aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pc-bios
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>2023-06-27 09:47:03 +0200
committerThomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>2023-06-29 20:45:12 +0200
commit7cd50cbe4ca3e2860b31b06ec92c17c54bd82d48 (patch)
tree4f00e324230460121af96e734ef10a9ba0657282 /pc-bios
parente31f08dc748bad980f2092be165bd091f9cf3c48 (diff)
downloadqemu-7cd50cbe4ca3e2860b31b06ec92c17c54bd82d48.zip
qemu-7cd50cbe4ca3e2860b31b06ec92c17c54bd82d48.tar.gz
qemu-7cd50cbe4ca3e2860b31b06ec92c17c54bd82d48.tar.bz2
pc-bios/s390-ccw: Don't use __bss_start with the "larl" instruction
start.S currently cannot be compiled with Clang 16 and binutils 2.40: ld: start.o(.text+0x8): misaligned symbol `__bss_start' (0xc1e5) for relocation R_390_PC32DBL According to the built-in linker script of ld, the symbol __bss_start can actually point *before* the .bss section and does not need to have any alignment, so in certain situations (like when using the internal assembler of Clang), the __bss_start symbol can indeed be unaligned and thus it is not suitable for being used with the "larl" instruction that needs an address that is at least aligned to halfwords. The problem went unnoticed so far since binutils <= 2.39 did not check the alignment, but starting with binutils 2.40, such unaligned addresses are now refused. Fix it by loading the address indirectly instead. Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2216662 Reported-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Andreas Krebbel <andreas.krebbel@de.ibm.com> Message-Id: <20230629104821.194859-8-thuth@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'pc-bios')
-rw-r--r--pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S
index 429a2b3..061b065 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/start.S
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ _start:
larl %r15,stack + STACK_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_SIZE /* Set up stack */
/* clear bss */
- larl %r2,__bss_start
+ larl %r2,bss_start_literal /* __bss_start might be unaligned ... */
+ lg %r2,0(%r2) /* ... so load it indirectly */
larl %r3,_end
slgr %r3,%r2 /* get sizeof bss */
ltgr %r3,%r3 /* bss empty? */
@@ -45,7 +46,6 @@ done:
memsetxc:
xc 0(1,%r1),0(%r1)
-
/*
* void disabled_wait(void)
*
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ io_new_code:
br %r14
.align 8
+bss_start_literal:
+ .quad __bss_start
disabled_wait_psw:
.quad 0x0002000180000000,0x0000000000000000
enabled_wait_psw: