aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>2025-05-08 17:40:33 +0100
committerDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>2025-05-22 11:24:41 +0100
commit66411ab48b3676894903148406db12a446445adc (patch)
tree5817d69819c0a1a248b29d0cc69702a527851929 /scripts
parent5a56f60d7c2e241bf972b8eca31286cf7f3cd7c1 (diff)
downloadqemu-66411ab48b3676894903148406db12a446445adc.zip
qemu-66411ab48b3676894903148406db12a446445adc.tar.gz
qemu-66411ab48b3676894903148406db12a446445adc.tar.bz2
Revert "scripts: mandate that new files have SPDX-License-Identifier"
This reverts commit fa4d79c64dae03ffa269e42e21822453856618b7. The logic in this commit was flawed in two critical ways * It always failed to report SPDX validation on the last newly added file. IOW, it only worked if at least 2 new files were added in a commit * If an existing file change, followed a new file change, in the commit and the existing file context/changed lines included SPDX-License-Identifier, it would incorrectly associate this with the previous newly added file. Simply reverting this commit will make it significantly easier to understand the improved logic in the following commit. Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
-rwxr-xr-xscripts/checkpatch.pl30
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 365892d..d355c0d 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -1442,8 +1442,6 @@ sub process {
my $in_imported_file = 0;
my $in_no_imported_file = 0;
my $non_utf8_charset = 0;
- my $expect_spdx = 0;
- my $expect_spdx_file;
our @report = ();
our $cnt_lines = 0;
@@ -1681,34 +1679,6 @@ sub process {
WARN("added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?\n" . $herecurr);
}
-# All new files should have a SPDX-License-Identifier tag
- if ($line =~ /^new file mode\s*\d+\s*$/) {
- if ($expect_spdx) {
- if ($expect_spdx_file =~
- /\.(c|h|py|pl|sh|json|inc|Makefile)$/) {
- # source code files MUST have SPDX license declared
- ERROR("New file '$expect_spdx_file' requires " .
- "'SPDX-License-Identifier'");
- } else {
- # Other files MAY have SPDX license if appropriate
- WARN("Does new file '$expect_spdx_file' need " .
- "'SPDX-License-Identifier'?");
- }
- }
- $expect_spdx = 1;
- $expect_spdx_file = undef;
- } elsif ($expect_spdx) {
- $expect_spdx_file = $realfile unless
- defined $expect_spdx_file;
-
- # SPDX tags may occurr in comments which were
- # stripped from '$line', so use '$rawline'
- if ($rawline =~ /SPDX-License-Identifier/) {
- $expect_spdx = 0;
- $expect_spdx_file = undef;
- }
- }
-
# Check SPDX-License-Identifier references a permitted license
if ($rawline =~ m,SPDX-License-Identifier: (.*?)(\*/)?\s*$,) {
&checkspdx($realfile, $1);