
result is the difference of the subscripts of the two array elements. The
size of the result is implementation-defined, and its type (a signed
integer type) is ptrdiff_t defined in the <stddef.h> header. If the result
is not representable in an object of that type, the behavior is
undefined."
In our codes, there are cases that the pointer subtraction is not
performed by pointers to elements of the same array object. This might
lead to potential issues, since the behavior is undefined according to C11
standard.
Also, since the size of type "ptrdiff_t" is implementation-defined. Some
static code checkers may warn that the pointer subtraction might underflow
first and then being cast to a bigger size. For example:
UINT8 *Ptr1, *Ptr2;
UINTN PtrDiff;
...
PtrDiff = (UINTN) (Ptr1 - Ptr2);
The commit will refine the pointer subtraction expressions by casting each
pointer to UINTN first and then perform the subtraction:
PtrDiff = (UINTN) Ptr1 - (UINTN) Ptr2;
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
|
|
Previous logic does not follow UEFI 22.2.3 to process FMP strictly.
It may cause FMP image not be processed in some corner case.
The updated logic follows UEFI 22.2.3.
The way to check if a capsule is processed is also simplified.
The function - ProcessFmpCapsuleImage() is too big, so that
we created sub-functions - StartFmpImage(), DumpAllFmpInfo(),
GetFmpHandleBufferByType(), SetFmpImageData(), RecordFmpCapsuleStatus()
to improve the readability.
The function - ProcessTheseCapsules() is too big, so that
we created sub-functions - InitCapsulePtr(), AreAllImagesProcessed(),
PopulateCapsuleInConfigurationTable() to improve the readability.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
UEFI spec requires CapsuleTarget to be a device path associated
with FMP producer.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
UEFI specification does not require ImageIndex check,
it only requires ImageTypeId check.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
|
|
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
|
|
This instance handles Microsoft UX capsule, UEFI defined FMP capsule.
This instance should not assume any capsule image format.
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
|
