diff options
author | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2023-03-01 17:28:21 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> | 2023-03-01 17:30:34 -0800 |
commit | 8e5aded3de88e9403bd95b152e2a5597b5d92895 (patch) | |
tree | a5c2033c47d2c44e5bd86c912ec1397ad9f90f05 /target/riscv/csr.c | |
parent | fc9ec3625f6dee52811c8150af994abe3c1668a3 (diff) | |
parent | 62108f05e74ce6d2a07d79e9de8801f685d60453 (diff) | |
download | qemu-8e5aded3de88e9403bd95b152e2a5597b5d92895.zip qemu-8e5aded3de88e9403bd95b152e2a5597b5d92895.tar.gz qemu-8e5aded3de88e9403bd95b152e2a5597b5d92895.tar.bz2 |
Merge patch series "target/riscv: Add support for Svadu extension"
Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn> says:
This patchset adds support svadu extension. It also fixes some
relationship between *envcfg fields and Svpbmt/Sstc extensions.
Specification for Svadu extension can be found in:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-svadu
* b4-shazam-merge:
target/riscv: Export Svadu property
target/riscv: Add *envcfg.HADE related check in address translation
target/riscv: Add *envcfg.PBMTE related check in address translation
target/riscv: Add csr support for svadu
target/riscv: Fix the relationship of PBMTE/STCE fields between menvcfg and henvcfg
target/riscv: Fix the relationship between menvcfg.PBMTE/STCE and Svpbmt/Sstc extensions
Message-ID: <20230224040852.37109-1-liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'target/riscv/csr.c')
-rw-r--r-- | target/riscv/csr.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c index a2cf353..ee49b63 100644 --- a/target/riscv/csr.c +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c @@ -1879,10 +1879,13 @@ static RISCVException read_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) { + RISCVCPUConfig *cfg = &env_archcpu(env)->cfg; uint64_t mask = MENVCFG_FIOM | MENVCFG_CBIE | MENVCFG_CBCFE | MENVCFG_CBZE; if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) { - mask |= MENVCFG_PBMTE | MENVCFG_STCE; + mask |= (cfg->ext_svpbmt ? MENVCFG_PBMTE : 0) | + (cfg->ext_sstc ? MENVCFG_STCE : 0) | + (cfg->ext_svadu ? MENVCFG_HADE : 0); } env->menvcfg = (env->menvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); @@ -1899,7 +1902,10 @@ static RISCVException read_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) { - uint64_t mask = MENVCFG_PBMTE | MENVCFG_STCE; + RISCVCPUConfig *cfg = &env_archcpu(env)->cfg; + uint64_t mask = (cfg->ext_svpbmt ? MENVCFG_PBMTE : 0) | + (cfg->ext_sstc ? MENVCFG_STCE : 0) | + (cfg->ext_svadu ? MENVCFG_HADE : 0); uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32; env->menvcfg = (env->menvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask); @@ -1979,7 +1985,13 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, return ret; } - *val = env->henvcfg; + /* + * henvcfg.pbmte is read_only 0 when menvcfg.pbmte = 0 + * henvcfg.stce is read_only 0 when menvcfg.stce = 0 + * henvcfg.hade is read_only 0 when menvcfg.hade = 0 + */ + *val = env->henvcfg & (~(HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE | HENVCFG_HADE) | + env->menvcfg); return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } @@ -1995,7 +2007,7 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, } if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) { - mask |= HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE; + mask |= env->menvcfg & (HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE | HENVCFG_HADE); } env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); @@ -2013,14 +2025,16 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, return ret; } - *val = env->henvcfg >> 32; + *val = (env->henvcfg & (~(HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE | HENVCFG_HADE) | + env->menvcfg)) >> 32; return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) { - uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE; + uint64_t mask = env->menvcfg & (HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE | + HENVCFG_HADE); uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32; RISCVException ret; |