- Dec 11, 2022
-
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
- Dec 10, 2022
-
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Sanjay Patel authored
There was a code comment about detecting min/max, and we were already doing that later. The real motivation is hinted at by the new TODO comment. I'm hoping to untangle some FMF ambiguity in follow-on patches. See discussion in issue #59279. There are enough unknowns in FMF handling that I can't say with certainty that this change is NFC, but it doesn't cause any existing regression tests to change.
-
Sanjay Patel authored
The existing variants have "nsz", but that's not enough to get fabs/fneg semantics right with a NAN input, so I duplicated those with "nnan" tacked on. See discussion in issue #59279.
-
Alexandros Lamprineas authored
Reland 877a9f9a since D138654 (parent) has been fixed with 9ebaf4fe and with 8f1e11c5. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126455
-
Mark de Wever authored
-
Owen Pan authored
This reverts commit e33243c9 but keeps the added test case and also adds another test case. Fixes #59417. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139760
-
Fangrui Song authored
The option does not change IR but affect object file generation. Without a backend option the option is a no-op for in-process ThinLTO. The problem is known and there are many options similar to -fstack-size-section. That said, -fstack-size-section has relatively wider adoption, so it probably makes sense to have custom code for it. Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59424
-
Mehdi Amini authored
Reviewed By: rriddle Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139769
-
Mehdi Amini authored
As a cornerstone of MLIR, this deserves more than the current few lines. Reviewed By: rriddle Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139689
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
Kazu Hirata authored
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to std::optional: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
-
gonglingqin authored
These intrinsics are required by Linux [1]. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/loongarch/include/asm/loongarch.h#n240 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139612
-
Peiming Liu authored
To fix "PerfJITEventListener.cpp:208:32: warning: missing field 'Version' initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]" Reviewed By: ezhulenev Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139754
-