aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/hw/i386/e820_memory_layout.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-07-03hw/i386/fw_cfg: Add etc/e820 to fw_cfg lateDavid Woodhouse1-6/+2
In e820_add_entry() the e820_table is reallocated with g_renew() to make space for a new entry. However, fw_cfg_arch_create() just uses the existing e820_table pointer. This leads to a use-after-free if anything adds a new entry after fw_cfg is set up. Shift the addition of the etc/e820 file to the machine done notifier, via a new fw_cfg_add_e820() function. Also make e820_table private and use an e820_get_table() accessor function for it, which sets a flag that will trigger an assert() for any *later* attempts to add to the table. Make e820_add_entry() return void, as most callers don't check for error anyway. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Message-Id: <a2708734f004b224f33d3b4824e9a5a262431568.camel@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2022-11-02hw/i386/e820: remove legacy reserved entries for e820Ani Sinha1-8/+0
e820 reserved entries were used before the dynamic entries with fw config files were intoduced. Please see the following change: 7d67110f2d9a6("pc: add etc/e820 fw_cfg file") Identical support was introduced into seabios as well with the following commit: ce39bd4031820 ("Add support for etc/e820 fw_cfg file") Both the above commits are now quite old. QEMU machines 1.7 and newer no longer use the reserved entries. Seabios uses fw config files and dynamic e820 entries by default and only falls back to using reserved entries when it has to work with old qemu (versions earlier than 1.7). Please see functions qemu_cfg_e820() and qemu_early_e820(). It is safe to remove legacy FW_CFG_E820_TABLE and associated code now as QEMU 7.0 has deprecated i440fx machines 1.7 and older. It would be incredibly rare to run the latest qemu version with a very old version of seabios that did not support fw config files for e820. As far as I could see, edk2/ovfm never supported reserved entries and uses fw config files from the beginning. So there should be no incompatibilities with ovfm as well. CC: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220831045311.33083-1-ani@anisinha.ca> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2022-05-11Clean up header guards that don't match their file nameMarkus Armbruster1-2/+2
Header guard symbols should match their file name to make guard collisions less likely. Cleaned up with scripts/clean-header-guards.pl, followed by some renaming of new guard symbols picked by the script to better ones. Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20220506134911.2856099-2-armbru@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> [Change to generated file ebpf/rss.bpf.skeleton.h backed out]
2019-09-16hw/i386/pc: Extract e820 memory layout codePhilippe Mathieu-Daudé1-0/+42
Suggested-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190818225414.22590-3-philmd@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>