aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepRange.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-07-25[lldb] Use std::make_shared where possible (NFC) (#150714)Jonas Devlieghere1-2/+2
This is a continuation of 68fd102, which did the same thing but only for StopInfo. Using make_shared is both safer and more efficient: - With make_shared, the object and the control block are allocated together, which is more efficient. - With make_shared, the enable_shared_from_this base class is properly linked to the control block before the constructor finishes, so shared_from_this() will be safe to use (though still not recommended during construction).
2025-02-25[lldb] Avoid Function::GetAddressRange in ThreadPlanStepRange::InSymbol ↵Pavel Labath1-3/+5
(#128515) The existing implementation would probably produce false positives for discontinuous functions. I haven't tried reproducing it because setting up discontinuous functions (and executing them, in particular) is pretty complex and there's nothing particularly interesting happening here.
2024-11-11[lldb] Support overriding the disassembly CPU & features (#115382)Jonas Devlieghere1-2/+4
Add the ability to override the disassembly CPU and CPU features through a target setting (`target.disassembly-cpu` and `target.disassembly-features`) and a `disassemble` command option (`--cpu` and `--features`). This is especially relevant for architectures like RISC-V which relies heavily on CPU extensions. The majority of this patch is plumbing the options through. I recommend looking at DisassemblerLLVMC and the test for the observable change in behavior.
2024-11-05More refinement of call site handling in stepping. (#114628)jimingham1-3/+47
When you set a "next branch breakpoint" and run to it while stepping, you have to claim the stop at that breakpoint to be the top of the inlined call stack, or you will seem to "step in" and then plans might try to step back out again. This records the PrefferedLineEntry for next branch breakpoints and adds a test to make sure this works.
2024-08-05New ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout to resolve potential deadlock in single ↵jeffreytan811-26/+45
thread stepping (#90930) This PR introduces a new `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that will be used to address potential deadlock during single-thread stepping. While debugging a target with a non-trivial number of threads (around 5000 threads in one example target), we noticed that a simple step over can take as long as 10 seconds. Enabling single-thread stepping mode significantly reduces the stepping time to around 3 seconds. However, this can introduce deadlock if we try to step over a method that depends on other threads to release a lock. To address this issue, we introduce a new `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that can be controlled by the `target.process.thread.single-thread-plan-timeout` setting during single-thread stepping mode. The concept involves counting the elapsed time since the last internal stop to detect overall stepping progress. Once a timeout occurs, we assume the target is not making progress due to a potential deadlock, as mentioned above. We then send a new async interrupt, resume all threads, and `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` completes its task. To support this design, the major changes made in this PR are: 1. `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` is popped during every internal stop and reset (re-pushed) to the top of the stack (as a leaf node) during resume. This is achieved by always returning `true` from `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::DoPlanExplainsStop()` and `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::MischiefManaged()`. 2. A new thread-specific async interrupt stop is introduced, which can be detected/consumed by `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout`. 3. The clearing of branch breakpoints in the range thread plan has been moved from `DoPlanExplainsStop()` to `ShouldStop()`, as it is not guaranteed that it will be called. The detailed design is discussed in the RFC below: [https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599) --------- Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
2024-07-01[lldb] Make semantics of SupportFile equivalence explicit (#97126)Jonas Devlieghere1-2/+3
This is an improved attempt to improve the semantics of SupportFile equivalence, taking into account the feedback from #95606. Pavel's comment about the lack of a concise name because the concept isn't trivial made me realize that I don't want to abstract this concept away behind a helper function. Instead, I opted for a rather verbose enum that forces the caller to consider exactly what kind of comparison is appropriate for every call.
2024-01-16[lldb] Store SupportFile in LineEntry (NFC) (#77999)Jonas Devlieghere1-2/+2
Store a SupportFile, rather than a FileSpec, in LineEntry. This commit works towards having the SourceManageroperate on SupportFiles so that it can (1) validate the Checksum and (2) materialize the content of inline source information.
2023-11-30[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda1-7/+7
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116 (cherry picked from commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6)
2023-11-28Revert "[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)"David Spickett1-7/+7
...and follow ups. As it has caused test failures on Linux Arm and AArch64: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/49126 https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/45824 ``` lldb-shell :: Subprocess/clone-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/fork-follow-child-wp.test lldb-shell :: Subprocess/vfork-follow-child-wp.test ``` This reverts commit a6c62bf1a4717accc852463b664cd1012237d334, commit a0a1ff3ab40e347589b4e27d8fd350c600526735 and commit fc6b72523f3d73b921690a713e97a433c96066c6.
2023-11-27[lldb] [mostly NFC] Large WP foundation: WatchpointResources (#68845)Jason Molenda1-7/+7
This patch is rearranging code a bit to add WatchpointResources to Process. A WatchpointResource is meant to represent a hardware watchpoint register in the inferior process. It has an address, a size, a type, and a list of Watchpoints that are using this WatchpointResource. This current patch doesn't add any of the features of WatchpointResources that make them interesting -- a user asking to watch a 24 byte object could watch this with three 8 byte WatchpointResources. Or a Watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1002 and a second watchpoint on 1 byte at 0x1003, these must both be served by a single WatchpointResource on that doubleword at 0x1000 on a 64-bit target, if two hardware watchpoint registers were used to track these separately, one of them may not be hit. Or if you have one Watchpoint on a variable with a condition set, and another Watchpoint on that same variable with a command defined or different condition, or ignorecount, both of those Watchpoints need to evaluate their criteria/commands when their WatchpointResource has been hit. There's a bit of code movement to rearrange things in the direction I'll need for implementing this feature, so I want to start with reviewing & landing this mostly NFC patch and we can focus on the algorithmic choices about how WatchpointResources are shared and handled as they're triggeed, separately. This patch also stops printing "Watchpoint <n> hit: old value: <x>, new vlaue: <y>" for Read watchpoints. I could make an argument for print "Watchpoint <n> hit: current value <x>" but the current output doesn't make any sense, and the user can print the value if they are particularly interested. Read watchpoints are used primarily to understand what code is reading a variable. This patch adds more fallbacks for how to print the objects being watched if we have types, instead of assuming they are all integral values, so a struct will print its elements. As large watchpoints are added, we'll be doing a lot more of those. To track the WatchpointSP in the WatchpointResources, I changed the internal API which took a WatchpointSP and devolved it to a Watchpoint*, which meant touching several different Process files. I removed the watchpoint code in ProcessKDP which only reported that watchpoints aren't supported, the base class does that already. I haven't yet changed how we receive a watchpoint to identify the WatchpointResource responsible for the trigger, and identify all Watchpoints that are using this Resource to evaluate their conditions etc. This is the same work that a BreakpointSite needs to do when it has been tiggered, where multiple Breakpoints may be at the same address. There is not yet any printing of the Resources that a Watchpoint is implemented in terms of ("watchpoint list", or SBWatchpoint::GetDescription). "watchpoint set var" and "watchpoint set expression" take a size argument which was previously 1, 2, 4, or 8 (an enum). I've changed this to an unsigned int. Most hardware implementations can only watch 1, 2, 4, 8 byte ranges, but with Resources we'll allow a user to ask for different sized watchpoints and set them in hardware-expressble terms soon. I've annotated areas where I know there is work still needed with LWP_TODO that I'll be working on once this is landed. I've tested this on aarch64 macOS, aarch64 Linux, and Intel macOS. https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-large-watchpoint-support-in-lldb/72116
2022-02-03[lldb] Rename Logging.h to LLDBLog.h and clean up includesPavel Labath1-0/+1
Most of our code was including Log.h even though that is not where the "lldb" log channel is defined (Log.h defines the generic logging infrastructure). This worked because Log.h included Logging.h, even though it should. After the recent refactor, it became impossible the two files include each other in this direction (the opposite inclusion is needed), so this patch removes the workaround that was put in place and cleans up all files to include the right thing. It also renames the file to LLDBLog to better reflect its purpose.
2022-02-02[lldb] Convert "LLDB" log channel to the new APIPavel Labath1-7/+7
2021-04-16Target::ReadMemory read from read-only binary file Section, not memoryJason Molenda1-2/+1
Commiting this patch for Augusto Noronha who is getting set up still. This patch changes Target::ReadMemory so the default behavior when a read is in a Section that is read-only is to fetch the data from the local binary image, instead of reading it from memory. Update all callers to use their old preferences (the old prefer_file_cache bool) using the new API; we should revisit these calls and see if they really intend to read live memory, or if reading from a read-only Section would be equivalent and important for performance-sensitive cases. rdar://30634422 Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100338
2020-08-05Remove special Hexagon packet traversal codeTed Woodward1-6/+2
On Hexagon, breakpoints need to be on the first instruction of a packet. When the LLVM disassembler for Hexagon returned 32 bit instructions, we needed code to find the start of the current packet. Now that the LLVM disassembler for Hexagon returns packets instead of instructions, we always have the first instruction of the packet. Remove the packet traversal code because it can cause problems when the next packet has more than one instruction. Reviewed By: clayborg Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84966
2020-04-03Fix unused variable, format, and format string warnings.Eric Christopher1-1/+0
NFC.
2020-04-03Make ThreadPlans use TID and Process, rather than Thread *.Jim Ingham1-31/+29
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75711
2020-03-05[lldb] s/ExecutionContext/Target in DisassemblerPavel Labath1-2/+1
Some functions in this file only use the "target" component of an execution context. Adjust the argument lists to reflect that. This avoids some defensive null checks and simplifies most of the callers.
2020-01-24[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headersRaphael Isemann1-1/+1
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files). This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line). Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2019-12-20[lldb] Fix a -Wreturn-type warning on gccPavel Labath1-0/+1
2019-12-17[lldb] Fix unused variable warning in ThreadPlanStepRange.cppRaphael Isemann1-1/+0
This was added in 434905b97d961531286d4b49c7ee1969f7cbea0e. Remove it to fix the compiler warnings for this.
2019-12-16Run all threads when extending a next range over a call.Jim Ingham1-3/+19
If you don't do this you end up running arbitrary code with only one thread allowed to run, which can cause deadlocks. <rdar://problem/56422478> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71440
2019-07-24[Logging] Replace Log::Printf with LLDB_LOG macro (NFC)Jonas Devlieghere1-28/+29
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format strings, instead of formatv-style format strings. So instead of writing: if (log) log->Printf("%s\n", str); You'd write: LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str); This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line replacements with it. find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \ sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" + Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128 llvm-svn: 366936
2019-05-09Improve step over performance by not stopping at branches that are function ↵Greg Clayton1-3/+4
calls and stepping into and them out of each one Currently when we single step over a source line, we run and stop at every branch in the source line range. We can reduce the number of times we stop when stepping over by figuring out if any of these branches are function calls, and if so, ignore these branches. Since we are stepping over we can safely ignore these calls since they will return to the next instruction. Currently the step logic would stop at those branches (1st stop), single step into the branch (2nd stop), and then set a breakpoint at the return address (3rd stop), and then continue. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58678 llvm-svn: 360375
2019-05-06Include inlined functions when figuring out a contiguous address rangeGreg Clayton1-4/+8
Checking this in for Antonio Afonso: This diff changes the function LineEntry::GetSameLineContiguousAddressRange so that it also includes function calls that were inlined at the same line of code. My motivation is to decrease the step over time of lines that heavly rely on inlined functions. I have multiple examples in the code base I work that makes a step over stop 20 or mote times internally. This can easly had up to step overs that take >500ms which I was able to lower to 25ms with this new strategy. The reason the current code is not extending the address range beyond an inlined function is because when we resolve the symbol at the next address of the line entry we will get the entry line corresponding to where the original code for the inline function lives, making us barely extend the range. This then will end up on a step over having to stop multiple times everytime there's an inlined function. To check if the range is an inlined function at that line I also get the block associated with the next address and check if there is a parent block with a call site at the line we're trying to extend. To check this I created a new function in Block called GetContainingInlinedBlockWithCallSite that does exactly that. I also added a new function to Declaration for convinence of checking file/line named CompareFileAndLine. To avoid potential issues when extending an address range I added an Extend function that extends the range by the AddressRange given as an argument. This function returns true to indicate sucess when the rage was agumented, false otherwise (e.g.: the ranges are not connected). The reason I do is to make sure that we're not just blindly extending complete_line_range by whatever GetByteSize() we got. If for some reason the ranges are not connected or overlap, or even 0, this could be an issue. I also added a unit tests for this change and include the instructions on the test itself on how to generate the yaml file I use for testing. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61292 llvm-svn: 360071
2019-04-10[NFC] Remove ASCII lines from commentsJonas Devlieghere1-2/+0
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment. Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment. I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508 llvm-svn: 358135
2019-01-19Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepoChandler Carruth1-4/+3
to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2018-11-15Add setting to require hardware breakpoints.Jonas Devlieghere1-1/+17
When debugging read-only memory we cannot use software breakpoint. We already have support for hardware breakpoints and users can specify them with `-H`. However, there's no option to force LLDB to use hardware breakpoints internally, for example while stepping. This patch adds a setting target.require-hardware-breakpoint that forces LLDB to always use hardware breakpoints. Because hardware breakpoints are a limited resource and can fail to resolve, this patch also extends error handling in thread plans, where breakpoints are used for stepping. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54221 llvm-svn: 346920
2018-11-11Remove header grouping comments.Jonas Devlieghere1-4/+0
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain. llvm-svn: 346626
2018-04-30Reflow paragraphs in comments.Adrian Prantl1-26/+21
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2017-03-03Move Log from Core -> Utility.Zachary Turner1-1/+1
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this class can now safely be lowered into Utility. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559 llvm-svn: 296909
2017-02-15Bug 30863 - Step doesn't stop with conditional breakpoint on the next lineBoris Ulasevich1-0/+10
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26497 (committed r290168, temporary reverted r290197) https://reviews.llvm.org/D28945 (fix for Ubuntu tests fail) https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909 (fix for TestCallThatThrows test fail) llvm-svn: 295168
2017-02-02Move classes from Core -> Utility.Zachary Turner1-1/+1
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
2017-01-27Unroll r292930 due to TestCallThatThrows test fail is not fixed in ↵Boris Ulasevich1-10/+0
reasonable time. llvm-svn: 293269
2017-01-24Bug 30863 - Step doesn't stop with conditional breakpoint on the next lineBoris Ulasevich1-0/+10
Differential Revisions: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26497 (committed r290168, temporary reverted r290197) https://reviews.llvm.org/D28945 (fix for Ubuntu tests fail) llvm-svn: 292930
2016-12-20Rollback my commit r290168 to fix linux tests failure. I'll be back!Boris Ulasevich1-10/+0
llvm-svn: 290197
2016-12-20Bug 30863 - Step doesn't stop with coditional breakpoint on the next lineBoris Ulasevich1-0/+10
Fixed by additional completed plans detection, and applying them on breakpoint condition fail. Thread::GetStopInfo reworked. New test added. Review https://reviews.llvm.org/D26497 Many thanks to Jim llvm-svn: 290168
2016-09-06*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source codeKate Stone1-444/+374
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-06-07Now that there are no cycles that cause leaks in the ↵Greg Clayton1-10/+0
disassembler/instruction classes, we can get rid of the FIXME lines that were working around this issue. <rdar://problem/26684190> llvm-svn: 272071
2016-05-11Keep original source path and mapped path in LineEntryTed Woodward1-1/+1
Summary: The "file" variable in a LineEntry was mapped using target.source-map, except when stepping through inlined code. This patch adds a new variable to LineEntry, "original_file", that contains the original file from the debug info. "file" will continue to (possibly) be mapped. Some code has been changed to use "original_file". This is code dealing with symbols. Code dealing with source files will still use "file". Reviewers, please confirm that these particular changes are correct. Tests run on Ubuntu 12.04 show no regression. Reviewers: clayborg, jingham Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20135 llvm-svn: 269250
2015-12-15Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and readability-simplify-boolean-expr ↵Eugene Zelenko1-31/+12
warnings in some files in source/Target/. Simplify smart pointers checks in conditions. Other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 255598
2015-12-15When constructing an address range to "step" or "next" through,Jason Molenda1-2/+2
find the largest address range (possibly combining multiple LineEntry's for this line number) that is contiguous. This allows lldb's fast-step stepping algorithm to potentially run for a longer address range than if we have to stop at every LineEntry indicating a subexpression in the source line. http://reviews.llvm.org/D15407 <rdar://problem/23270882> llvm-svn: 255590
2015-11-13Fix commit 252963 to work around a bug on some platforms where they don't Jim Ingham1-3/+13
correctly handle stepping over one breakpoint directly onto another breakpoint. This isn't fixing that bug, but rather just changing 252963 to not use breakpoints if it is only stepping one instruction. llvm-svn: 253008
2015-11-13Revert "Another little stepping optimization: if any of the source step ↵Ying Chen1-9/+2
commands are running through a range " - Revert because this commit introduce several failures in lldb test suite - http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake/builds/8391 - This reverts commit 78943bb678c2893703ee4e8b41969372740c8a6f. llvm-svn: 252980
2015-11-12Another little stepping optimization: if any of the source step commands are ↵Jim Ingham1-2/+9
running through a range of addresses, and the range has no branches, instead of running to the last instruction and single-stepping over that, run to the first instruction after the end of the range. If there are no branches in the current range, then the bytes right after it have to be in the current function, and have to be instructions not data in code, so this is safe. And it cuts down one extra stepi per source range step. Incidentally, this also works around a bug in the llvm Intel assembler where it treats the "rep" prefix as a separate instruction from the repeated instruction. If that were at the end of a line range, then we would put a trap in place of the repeated instruction, which is undefined behavior. Current processors just ignore the repetition in this case, which changes program behavior. Since there would never be a line range break after the rep prefix, always doing the range stepping to the beginning of the new range avoids this problem. <rdar://problem/23461686> llvm-svn: 252963
2015-07-16Fix compiler warning in ThreadPlanStepRangePavel Labath1-1/+1
llvm-svn: 242403
2015-07-14Small fix to ThreadPlanStepRange::DumpRanges to loggingJason Molenda1-1/+1
output when stepping through multiple ranges. llvm-svn: 242243
2015-06-25Resubmitting 240466 after fixing the linux test suite failures.Greg Clayton1-2/+2
A few extras were fixed - Symbol::GetAddress() now returns an Address object, not a reference. There were places where people were accessing the address of a symbol when the symbol's value wasn't an address symbol. On MacOSX, undefined symbols have a value zero and some places where using the symbol's address and getting an absolute address of zero (since an Address object with no section and an m_offset whose value isn't LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS is considered an absolute address). So fixing this required some changes to make sure people were getting what they expected. - Since some places want to access the address as a reference, I added a few new functions to symbol: Address &Symbol::GetAddressRef(); const Address &Symbol::GetAddressRef() const; Linux test suite passes just fine now. <rdar://problem/21494354> llvm-svn: 240702
2015-05-11Add Hexagon packet support to ThreadPlanStepRangeTed Woodward1-1/+2
Summary: Hexagon is a VLIW processor. It can execute multiple instructions at once, called a packet. Breakpoints need to be alone in a packet. This patch will make sure that temporary breakpoints used for stepping are set at the start of a packet, which will put the breakpoint in a packet by itself. Patch by Deepak Panickal of CodePlay and Ted Woodward of Qualcomm. Reviewers: deepak2427, clayborg Reviewed By: clayborg Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9437 llvm-svn: 237047
2015-03-18Move lldb-log.cpp to core/Logging.cppZachary Turner1-2/+0
So that we don't have to update every single #include in the entire codebase to #include this new header (which used to get included by lldb-private-log.h, we automatically #include "Logging.h" from within "Log.h". llvm-svn: 232653
2014-09-29This checkin is the first step in making the lldb thread stepping mechanism ↵Jim Ingham1-3/+5
more accessible from the user level. It adds the ability to invent new stepping modes implemented by python classes, and to view the current thread plan stack and to some extent alter it. I haven't gotten to documentation or tests yet. But this should not cause any behavior changes if you don't use it, so its safe to check it in now and work on it incrementally. llvm-svn: 218642