aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>2018-02-09 15:24:57 +0000
committerJon Turney <jon.turney@dronecode.org.uk>2018-02-15 12:51:25 +0000
commit56286fd2b84eb28605314ef7bd587394a9156b63 (patch)
tree82133ed80e3c25ff1d78d759222a6fd0216ca810 /mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py
parent9e6d3f903c7e828823eb4544c83bf340ff593f95 (diff)
downloadmeson-56286fd2b84eb28605314ef7bd587394a9156b63.zip
meson-56286fd2b84eb28605314ef7bd587394a9156b63.tar.gz
meson-56286fd2b84eb28605314ef7bd587394a9156b63.tar.bz2
Fix test cases/failing/52 inconsistent comparison
Since PR #2884, this is failing with an exception Keep the behaviour we have had since PR #1810 (0.41.0), that ordering comparisons of different types fail with an InterpreterException. Also warn about equality comparisons of different types, which will one day become an error, as per PR #2884.
Diffstat (limited to 'mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py')
-rw-r--r--mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py19
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py b/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py
index 6618dc8..2234e54 100644
--- a/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py
+++ b/mesonbuild/interpreterbase.py
@@ -267,9 +267,8 @@ class InterpreterBase:
def validate_comparison_types(self, val1, val2):
if type(val1) != type(val2):
- mlog.warning('''Trying to compare values of different types ({}, {}).
-The result of this is undefined and will become a hard error
-in a future Meson release.'''.format(type(val1).__name__, type(val2).__name__))
+ return False
+ return True
def evaluate_comparison(self, node):
val1 = self.evaluate_statement(node.left)
@@ -278,11 +277,23 @@ in a future Meson release.'''.format(type(val1).__name__, type(val2).__name__))
val2 = self.evaluate_statement(node.right)
if is_disabler(val2):
return val2
- self.validate_comparison_types(val1, val2)
+ valid = self.validate_comparison_types(val1, val2)
+ # Ordering comparisons of different types isn't allowed since PR #1810
+ # (0.41.0). Since PR #2884 we also warn about equality comparisons of
+ # different types, which will one day become an error.
+ if not valid and (node.ctype == '==' or node.ctype == '!='):
+ mlog.warning('''Trying to compare values of different types ({}, {}) using {}.
+The result of this is undefined and will become a hard error
+in a future Meson release.'''.format(type(val1).__name__, type(val2).__name__, node.ctype))
if node.ctype == '==':
return val1 == val2
elif node.ctype == '!=':
return val1 != val2
+ elif not valid:
+ raise InterpreterException(
+ 'Values of different types ({}, {}) cannot be compared using {}.'.format(type(val1).__name__,
+ type(val2).__name__,
+ node.ctype))
elif not self.is_elementary_type(val1):
raise InterpreterException('{} can only be compared for equality.'.format(node.left.value))
elif not self.is_elementary_type(val2):