Push `FileEntryRef` and `DirectoryEntryRef` further, using it them
`Module::Umbrella`, `Module::Header::Entry`, and
`Module::DirectoryName::Entry`.

- Add `DirectoryEntryRef::operator const DirectoryEntry *` and
  `OptionalDirectoryEntryRefDegradesToDirectoryEntryPtr`, to get the
  same "degrades to `DirectoryEntry*` behaviour `FileEntryRef` enjoys
  (this avoids a bunch of churn in various clang tools).
- Fix the `DirectoryEntryRef` constructor from `MapEntry` to take it by
  `const&`.

Note that we cannot get rid of the `...AsWritten` names leveraging the
new classes, since these need to be as written in the `ModuleMap` file
and the module directory path is preprended for the lookup in the
`FileManager`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90497

An indirect call site needs to be probed for its potential call targets. With CSSPGO a direct call also needs a probe so that a calling context can be represented by a stack of callsite probes. Unlike pseudo probes for basic blocks that are in form of standalone intrinsic call instructions, pseudo probes for callsites have to be attached to the call instruction, thus a separate instruction would not work.

One possible way of attaching a probe to a call instruction is to use a special metadata that carries information about the probe. The special metadata will have to make its way through the optimization pipeline down to object emission. This requires additional efforts to maintain the metadata in various places. Given that the `!dbg` metadata is a first-class metadata and has all essential support in place , leveraging the `!dbg` metadata as a channel to encode pseudo probe information is probably the easiest solution.

With the requirement of not inflating `!dbg` metadata that is allocated for almost every instruction, we found that the 32-bit DWARF discriminator field which mainly serves AutoFDO can be reused for pseudo probes. DWARF discriminators distinguish identical source locations between instructions and with pseudo probes such support is not required. In this change we are using the discriminator field to encode the ID and type of a callsite probe and the encoded value will be unpacked and consumed right before object emission. When a callsite is inlined, the callsite discriminator field will go with the inlined instructions. The `!dbg` metadata of an inlined instruction is in form of a scope stack. The top of the stack is the instruction's original `!dbg` metadata and the bottom of the stack is for the original callsite of the top-level inliner. Except for the top of the stack, all other elements of the stack actually refer to the nested inlined callsites whose discriminator field (which actually represents a calliste probe) can be used together to represent the inline context of an inlined PseudoProbeInst or CallInst.

To avoid collision with the baseline AutoFDO in various places that handles dwarf discriminators where a check against  the `-pseudo-probe-for-profiling` switch is not available, a special encoding scheme is used to tell apart a pseudo probe discriminator from a regular discriminator. For the regular discriminator, if all lowest 3 bits are non-zero, it means the discriminator is basically empty and all higher 29 bits can be reversed for pseudo probe use.

Callsite pseudo probes are inserted in `SampleProfileProbePass` and a target-independent MIR pass `PseudoProbeInserter` is added to unpack the probe ID/type from `!dbg`.

Note that with this work the switch -debug-info-for-profiling will not work with -pseudo-probe-for-profiling anymore. They cannot be used at the same time.

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91756

At D92261, this type will be used to cache both combined shadow and
converted shadow values.

Reviewed-by: morehouse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92458

This covers a branch in the loadShadow method.

Reviewed-by: morehouse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92460

This patch implements correct hostness based overloading resolution
in isBetterOverloadCandidate.

Based on hostness, if one candidate is emittable whereas the other
candidate is not emittable, the emittable candidate is better.

If both candidates are emittable, or neither is emittable based on hostness, then
other rules should be used to determine which is better. This is because
hostness based overloading resolution is mostly for determining
viability of a function. If two functions are both viable, other factors
should take precedence in preference.

If other rules cannot determine which is better, CUDA preference will be
used again to determine which is better.

However, correct hostness based overloading resolution
requires overloading resolution diagnostics to be deferred,
which is not on by default. The rationale is that deferring
overloading resolution diagnostics may hide overloading reslolutions
issues in header files.

An option -fgpu-exclude-wrong-side-overloads is added, which is off by
default.

When -fgpu-exclude-wrong-side-overloads is off, keep the original behavior,
that is, exclude wrong side overloads only if there are same side overloads.
This may result in incorrect overloading resolution when there are no
same side candates, but is sufficient for most CUDA/HIP applications.

When -fgpu-exclude-wrong-side-overloads is on, enable deferring
overloading resolution diagnostics and enable correct hostness
based overloading resolution, i.e., always exclude wrong side overloads.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80450

Android has a handful of API levels relevant to developers described
here: https://developer.android.com/studio/build#module-level.
`__ANDROID_API__` is too vague and confuses a lot of people. Introduce
a new macro name that is explicit about which one it represents. Keep
the old name around because code has been using it for a decade.

This is a child diff of D92261.

This locks down the behavior before the change.

Clear up documentation on dialect attribute values. Fix/improve
ModuleOp verifier error message on dialect prefixed attribute names.
Additional discussion is here:
https://llvm.discourse.group/t/moduleop-attributes/2325

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92502

Jon Caves.

Out-of-line helper functions to support LSE deployment added.
This is a port of libgcc implementation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;h=33befddcb849235353dc263db1c7d07dc15c9faa

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91156

Summary:
Not all system assembler supports `.uleb128 label2 - label1` form.
When the target do not support this form, we have to take
alternative manual calculation to get the offsets from them.

Reviewed By: hubert.reinterpretcast

Diffierential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92058

The canonical Fuchsia toolchain configuration installs llvm-elfabi.

Reviewed By: haowei

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92444

This is consistent with other platforms' versions and
eliminates a compiler warning.

Reviewed By: leonardchan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92442

These two cases are fixed:
1. If numerator is not zero and denominator is infinity, then the
numerator is returned as the remainder.
2. If numerator and denominator are equal in magnitude, then quotient
with the right sign is returned.

The differet tests of remquo, remquof and remquol have been unified
into a single file to avoid duplication.

Reviewed By: lntue

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92353

It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an attribute((no_stack_protector)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.

While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u

SSP attributes can be ordered by strength. Weakest to strongest, they
are: ssp, sspstrong, sspreq.  Callees with differing SSP attributes may be
inlined into each other, and the strongest attribute will be applied to the
caller. (No change)

After this change:
* A callee with no SSP attributes will no longer be inlined into a
  caller with SSP attributes.
* The reverse is also true: a callee with an SSP attribute will not be
  inlined into a caller with no SSP attributes.
* The alwaysinline attribute overrides these rules.

Functions that get synthesized by the compiler may not get inlined as a
result if they are not created with the same stack protector function
attribute as their callers.

Alternative approach to https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956

.

Fixes pr/47479.

Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91816

Add the slice_array::operator=(const std::valarray<T>& val_arr) overload.

Fixes https://llvm.org/PR40792.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58735

Summary:
AIX uses the existing EH infrastructure in clang and llvm.
The major differences would be
1. AIX do not have CFI instructions.
2. AIX uses a new personality routine, named __xlcxx_personality_v1.
   It doesn't use the GCC personality rountine, because the
   interoperability is not there yet on AIX.
3. AIX do not use eh_frame sections. Instead, it would use a eh_info
section (compat unwind section) to store the information about
personality routine and LSDA data address.

Reviewed By: daltenty, hubert.reinterpretcast

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91455

https://llvm.org/PR48362

It's possible that we could stub this out sooner somewhere
within JumpThreading, but I'm not sure how to do that, and
then we would still have potential danger in other callers.

I can't find a way to trigger this using 'instsimplify',
however, because that already has a bailout on unreachable
blocks.

`GetTopLevelUnitContaining` returns the Scope nested in the global scope
that contains the given Scope or Symbol.

Use "Get" rather than "Find" in the name because "Find" implies it might
not be found, which can't happen. Following that logic, rename
`FindProgramUnitContaining` to `GetProgramUnitContaining` and have it
also return a reference rather that a pointer.

Note that the use of "ProgramUnit" is slightly confusing. In the Fortran
standard, "program-unit" refers to what is called a "TopLevelUnit" here.
What we are calling a "ProgramUnit" (here and in `ProgramTree`) includes
internal subprograms while "TopLevelUnit" does not.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92491

Add "REQUIRES: asserts" as the test uses the "--debug-only" switch

Should fix the clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu buildbot failure

Helps to reduce diff in D90113

Helps to reduce diff in D90113

GCC<5 did not support std::is_trivially_copyable. Now LLVM builds
require 5.1 we can delete llvm::is_trivially_copyable after the users
have been migrated to std::is_trivially_copyable.

GCC<5 did not support std::is_trivially_copyable. Now LLVM builds require 5.1
we can migrate to std::is_trivially_copyable.

Its unlikely an undef element in a zero vector will be any use.

Fixes build on gnux32 hosts

The LateInit test might be reusing some already initialized thread
specific data if run within the main thread. This means that there
is a chance that the current value will not be enough for the 100
iterations, hence the test flaking.

Fix this by making the test run in its own thread.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92415

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92474

Its unlikely an undef element in a zero vector will be any use, and SimplifyDemandedVectorElts now calls combineX86ShufflesRecursively so its unlikely we actually have a dependency on these specific elements.

Avoid use of X32 check prefix - we try to only use that for gnux32 triple tests