aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/target
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLeandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br>2022-10-28 15:36:17 -0300
committerDaniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>2022-10-29 06:34:52 -0300
commitfb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56 (patch)
treee6ea55504519b9d0aa62378aeade62bd6327a0e2 /target
parent63e4bf8e84721231ea447b0e4afcb0a4378763c2 (diff)
downloadqemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.zip
qemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.tar.gz
qemu-fb22d743b93b49b73930aff40d3ba9d252f81a56.tar.bz2
target/ppc: Fix regression in Radix MMU
Commit 47e83d9107 ended up unintentionally changing the control flow of ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(). When guest_visible is false, it must not raise an exception, even if the radix configuration is not valid. This regression prevented Linux boot in a nested environment with L1 using TCG and emulating KVM (cap-nested-hv=on) and L2 using KVM. L2 would hang on Linux's futex_init(), when it tested how a futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() handled a fault, because L1 would start a loop of trying to perform partition scoped translations and raising exceptions. Fixes: 47e83d9107 ("target/ppc: Improve Radix xlate level validation") Reported-by: Victor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> Signed-off-by: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> Tested-by: VĂ­ctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Message-Id: <20221028183617.121786-1-leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> [danielhb: use %"PRIu64" to print 'nls'] Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target')
-rw-r--r--target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c29
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
index 00f2e9f..031efda 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu-radix64.c
@@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static void ppc_radix64_set_rc(PowerPCCPU *cpu, MMUAccessType access_type,
static bool ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(int level, int psize, uint64_t nls)
{
+ bool ret;
+
/*
* Check if this is a valid level, according to POWER9 and POWER10
* Processor User's Manuals, sections 4.10.4.1 and 5.10.6.1, respectively:
@@ -249,16 +251,25 @@ static bool ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(int level, int psize, uint64_t nls)
*/
switch (level) {
case 0: /* Root Page Dir */
- return psize == 52 && nls == 13;
+ ret = psize == 52 && nls == 13;
+ break;
case 1:
case 2:
- return nls == 9;
+ ret = nls == 9;
+ break;
case 3:
- return nls == 9 || nls == 5;
+ ret = nls == 9 || nls == 5;
+ break;
default:
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid radix level: %d\n", level);
- return false;
+ ret = false;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(!ret)) {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "invalid radix configuration: "
+ "level %d size %d nls %"PRIu64"\n",
+ level, psize, nls);
}
+ return ret;
}
static int ppc_radix64_next_level(AddressSpace *as, vaddr eaddr,
@@ -519,11 +530,13 @@ static int ppc_radix64_process_scoped_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
if (!ppc_radix64_is_valid_level(level++, *g_page_size, nls)) {
fault_cause |= DSISR_R_BADCONFIG;
- return 1;
+ ret = 1;
+ } else {
+ ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(cs->as, eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK,
+ &h_raddr, &nls, g_page_size,
+ &pte, &fault_cause);
}
- ret = ppc_radix64_next_level(cs->as, eaddr & R_EADDR_MASK, &h_raddr,
- &nls, g_page_size, &pte, &fault_cause);
if (ret) {
/* No valid pte */
if (guest_visible) {