| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
See the related issue. We want to set up a build bot where `opt` runs with `-enable-profcheck`, which inserts `MD_prof` before running the rest of the pipeline requested from `opt`, and then validates resulting profile information (more info in the RFC linked by the aforementioned issue)
In that setup, we will also ignore `FileCheck`: while the profile info inserted is, currently, equivalent to the profile info a pass would observe via `BranchProbabilityInfo`/`BlockFrequencyInfo`, (1) we may want to change that, and (2) some tests are quite sensitive to the output IR, and break if, for instance, extra metadata is present (which it would be due to `-enable-profcheck`). Since we're just interested in profile consistency on the upcoming bot, ignoring `FileCheck` is simpler and sufficient. However, this has the effect of passing XFAIL tests. Rather than listing them all, the alternative is to just exclude XFAIL tests.
This PR adds support for that by introducing a `--exclude-xfail` option to `llvm-lit`.
Issue #147390
|
|
If a test took more than one attempt to complete, show the number of attempts and the maximum allowed attempts as `2 of 4 attempts` inside the `<progress info>` (see [TEST RUN OUTPUT FORMAT](https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html#test-run-output-format)).
NOTE: Additionally this is a fixup for #141851 where the tests were not quite right. `max-retries-per-test/allow-retries-test_retry_attempts/test.py` was added but never used there. Now we're calling it. To correlate better between the test output and the test script I've used higher numbers of max allowed retries.
|
|
This is a fixup for #141851 and removes `=` from all
options with additional arguments.
Before 14 out of 22 options with arguments used "=" and 7 didn't.
|
|
When packaging LLVM we've seen arbitrary tests fail.
It happened sporadically and most of the times the test
do work if they are run a second time on the next day.
The tests themselves were always different and we didn't
know ahead of time which ones we wanted to re-run.
That's we filter-out a lot of `libomp` and `libarcher` tests [1].
This change allows us to set
`LIT_OPTS="--max-retries-per-test=12"`
when running any "check-XXX" build target. Then any lit test
will at most be re-run 12 times, unless there's an `ALLOW_RETRIES:`
in one of the test scripts that's specifying a different value
than `12`. `12` is just an example here, any positive integer
will work.
Please note, that this only adds the possibility to re-run
lit tests. It does not actually do it until the caller specifies
`--max-retries-per-test=<POSITIVE_INT>` either on a call to `lit` or
in `LIT_OPTS`.
Also note, that one can still use `ALLOW_RETRIES:` in test scripts
and it will always rule over `--max-retries-per-test`. When
`--max-retries-per-test` is set too low, but the
`config.test_retry_attempts`
is high enough, it works as well.
Any option in the list below overrules its predecessor:
* `--max-retries-per-test`
* `config.test_retry_attempts`
* `ALLOW_RETRIES` keyword
From the above options to re-run tests, `--max-retries-per-test` is the
only one that doesn't require a change in the test scripts or the test
config.
[1]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_2326
Downstream PR to make use of the `--max-retries-per-test` option:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/pull-request/434
Downstream ticket: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/LLVM-145
|
|
code 1 (#136190)
Documentation of when `lit` exits with code 1 is out of date.
It is no longer just "FAIL or XPASS", there are more failure types:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b30100b87f24847afd6407b4939a184ebcf16ef9/llvm/utils/lit/lit/Test.py#L51-L55
Exit code can also be affected by `--ignore-fail` option:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b30100b87f24847afd6407b4939a184ebcf16ef9/llvm/utils/lit/lit/main.py#L154-L162
This PR extracts a clear definition of "failure" from the description of
`--report-failures-only` option:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b30100b87f24847afd6407b4939a184ebcf16ef9/llvm/docs/CommandGuide/lit.rst?plain=1#L194-L196
...puts it into "Test Status Results" section and references it when
describing exit codes and `--ignore-fail` option.
|
|
This reverts commit 57e89c97c2c1b4e41f07a90c2f4d36649696e619.
Updated lit tests.
|
|
This reverts commit 8d3dc1ed5656a3e69e4195d58684a7f4bf0ff5cc.
Test needs to be updated.
|
|
When a developer copy/pastes a failing command line into their
shell to rerun it, they have to manually delete the "RUN: at line
N:" prefix. To make life easier for such developers, let's make it
possible to copy/paste a command without needing to modify it while
still showing the line number in the output by moving the line number
to a comment at the end of the command line.
Reviewers: jroelofs, MaskRay
Reviewed By: jroelofs, MaskRay
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132485
|
|
- Add option (--report-failures-only) to generate a reduced report for
lit tests that only includes failing tests
- This is a continuation of proposed patches by @gregbedwell here:
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D143516
- https://reviews.llvm.org/D143519
---------
Co-authored-by: Greg Bedwell <greg.bedwell@sony.com>
Co-authored-by: James Henderson <James.Henderson@sony.com>
|
|
Fixes #62899
In this commit I have updated the list of options
to include any missing options and re-rordered
some of them to match the order in lit's --help.
Where there was a larger description in this document
I've used that instead of the --help description.
This *does not* include --use-unique-output-file-name
as this was only added recently and we are still
debating whether it will be kept.
|
|
Also added `%{t:stem}` as an alias for `%basename_t` and modified unit
test to test these new substitutions.
|
|
Add support for `%basename_s` pattern in the RUN commands to get the
base name of the source file, and adopt it in a TableGen LIT test.
|
|
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#108425
|
|
This adds a flag to lit for detecting and updating failing tests when
possible to do so automatically. The flag uses a plugin architecture
where config files can add additional auto-updaters for the types of
tests in the test suite. When a test fails with `--update-tests` enabled
lit passes the test RUN invocation and output to each registered test
updater until one of them signals that it updated the test (or all test
updaters have been run). As such it is the responsibility of the test
updater to only update tests where it is reasonably certain that it will
actually fix the test, or come close to doing so.
Initially adds support for UpdateVerifyTests and UpdateTestChecks. The
flag is currently only implemented for lit's internal shell, so
`--update-tests` implies `LIT_USE_INTERNAL_SHELL=1`.
Builds on work in #97369
Fixes #81320
|
|
LLVM lit assumes control of the test parallelism when running a test
suite. This style of testing doesn't play nicely with build systems like
Buck or Bazel since it prefers finer grained actions on a per-test
level. In order for external build systems to control the test
parallelism, add an option to disable `.lit_test_times.txt` under the
`--skip-test-time-recording` flag, thus allowing other build systems
to determine the parallelism and avoid race conditions when writing
to that file. I went for `--skip-test-time-recording` instead of `--time-tests` in
order to preserve the original functionality of writing to `.lit_test_times.txt`
as the default behavior and only opt-in for those who do _not_ want
`.lit_test_times.txt` file.
|
|
|
|
This patch and D154984 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.
Motivation
----------
D154984 removes the "Script:" section that lit prints along with a
test's output, and it makes -v and -a imply -vv. For example, after
D154984, the "Script:" section below is never shown, but -v is enough
to produce the execution trace following it:
```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello | FileCheck bogus.txt && echo success
--
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello"
# command output:
hello
$ "FileCheck" "bogus.txt"
# command stderr:
Could not open check file 'bogus.txt': No such file or directory
error: command failed with exit status: 2
--
```
In the D154984 review, some reviewers point out that they have been
using the "Script:" section for copying and pasting a test's shell
commands to a terminal window. The shell commands as printed in the
execution trace can be harder to copy and paste for the following
reasons:
- They drop redirections and break apart RUN lines at `&&`, `|`, etc.
- They add `$` at the start of every command, which makes it hard to
copy and paste multiple commands in bulk.
- Command stdout, stderr, etc. are interleaved with the commands and
are not clearly delineated.
- They don't always use proper shell quoting. Instead, they blindly
enclose all command-line arguments in double quotes.
Changes
-------
D154984 plus this patch converts the above example into:
```
Exit Code: 2
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
echo hello | FileCheck bogus-file.txt && echo success
# executed command: echo hello
# .---command stdout------------
# | hello
# `-----------------------------
# executed command: FileCheck bogus-file.txt
# .---command stderr------------
# | Could not open check file 'bogus-file.txt': No such file or directory
# `-----------------------------
# error: command failed with exit status: 2
--
```
Thus, this patch addresses the above issues as follows:
- The entire execution trace can be copied and pasted in bulk to a
terminal for correct execution of the RUN lines, which are printed
intact as they appeared in the original RUN lines except lit
substitutions are expanded. Everything else in the execution trace
appears in shell comments so it has no effect in a terminal.
- Each of the RUN line's commands is repeated (in shell comments) as
it executes to show (1) that the command actually executed (e.g.,
`echo success` above didn't) and (2) what stdout, stderr, non-zero
exit status, and output files are associated with the command, if
any. Shell quoting in the command is now correct and minimal but is
not necessarily the original shell quoting from the RUN line.
- The start and end of the contents of stdout, stderr, or an output
file is now delineated clearly in the trace.
To help produce some of the above output, this patch extends lit's
internal shell with a built-in `@echo` command. It's like `echo`
except lit suppresses the normal execution trace for `@echo` and just
prints its stdout directly. For now, `@echo` isn't documented for use
in lit tests.
Without this patch, libcxx's custom lit test format tries to parse the
stdout from `lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` (which runs lit's
internal shell) to extract the stdout and stderr produced by shell
commands, and that parse no longer works after the above changes.
This patch makes a small adjustment to
`lit.TestRunner.executeScriptInternal` so libcxx can just request
stdout and stderr without an execution trace.
(As a minor drive-by fix that came up in testing: lit's internal `not`
command now always produces a numeric exit status and never `True`.)
Caveat
------
This patch only makes the above changes for lit's internal shell. In
most cases, we do not know how to force external shells (e.g., bash,
sh, window's `cmd`) to produce execution traces in the manner we want.
To configure a test suite to use lit's internal shell (which is
usually better for test portability than external shells anyway), add
this to the test suite's `lit.cfg` or other configuration file:
```
config.test_format = lit.formats.ShTest(execute_external=False)
```
Reviewed By: MaskRay, awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156954
|
|
This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.
**Motivation**: -a shows output from all tests, and -v shows output
from just failed tests. Without this patch, that output from each
test includes a section called "Script:", which includes all shell
commands that lit has computed from RUN directives and will attempt to
run for that test. The effect of -vv (which also implies -v if
neither -a or -v is specified) is to extend that output with shell
commands as they are executing so you can easily see which one failed.
For example, when using lit's internal shell and -vv:
```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello world
: 'RUN: at line 2'; 3c40 hello world
: 'RUN: at line 3'; echo hello world
--
Exit Code: 127
Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello" "world"
hello world
$ ":" "RUN: at line 2"
$ "3c40" "hello" "world"
'3c40': command not found
error: command failed with exit status: 127
--
```
Notice that all shell commands that actually execute appear in the
output twice, once for "Script:" and once for -vv. Especially for
tests with many RUN directives, the result is noisy. When searching
through the output for a particular shell command, it is easy to get
lost and mistake shell commands under "Script:" for shell commands
that actually executed.
**Change**: With this patch, a test's output changes in two ways.
First, the "Script:" section is never shown. Second, omitting -vv no
longer disables printing of shell commands as they execute. That is,
-a and -v imply -vv, and so -vv is deprecated as it is just an alias
for -v.
**Secondary motivation**: We are also working to introduce a PYTHON
directive, which can appear between RUN directives. How should PYTHON
directives be represented in the "Script:" section, which has
previously been just a shell script? We could probably think of
something, but adding info about PYTHON directive execution in the -vv
trace seems more straight-forward and more useful.
(This patch also removes a confusing point in the -vv documentation:
at least when using bash as an external shell, -vv echoes commands to
the shell's stderr not stdout.)
Reviewed By: awarzynski, Endill, ldionne, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154984
|
|
This reverts commit 09b6e457d91ce84088e6e21783913e5f1e5bd227.
The reason for the revert is discussed at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839/52
|
|
This patch and D156954 were discussed in
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-lits-debug-output/72839>.
**Motivation**: -a shows output from all tests, and -v shows output
from just failed tests. Without this patch, that output from each
test includes a section called "Script:", which includes all shell
commands that lit has computed from RUN directives and will attempt to
run for that test. The effect of -vv (which also implies -v if
neither -a or -v is specified) is to extend that output with shell
commands as they are executing so you can easily see which one failed.
For example, when using lit's internal shell and -vv:
```
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1'; echo hello world
: 'RUN: at line 2'; 3c40 hello world
: 'RUN: at line 3'; echo hello world
--
Exit Code: 127
Command Output (stdout):
--
$ ":" "RUN: at line 1"
$ "echo" "hello" "world"
hello world
$ ":" "RUN: at line 2"
$ "3c40" "hello" "world"
'3c40': command not found
error: command failed with exit status: 127
--
```
Notice that all shell commands that actually execute appear in the
output twice, once for "Script:" and once for -vv. Especially for
tests with many RUN directives, the result is noisy. When searching
through the output for a particular shell command, it is easy to get
lost and mistake shell commands under "Script:" for shell commands
that actually executed.
**Change**: With this patch, a test's output changes in two ways.
First, the "Script:" section is never shown. Second, omitting -vv no
longer disables printing of shell commands as they execute. That is,
-a and -v imply -vv, and so -vv is deprecated as it is just an alias
for -v.
**Secondary motivation**: We are also working to introduce a PYTHON
directive, which can appear between RUN directives. How should PYTHON
directives be represented in the "Script:" section, which has
previously been just a shell script? We could probably think of
something, but adding info about PYTHON directive execution in the -vv
trace seems more straight-forward and more useful.
(This patch also removes a confusing point in the -vv documentation:
at least when using bash as an external shell, -vv echoes commands to
the shell's stderr not stdout.)
Reviewed By: awarzynski, Endill, ldionne, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154984
|
|
Running lit tests on Windows can fail because its use of
`os.path.realpath` expands substitute drives, which are used to keep
paths short and avoid hitting MAX_PATH limitations.
Changes lit logic to:
Use `os.path.abspath` on Windows, where `MAX_PATH` is a concern that we
can work around using substitute drives, which `os.path.realpath` would
resolve.
Use `os.path.realpath` on Unix, where the current directory always has
symlinks resolved, so it is impossible to preserve symlinks in the
presence of relative paths, and so we must make sure that all code paths
use real paths.
Also updates clang's `FileManager::getCanonicalName` and `ExtractAPI`
code to avoid resolving substitute drives (i.e. resolving to a path
under a different root).
How tested: built with `-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang` and built `check-all` on both Windows
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154130
Reviewed By: @benlangmuir
Patch by Tristan Labelle <tristan@thebrowser.company>!
|
|
divided per test case
This patch is the first part of https://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_patch_coverage.
We have first define a new variable LLVM_TEST_COVERAGE which when set, pass --per-test-coverage option to
llvm-lit which will help in setting a unique value to LLVM_PROFILE_FILE for each RUN. So for example
coverage data for test case llvm/test/Analysis/AliasSet/memtransfer.ll will be emitted as
build/test/Analysis/AliasSet/memtransfer0.profraw
Reviewed By: hnrklssn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154280
|
|
coverage data, divided per test case"
This reverts commit d8e26bccb3016d255298b7db78fe8bf05dd880b2.
Test case are meant to run only when LLVM_INDIVIDUAL_TEST_COVERAGE is set.
|
|
divided per test case
This patch is the first part of https://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_patch_coverage.
We have first define a new variable LLVM_TEST_COVERAGE which when set, pass --emit-coverage option to
llvm-lit which will help in setting a unique value to LLVM_PROFILE_FILE for each RUN. So for example
coverage data for test case llvm/test/Analysis/AliasSet/memtransfer.ll will be emitted as
build/test/Analysis/AliasSet/memtransfer.profraw
Reviewed By: hnrklssn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154280
|
|
This option had originally been added in D83069 to allow disabling the
check that something is going to get run at all when a specific test name
is used on the command-line. Since we now use getTestsForPath() (from D151664)
to get the tests to run for a specific path, we don't need a specific check
for this anymore -- Lit will produce the same complaint it would produce if
you provided a directory with no tests.
If one needs to run a specific test on the command-line and the Lit
configuration would normally not include that test, the configuration
should be set up as a "standalone" configuration or it should be fixed
to allow for that test to be found (i.e. probably fix the allowed test
suffixes).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153967
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143586
|
|
These directives define per-test lit substitutions. The concept was
discussed at
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/iterating-lit-run-lines/62596/10>.
For example, the following directives can be inserted into a test file
to define `%{cflags}` and `%{fcflags}` substitutions with empty
initial values, which serve as the parameters of another newly defined
`%{check}` substitution:
```
// DEFINE: %{cflags} =
// DEFINE: %{fcflags} =
// DEFINE: %{check} = %clang_cc1 %{cflags} -emit-llvm -o - %s | \
// DEFINE: FileCheck %{fcflags} %s
```
The following directives then redefine the parameters before each use
of `%{check}`:
```
// REDEFINE: %{cflags} = -foo
// REDEFINE: %{fcflags} = -check-prefix=FOO
// RUN: %{check}
// REDEFINE: %{cflags} = -bar
// REDEFINE: %{fcflags} = -check-prefix=BAR
// RUN: %{check}
```
Of course, `%{check}` would typically be more elaborate, increasing
the benefit of the reuse.
One issue is that the strings `DEFINE:` and `REDEFINE:` already appear
in 5 tests. This patch adjusts those tests not to use those strings.
Our prediction is that, in the vast majority of cases, if a test
author mistakenly uses one of those strings for another purpose, the
text appearing after the string will not happen to have the syntax
required for these directives. Thus, the test author will discover
the mistake immediately when lit reports the syntax error.
This patch also expands the documentation on existing lit substitution
behavior.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay, awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132513
|
|
This was requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D132437.
|
|
This allows reading arguments from file using the response file syntax.
We would like to use this in the LLVM build to pass test suites from
subbuilds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132437
|
|
This adds 2 new lit helpers `%{fs-src-root}` and `%{fs-sep}`, these
allow writing tests that correctly handle slashes on Windows. In the
case of tests like clang/test/CodeGen/debug-prefix-map.c, these are
unable to correctly test behavior on both platforms, unless they fork
and add OS requirements, because the relevant logic hits host specific
codepaths like checking if paths are absolute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111457
|
|
Add a new --order option to choose between available test orders:
the default "smart" order, predictable "lexical" order or "random"
order. Default to using lexical order and one job in the lit test
suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107695
|
|
For example, I need this lately in my CI config:
LIT_XFAIL_NOT='libomptarget :: nvptx64-nvidia-cuda :: unified_shared_memory/api.c'
That test specifies an XFAIL directive, but I get an XPASS result.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106022
|
|
The new documentation entry gives an example use case from
libomptarget.
Reviewed By: yln, jhenderson, davezarzycki
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105208
|
|
Lit as it exists today has three hacks that allow users to run tests earlier:
1) An entire test suite can set the `is_early` boolean.
2) A very recently introduced "early_tests" feature.
3) The `--incremental` flag forces failing tests to run first.
All of these approaches have problems.
1) The `is_early` feature was until very recently undocumented. Nevertheless it still lacks testing and is a imprecise way of optimizing test starting times.
2) The `early_tests` feature requires manual updates and doesn't scale.
3) `--incremental` is undocumented, untested, and it requires modifying the *source* file system by "touching" the file. This "touch" based approach is arguably a hack because it confuses editors (because it looks like the test was modified behind the back of the editor) and "touching" the test source file doesn't work if the test suite is read only from the perspective of `lit` (via advanced filesystem/build tricks).
This patch attempts to simplify and address all of the above problems.
This patch formalizes, documents, tests, and defaults lit to recording the execution time of tests and then reordering all tests during the next execution. By reordering the tests, high core count machines run faster, sometimes significantly so.
This patch also always runs failing tests first, which is a positive user experience win for those that didn't know about the hidden `--incremental` flag.
Finally, if users want, they can _optionally_ commit the test timing data (or a subset thereof) back to the repository to accelerate bots and first-time runs of the test suite.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98179
|
|
For some build configurations, `check-all` calls lit multiple times to
run multiple lit test suites. Most recently, I've found this to be
true when configuring openmp as part of `LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES`, but
this is not the first time.
If one test suite fails, none of the remaining test suites run, so you
cannot determine if your patch has broken them. It can then be
frustrating to try to determine which `check-` targets will run the
remaining tests without getting stuck on the failing tests.
When such cases arise, it is probably best to adjust the cmake
configuration for `check-all` to run all test suites as part of one
lit invocation. Because that fix will likely not be implemented and
land immediately, this patch introduces `--ignore-fail` to serve as a
workaround for developers trying to see test results until it does
land:
```
$ LIT_OPTS=--ignore-fail ninja check-all
```
One problem with `--ignore-fail` is that it makes it challenging to
detect test failures in a script, perhaps in CI. This problem should
serve as motivation to actually fix the cmake configuration instead of
continuing to use `--ignore-fail` indefinitely.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, thopre
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96371
|
|
In semi-automated environments, XFAILing or filtering out known regressions without actually committing changes or temporarily modifying the test suite can be quite useful.
Reviewed By: yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96662
|
|
With enough cores, the slowest tests can significantly change the total testing time if they happen to run late. With this change, a test suite can improve performance (for high-end systems) by listing just a few of the slowest tests up front.
Reviewed By: jdenny, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96594
|
|
Some test systems do not use lit for test discovery but only for its
substitution and test selection because they use another way of managing
test collections, e.g. CTest. This forces those tests to be invoked with
lit --no-indirectly-run-check. When a mix of lit version is in use, it
requires to detect the availability of that option.
This commit provides a new config option standalone_tests to signal a
directory made of tests meant to run as standalone. When this option is
set, lit skips test discovery and the indirectly run check. It also adds
the missing documentation for --no-indirectly-run-check.
Reviewed By: jdenny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94766
|
|
|
|
Reviewed By: yln
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82808
|
|
|
|
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The LitConfig is shared across the whole test suite. However, since
enabling recursive expansion can be a breaking change for some test
suites, it's important to confine the setting to test suites that
enable it explicitly.
Note that other issues were raised with the way recursiveExpansionLimit
operates. However, this commit simply moves the setting to the right
place -- the mechanism by which it works can be improved independently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77415
|
|
This allows defining substitutions in terms of other substitutions. For
example, a %build substitution could be defined in terms of a %cxx
substitution as '%cxx %s -o %t.exe' and the script would be properly
expanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76178
|
|
These result codes already exist, but they were not documented. I assume
this is an oversight when adding these result codes.
|
|
Reviewers: hans, Jim
Reviewed By: Jim
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, arphaman, bmahjour, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73017
|
|
|
