diff options
| author | Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> | 2013-12-04 08:19:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | lzeng14 <lzeng14@6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524> | 2013-12-04 08:19:02 +0000 |
| commit | 060853f7aa578af06a86f20216b1df71a82531ab (patch) | |
| tree | fcbcb07a071eb1c6e4b719fba699ea67e6a2deb4 /StdLib/ReadMe.txt | |
| parent | 5ab7f883fb46f23114951d644d457eb854b8e977 (diff) | |
| download | edk2-060853f7aa578af06a86f20216b1df71a82531ab.zip edk2-060853f7aa578af06a86f20216b1df71a82531ab.tar.gz edk2-060853f7aa578af06a86f20216b1df71a82531ab.tar.bz2 | |
MdeModulePkg: SmmLockBox: remove wrong DepEx
The SmmLockBox driver in
"MdeModulePkg/Universal/LockBox/SmmLockBox/SmmLockBox.inf" currently
specifies a DepEx on EFI_SMM_SW_DISPATCH2_PROTOCOL.
However, the driver doesn't use this protocol at all, either directly or
indirectly. It calls SmiHandlerRegister()
[MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/Smi.c] to register SmmLockBoxHandler()
(which serves LockBox requests).
In turn, the SMM Core function SmiHandlerRegister() is also implemented
without EFI_SMM_SW_DISPATCH2_PROTOCOL.
The DepEx has been present since the initial commit of the SmmLockBox
driver (SVN r12029); it is probably superfluous. Let's remove it.
(Alternatively, we could extend OvmfPkg/EmuSmmDxe to fake this protocol,
and return EFI_UNSUPPORTED when any member is called.)
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
git-svn-id: https://svn.code.sf.net/p/edk2/code/trunk/edk2@14930 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
Diffstat (limited to 'StdLib/ReadMe.txt')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions