1. Sep 10, 2016
  2. Sep 09, 2016
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Implement py::init_alias<>() constructors · ec62d977
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      This commit adds support for forcing alias type initialization by
      defining constructors with `py::init_alias<arg1, arg2>()` instead of
      `py::init<arg1, arg2>()`.  Currently py::init<> only results in Alias
      initialization if the type is extended in python, or the given
      arguments can't be used to construct the base type, but can be used to
      construct the alias.  py::init_alias<>, in contrast, always invokes the
      constructor of the alias type.
      
      It looks like this was already the intention of
      `py::detail::init_alias`, which was forward-declared in
      86d825f3, but was apparently never
      finished: despite the existance of a .def method accepting it, the
      `detail::init_alias` class isn't actually defined anywhere.
      
      This commit completes the feature (or possibly repurposes it), allowing
      declaration of classes that will always initialize the trampoline which
      is (as I argued in #397) sometimes useful.
      ec62d977
    • Wenzel Jakob's avatar
      Merge pull request #401 from jagerman/templates-simplification · 356bf94a
      Wenzel Jakob authored
      Small template simplifications
      356bf94a
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Template simplifications · 5aa2cd5e
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      Switch count_t to use constexpr_sum (under non-MSVC), and then make
      all_of_t/any_of_t use it instead of doing the sum itself.
      
      For MSVC, count_t is still done using template recursion, but
      all_of_t/any_of_t can also make use of it.
      5aa2cd5e
  3. Sep 08, 2016
  4. Sep 07, 2016
    • Wenzel Jakob's avatar
      Intel compiler 2017 fix · 8706fb90
      Wenzel Jakob authored
      8706fb90
    • Wenzel Jakob's avatar
      Merge pull request #385 from jagerman/relax-class-arguments · 6fd3132e
      Wenzel Jakob authored
      Allow arbitrary class_ template option ordering
      6fd3132e
    • Wenzel Jakob's avatar
      Merge pull request #391 from dean0x7d/cout-to-print · 837fda20
      Wenzel Jakob authored
      Replace std::cout with py::print in tests
      837fda20
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Allow passing base types as a template parameter · 6b52c838
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      This allows a slightly cleaner base type specification of:
      
          py::class_<Type, Base>("Type")
      
      as an alternative to
      
          py::class_<Type>("Type", py::base<Base>())
      
      As with the other template parameters, the order relative to the holder
      or trampoline types doesn't matter.
      
      This also includes a compile-time assertion failure if attempting to
      specify more than one base class (but is easily extendible to support
      multiple inheritance, someday, by updating the class_selector::set_bases
      function to set multiple bases).
      6b52c838
    • Dean Moldovan's avatar
      Replace std::cout with py::print in tests · 81511be3
      Dean Moldovan authored
      With this change both C++ and Python write to sys.stdout which resolves
      the capture issues noted in #351. Therefore, the related workarounds are
      removed.
      81511be3
    • Jason Rhinelander's avatar
      Allow arbitrary class_ template option ordering · 5fffe200
      Jason Rhinelander authored
      The current pybind11::class_<Type, Holder, Trampoline> fixed template
      ordering results in a requirement to repeat the Holder with its default
      value (std::unique_ptr<Type>) argument, which is a little bit annoying:
      it needs to be specified not because we want to override the default,
      but rather because we need to specify the third argument.
      
      This commit removes this limitation by making the class_ template take
      the type name plus a parameter pack of options.  It then extracts the
      first valid holder type and the first subclass type for holder_type and
      trampoline type_alias, respectively.  (If unfound, both fall back to
      their current defaults, `std::unique_ptr<type>` and `type`,
      respectively).  If any unmatched template arguments are provided, a
      static assertion fails.
      
      What this means is that you can specify or omit the arguments in any
      order:
      
          py::class_<A, PyA> c1(m, "A");
          py::class_<B, PyB, std::shared_ptr<B>> c2(m, "B");
          py::class_<C, std::shared_ptr<C>, PyB> c3(m, "C");
      
      It also allows future class attributes (such as base types in the next
      commit) to be passed as class template types rather than needing to use
      a py::base<> wrapper.
      5fffe200
  5. Sep 06, 2016