This selects MVE VQADD from the vector llvm.sadd.sat or llvm.uadd.sat
intrinsics.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68566

llvm-svn: 374336

This test was previously passing because myabs was actually emitted into the
debug information and we called that. The test itself was broken as it didn't
use the libc++ directory structure (the /v1/ directory was just called /include/).

This patch gives myabs a default argument which we can't get from debug information
and inlines the function to make sure we can't call it from LLDB without loading
the C++ module.

llvm-svn: 374335

llvm-svn: 374334

llvm-svn: 374333

The only condition that isecLoc becomes null is

  Out::bufferStart == nullptr,
  isec->getParent()->offset == 0, and
  isec->outSecOff == 0.

We can check the first condition only once.

llvm-svn: 374332

The "b" (binary) flag is meaningless most of the time, but the relevant
standars allow it. The standards permit one to spell it both as "r+b"
and "rb+", so handle both cases.

This fixes TestFileHandle.test_binary_inout with python2.

llvm-svn: 374331

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, rogfer01, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68784

llvm-svn: 374330

isecLoc there can be null, but at the same time isec->getSize() may
be non-null. It is UB to offset a nullptr.The most straight-forward fix
here appears to perform casts+normal integral arithmetics.

FAIL: lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test (1158 of 2217)
******************** TEST 'lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 2';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/yaml2obj /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test.tmp.o
: 'RUN: at line 3';   not /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/ld.lld /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test.tmp.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test:4:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
# CHECK: error: unknown relocation (1024) against symbol foo
         ^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp:100:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
<stdin>:1:118: note: possible intended match here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp:100:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
                                                                                                                     ^

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.
FAIL: lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test (1270 of 2217)
******************** TEST 'lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 2';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/yaml2obj /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp1.o
: 'RUN: at line 3';   echo ".global foo; foo:" > /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.s
: 'RUN: at line 4';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/llvm-mc /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.s -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.o -filetype=obj -triple x86_64-pc-linux
: 'RUN: at line 5';   not /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/ld.lld /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp1.o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/lld/test/ELF/invalid/Output/invalid-relocation-x64.test.tmp2.o -o /dev/null 2>&1 | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test:6:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
# CHECK: error: unknown relocation (152) against symbol foo
         ^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp:100:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
^
<stdin>:1:118: note: possible intended match here
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/lld/ELF/Target.cpp:100:41: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 24 to null pointer
                                                                                                                     ^

--

********************
Testing:  0.. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 20.73s
********************
Failing Tests (2):
    lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-aarch64.test
    lld :: ELF/invalid/invalid-relocation-x64.test

llvm-svn: 374329

The existing code is not defined, you are not allowed
to produce non-null pointer from null pointer (F->FileSortedDecls here).
That being said, i'm not really confident this is fix-enough, but we'll see.

FAIL: Clang :: Modules/no-module-map.cpp (6879 of 16079)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: Modules/no-module-map.cpp' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 1';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-name=ab -x c++-header /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map/a.h /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map/b.h -emit-header-module -o /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm
: 'RUN: at line 2';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify
: 'RUN: at line 3';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DA
: 'RUN: at line 4';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DB
: 'RUN: at line 5';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -fmodules-ts -fmodule-file=/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp -I/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/no-module-map -verify -DA -DB
: 'RUN: at line 7';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -E /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm -o - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp
: 'RUN: at line 8';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/lib/clang/10.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc -frewrite-imports -E /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/no-module-map.cpp.tmp.pcm -o - | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/test/Modules/no-module-map.cpp
--
Exit Code: 2

Command Output (stderr):
--
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 8 to null pointer
    #0 0x3a9bd0c in clang::ASTReader::ReadSLocEntry(int) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50
    #1 0x328b6f8 in clang::SourceManager::loadSLocEntry(unsigned int, bool*) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp:461:28
    #2 0x328b351 in clang::SourceManager::initializeForReplay(clang::SourceManager const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp:399:11
    #3 0x3996c71 in clang::FrontendAction::BeginSourceFile(clang::CompilerInstance&, clang::FrontendInputFile const&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendAction.cpp:581:27
    #4 0x394f341 in clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp:956:13
    #5 0x3a8a92b in clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/FrontendTool/ExecuteCompilerInvocation.cpp:290:25
    #6 0xaf8d62 in cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*, void*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/cc1_main.cpp:250:15
    #7 0xaf1602 in ExecuteCC1Tool /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:309:12
    #8 0xaf1602 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/tools/driver/driver.cpp:382:12
    #9 0x7f2c1eecc2e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #10 0xad57f9 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/bin/clang-10+0xad57f9)

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp:1526:50 in
llvm-svn: 374328

This test is not defined.

FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations (178 of 33926)
******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from ArrayRefTest
[ RUN      ] ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 9223372036854775806 to null pointer
    #0 0x5ae8dc in llvm::ArrayRef<char>::slice(unsigned long, unsigned long) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32
    #1 0x5ae44c in (anonymous namespace)::ArrayRefTest_SizeTSizedOperations_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp:85:3
    #2 0x928a96 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474:5
    #3 0x929793 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
    #4 0x92a152 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
    #5 0x9319d2 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
    #6 0x931416 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257:10
    #7 0x920ac3 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
    #8 0x920ac3 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50:10
    #9 0x7f66135b72e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
    #10 0x472c19 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/unittests/ADT/ADTTests+0x472c19)

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32 in
llvm-svn: 374327

llvm-svn: 374326

Summary:
This patch introduces a switch, based on the environment variable
`LLDB_USE_LLDB_SERVER`, to determine whether to use the `ProcessWindows` plugin
(the old way) or the `lldb-server` way for debugging on Windows.

Reviewers: labath, amccarth, asmith, stella.stamenova

Reviewed By: labath, amccarth

Subscribers: mstorsjo, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68258

llvm-svn: 374325

This reverts commit f6777964.

Because the absolute path check relies on temporary path containing
"clang", "test" and "CoverageMapping" as a subsequence, which is not
necessarily true on all systems(breaks internal integrates). Wanted to
fix it by checking for a leading "/" instead, but then noticed that it
would break windows tests, so leaving it to the author instead.

llvm-svn: 374324

the exceptions returned differ between swig4 (TypeError) and swig<=3
(NotImplementedError). Just check for the base Exception class instead.

Theoretically we could switch on the swig version and expect the precise
type directly, but checking the exact type does not seem that important.

Thanks to Raphael for helping me figure this out.

llvm-svn: 374322

llvm-svn: 374321

EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build was failing on new test.
This is fixed by marking $ra register as undef.
Test now has -verify-machineinstrs to check for operand flags.

llvm-svn: 374320

Summary:
llvm-ar's mri-utf8.test test relies on the en_US.UTF-8 locale to be
installed for its last RUN line to work. If not installed, the unicode
string gets encoded (interpreted) as ascii which fails since the most
significant byte is non zero. This commit changes the test to only rely
on the system being able to encode the pound sign in its default
encoding (e.g. UTF-16 for Microsoft Windows) by always opening the file
via input/output redirection. This avoids forcing a given locale to be
present and supported. A Byte Order Mark is also added to help
recognizing the encoding of the file and its endianness.

Reviewers: gbreynoo, MaskRay, rupprecht, JamesNagurne, jfb

Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68472

llvm-svn: 374318

llvm-svn: 374316

- Available from 12.x branch, by the time it lands next year in FreeBSD tree, the 11.x's might be EOL.
- Intentionally changed the getrandom test to C code as with 12.0 (might be fixed in CURRENT since), there is a linkage issue in C++ context.

Reviewers: emaste, dim, vitalybuka

Reviewed-By: vitalybuka

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68451

llvm-svn: 374315

Similar to D67323, but for COFF. Many lld/COFF/ files already use
`namespace lld { namespace coff {`. Only a few need changing.

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68772

llvm-svn: 374314

Summary:
The SearchCallback has a bool parameter that we always set to false, we never use in any callback implementation and that also changes its name
from one file to the other (either `containing` and `complete`). It was added in the original LLDB check in, so there isn't any history what
this was supposed to be, so let's just remove it.

Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, labath

Reviewed By: jingham, labath

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68696

llvm-svn: 374313

Summary:
The `if (*cstr_end == '\0')` in the previous code checked if the previous loop terminated because it
found a null terminator or because it reached the end of the data. However, in the case that we hit
the end of the data before finding a null terminator, `cstr_end` points behind the last byte in our
data and `*cstr_end` reads the memory behind the array (which may be uninitialised)

This patch just rewrites that function use `std::find` and adds the relevant unit tests.

Reviewers: labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68773

llvm-svn: 374311

llvm-svn: 374309

As it was breaking bots running sanitizer lint check

This reverts r374265 (git b577efe4)

llvm-svn: 374308

llvm-svn: 374307

I do not understand the BB failire, it fully passes locally.

llvm-svn: 374306

Currently, the heuristics the if-conversion pass uses for diamond if-conversion
are based on execution time, with no consideration for code size. This adds a
new set of heuristics to be used when optimising for code size.

This is mostly target-independent, because the if-conversion pass can
see the code size of the instructions which it is removing. For thumb,
there are a few passes (insertion of IT instructions, selection of
narrow branches, and selection of CBZ instructions) which are run after
if conversion and affect these heuristics, so I've added target hooks to
better predict the code-size effect of a proposed if-conversion.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67350

llvm-svn: 374301

The test isn't using @expectedFailure correctly, which causes weird
errors, at least with python2, at least with linux. Possibly that
function shouldn't even be public as it's main use is as a backed for
other decorators.

llvm-svn: 374299

[UBSan] Revisit nullptr-and-nonzero-offset-variable.cpp test to hopefully make it pass on sanitizer-windows BB

llvm-svn: 374298

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68768

llvm-svn: 374297

Other options which create output files don't produce output messages.
Improve documentation to help find trace file.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68710

llvm-svn: 374294

Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4     When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
      from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
      the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
      elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
      (where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
      element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
      (possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```

Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)

To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".

Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566

Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.

`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown

Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers

Reviewed By: rsmith

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122

llvm-svn: 374293

GNU ld looks for a number of other patterns than just lib<name>.dll.a
and lib<name>.a.

GNU ld does support linking directly against a DLL without using an
import library. If that's the only match for a -l argument, point out
that the user needs to use an import library, instead of leaving the
user with a puzzling message about the -l argument not being found
at all.

Also convert an existing case of fatal() into error().

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68689

llvm-svn: 374292

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68688

llvm-svn: 374291

This patch adds a section name to error messages.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68758

llvm-svn: 374290

llvm-svn: 374289

This was further discussed at the llvm dev list:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135602.html

I think the brief summary of that is that this change is an improvement,
this is the behaviour that we expect and promise in ours docs, and also
as a result there are cases where we now emit diagnostics whereas before
pragmas were silently ignored. Two areas where we can improve: 1) the
diagnostic message itself, and 2) and in some cases (e.g. -Os and -Oz)
the vectoriser is (quite understandably) not triggering.

Original commit message:

Specifying the vectorization width was supposed to implicitly enable
vectorization, except that it wasn't really doing this. It was only
setting the vectorize.width metadata, but not vectorize.enable.

This should fix PR27643.

llvm-svn: 374288

Some clang lit tests use a pipeline of the form

// RUN: %clang [args] -O0 %s | opt [specific optimizations] | FileCheck %s

to make the expected test output depend on as few optimization phases
as possible, for stability. But when you write a RUN line of this
form, you lose the ability to use update_cc_test_checks.py to
automatically generate the expected output, because it only supports
two-stage pipelines consisting of '%clang | FileCheck' (or %clang_cc1).

This change extends the set of supported RUN lines so that pipelines
with an invocation of `opt` in the middle can still be automatically
handled.

To implement it, I've adjusted `get_function_body()` so that it can
cope with an arbitrary sequence of intermediate pipeline commands. But
the code that decides which RUN lines to consider is more
conservative: it only adds clang | opt | FileCheck to the set of
supported lines, because I didn't want to accidentally include some
other kind of line that doesn't output IR at all.

(Also in this commit is the minimal change to make this script work at
all, after r373912 added an extra parameter to `add_ir_checks`.)

Reviewers: MaskRay, xbolva00

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68406

llvm-svn: 374287

Summary:

bug : https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43601

Reviewers: rnk

Reviewed By: rnk

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68716

llvm-svn: 374285

SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.

llvm-svn: 374284