diff options
author | Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> | 2021-11-12 17:04:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2021-12-15 10:11:34 +0000 |
commit | 229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e (patch) | |
tree | 741c9985b30d5db3c892efd115cb13c5b83a871b /hw | |
parent | 76b56fdfc9fa43ec6e5986aee33f108c6c6a511e (diff) | |
download | qemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.zip qemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.tar.gz qemu-229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e.tar.bz2 |
hw/intc: clean-up error reporting for failed ITS cmd
While trying to debug a GIC ITS failure I saw some guest errors that
had poor formatting as well as leaving me confused as to what failed.
As most of the checks aren't possible without a valid dte split that
check apart and then check the other conditions in steps. This avoids
us relying on undefined data.
I still get a failure with the current kvm-unit-tests but at least I
know (partially) why now:
Exception return from AArch64 EL1 to AArch64 EL1 PC 0x40080588
PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: inv/invall: dev2/eventid=20 now triggers an LPI
ITS: MAPD devid=2 size = 0x8 itt=0x40430000 valid=0
INT dev_id=2 event_id=20
process_its_cmd: invalid command attributes: invalid dte: 0 for 2 (MEM_TX: 0)
PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: mapd valid=false: no LPI after device unmap
SUMMARY: 6 tests, 1 unexpected failures
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20211112170454.3158925-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: Shashi Mallela <shashi.mallela@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'hw')
-rw-r--r-- | hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c | 39 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c index c929a9c..b99e63d 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c @@ -274,21 +274,36 @@ static bool process_its_cmd(GICv3ITSState *s, uint64_t value, uint32_t offset, if (res != MEMTX_OK) { return result; } + } else { + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, + "%s: invalid command attributes: " + "invalid dte: %"PRIx64" for %d (MEM_TX: %d)\n", + __func__, dte, devid, res); + return result; } - if ((devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) || !dte_valid || !ite_valid || - !cte_valid || (eventid > max_eventid)) { + + /* + * In this implementation, in case of guest errors we ignore the + * command and move onto the next command in the queue. + */ + if (devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) { qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, - "%s: invalid command attributes " - "devid %d or eventid %d or invalid dte %d or" - "invalid cte %d or invalid ite %d\n", - __func__, devid, eventid, dte_valid, cte_valid, - ite_valid); - /* - * in this implementation, in case of error - * we ignore this command and move onto the next - * command in the queue - */ + "%s: invalid command attributes: devid %d>%d", + __func__, devid, s->dt.maxids.max_devids); + + } else if (!dte_valid || !ite_valid || !cte_valid) { + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, + "%s: invalid command attributes: " + "dte: %s, ite: %s, cte: %s\n", + __func__, + dte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid", + ite_valid ? "valid" : "invalid", + cte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid"); + } else if (eventid > max_eventid) { + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, + "%s: invalid command attributes: eventid %d > %d\n", + __func__, eventid, max_eventid); } else { /* * Current implementation only supports rdbase == procnum |