block: Manipulate bs->file / bs->backing pointers in .attach/.detach

bs->file and bs->backing are a kind of duplication of part of
bs->children. But very useful diplication, so let's not drop them at
all:)

We should manage bs->file and bs->backing in same place, where we
manage bs->children, to keep them in sync.

Moreover, generic io paths are unprepared to BdrvChild without a bs, so
it's double good to clear bs->file / bs->backing when we detach the
child.

Detach is simple: if we detach bs->file or bs->backing child, just
set corresponding field to NULL.

Attach is a bit more complicated. But we still can precisely detect
should we set one of bs->file / bs->backing or not:

- if role is BDRV_CHILD_COW, we definitely deal with bs->backing
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED (it must be also
  BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY), it's a filtered child. Use
  bs->drv->filtered_child_is_backing to chose the pointer field to
  modify.
- else, if role is BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY, we deal with bs->file
- in all other cases, it's neither bs->backing nor bs->file. It's some
  other child and we shouldn't care

OK. This change brings one more good thing: we can (and should) get rid
of all indirect pointers in the block-graph-change transactions:

bdrv_attach_child_common() stores BdrvChild** into transaction to clear
it on abort.

bdrv_attach_child_common() has two callers: bdrv_attach_child_noperm()
just pass-through this feature, bdrv_root_attach_child() doesn't need
the feature.

Look at bdrv_attach_child_noperm() callers:
  - bdrv_attach_child() doesn't need the feature
  - bdrv_set_file_or_backing_noperm() uses the feature to manage
    bs->file and bs->backing, we don't want it anymore
  - bdrv_append() uses the feature to manage bs->backing, again we
    don't want it anymore

So, we should drop this stuff! Great!

We could probably keep BdrvChild** argument to keep the int return
value, but it seems not worth the complexity.

Finally, we now set .file / .backing automatically in generic code and
want to restring setting them by hand outside of .attach/.detach.
So, this patch cleanups all remaining places where they were set.
To find such places I use:

  git grep '\->file ='
  git grep '\->backing ='
  git grep '&.*\<backing\>'
  git grep '&.*\<file\>'

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220726201134.924743-14-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-drain.c b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-drain.c
index 84e09d7..0eecf14 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-drain.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-drain.c
@@ -1830,9 +1830,8 @@ static void test_drop_intermediate_poll(void)
     for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
         if (i) {
             /* Takes the reference to chain[i - 1] */
-            chain[i]->backing = bdrv_attach_child(chain[i], chain[i - 1],
-                                                  "chain", &chain_child_class,
-                                                  BDRV_CHILD_COW, &error_abort);
+            bdrv_attach_child(chain[i], chain[i - 1], "chain",
+                              &chain_child_class, BDRV_CHILD_COW, &error_abort);
         }
     }
 
@@ -2050,9 +2049,8 @@ static void do_test_replace_child_mid_drain(int old_drain_count,
     new_child_bs->total_sectors = 1;
 
     bdrv_ref(old_child_bs);
-    parent_bs->backing = bdrv_attach_child(parent_bs, old_child_bs, "child",
-                                           &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_COW,
-                                           &error_abort);
+    bdrv_attach_child(parent_bs, old_child_bs, "child", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_COW, &error_abort);
 
     for (i = 0; i < old_drain_count; i++) {
         bdrv_drained_begin(old_child_bs);