Reapply (2) [BranchFolding] Kill common hoisted debug instructions (#149999)

Reapply #140091.

branch-folder hoists common instructions from TBB and FBB into their
pred. Without this patch it achieves this by splicing the instructions from TBB
and deleting the common ones in FBB. That moves the debug locations and debug
instructions from TBB into the pred without modification, which is not
ideal. Debug locations are handled in #140063.

This patch handles debug instructions - in the simplest way possible, which is
to just kill (undef) them. We kill and hoist the ones in FBB as well as TBB
because otherwise the fact there's an assignment on the code path is deleted
(which might lead to a prior location extending further than it should).

There's possibly something we could do to preserve some variable locations in
some cases, but this is the easiest not-incorrect thing to do.

Note I had to replace the constant DBG_VALUEs to use registers in the test- it
turns out setDebugValueUndef doesn't undef constant DBG_VALUEs... which feels
wrong to me, but isn't something I want to touch right now.

---

Fix end-iterator-dereference and add test.

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
index 3b3e7a4..a7c99b1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/BranchFolding.cpp
@@ -2083,22 +2083,54 @@ bool BranchFolder::HoistCommonCodeInSuccs(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
   if (TBB == FBB) {
     MBB->splice(Loc, TBB, TBB->begin(), TIB);
   } else {
+    // Merge the debug locations, and hoist and kill the debug instructions from
+    // both branches. FIXME: We could probably try harder to preserve some debug
+    // instructions (but at least this isn't producing wrong locations).
+    MachineInstrBuilder MIRBuilder(*MBB->getParent(), Loc);
+    auto HoistAndKillDbgInstr = [MBB, Loc](MachineBasicBlock::iterator DI) {
+      assert(DI->isDebugInstr() && "Expected a debug instruction");
+      if (DI->isDebugRef()) {
+        const TargetInstrInfo *TII =
+            MBB->getParent()->getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
+        const MCInstrDesc &DBGV = TII->get(TargetOpcode::DBG_VALUE);
+        DI = BuildMI(*MBB->getParent(), DI->getDebugLoc(), DBGV, false, 0,
+                     DI->getDebugVariable(), DI->getDebugExpression());
+        MBB->insert(Loc, &*DI);
+        return;
+      }
+      // Deleting a DBG_PHI results in an undef at the referenced DBG_INSTR_REF.
+      if (DI->isDebugPHI()) {
+        DI->eraseFromParent();
+        return;
+      }
+
+      DI->setDebugValueUndef();
+      DI->moveBefore(&*Loc);
+    };
+
     // TIB and FIB point to the end of the regions to hoist/merge in TBB and
     // FBB.
     MachineBasicBlock::iterator FE = FIB;
     MachineBasicBlock::iterator FI = FBB->begin();
     for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator TI :
          make_early_inc_range(make_range(TBB->begin(), TIB))) {
-      // Move debug instructions and pseudo probes without modifying them.
-      // FIXME: This is the wrong thing to do for debug locations, which
-      // should at least be killed (and hoisted from BOTH blocks).
-      if (TI->isDebugOrPseudoInstr()) {
-        TI->moveBefore(&*Loc);
+      // Hoist and kill debug instructions from FBB. After this loop FI points
+      // to the next non-debug instruction to hoist (checked in assert after the
+      // TBB debug instruction handling code).
+      while (FI != FE && FI->isDebugInstr())
+        HoistAndKillDbgInstr(FI++);
+
+      // Kill debug instructions before moving.
+      if (TI->isDebugInstr()) {
+        HoistAndKillDbgInstr(TI);
         continue;
       }
 
-      // Get the next non-meta instruction in FBB.
-      FI = skipDebugInstructionsForward(FI, FE, false);
+      // FI and TI now point to identical non-debug instructions.
+      assert(FI != FE && "Unexpected end of FBB range");
+      // Pseudo probes are excluded from the range when identifying foldable
+      // instructions, so we don't expect to see one now.
+      assert(!TI->isPseudoProbe() && "Unexpected pseudo probe in range");
       // NOTE: The loop above checks CheckKillDead but we can't do that here as
       // it modifies some kill markers after the check.
       assert(TI->isIdenticalTo(*FI, MachineInstr::CheckDefs) &&
@@ -2111,6 +2143,7 @@ bool BranchFolder::HoistCommonCodeInSuccs(MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
       ++FI;
     }
   }
+
   FBB->erase(FBB->begin(), FIB);
 
   if (UpdateLiveIns)