Merge tag 'mem-2023-10-12' of https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/qemu into staging

Hi,

"Host Memory Backends" and "Memory devices" queue ("mem"):
- Support memory devices with multiple memslots
- Support memory devices that dynamically consume memslots
- Support memory devices that can automatically decide on the number of
  memslots to use
- virtio-mem support for exposing memory dynamically via multiple
  memslots
- Some required cleanups/refactorings

# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
# iQJFBAABCAAvFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAmUn+XMRHGRhdmlkQHJl
# ZGhhdC5jb20ACgkQTd4Q9wD/g1qDHA//T01suTa+uzrcoJHoMWN11S47WnAmbuTo
# vVakucLBPMJAa9xZeCy3OavXaVGpHkw+t6g3OFknof0LfQ5/j9iE3Q1PxURN7g5j
# SJ2WJXCoceM6T4TMhPvVvgEaYjFmESqZB5FZgedMT0QRyhAxMuF9pCkWhk1O3OAV
# JqQKqLFiGcv60AEuBYGZGzgiOUv8EJ5gKwRF4VOdyHIxqZDw1aZXzlcd4TzFZBQ7
# rwW/3ef+sFmUJdmfrSrqcIlQSRrqZ2w95xATDzLTIEEUT3SWqh/E95EZWIz1M0oQ
# NgWgFiLCR1KOj7bWFhLXT7IfyLh0mEysD+P/hY6QwQ4RewWG7EW5UK+JFswssdcZ
# rEj5XpHZzev/wx7hM4bWsoQ+VIvrH7j3uYGyWkcgYRbdDEkWDv2rsT23lwGYNhht
# oBsrdEBELRw6v4C8doq/+sCmHmuxUMqTGwbArCQVnB1XnLxOEkuqlnfq5MORkzNF
# fxbIRx+LRluOllC0HVaDQd8qxRq1+UC5WIpAcDcrouy4HGgi1onWKrXpgjIAbVyH
# M6cENkK7rnRk96gpeXdmrf0h9HqRciAOY8oUsFsvLyKBOCPBWDrLyOQEY5UoSdtD
# m4QpEVgywCy2z1uU/UObeT/UxJy/9EL/Zb+DHoEK06iEhwONoUJjEBYMJD38RMkk
# mwPTB4UAk9g=
# =s69t
# -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# gpg: Signature made Thu 12 Oct 2023 09:49:39 EDT
# gpg:                using RSA key 1BD9CAAD735C4C3A460DFCCA4DDE10F700FF835A
# gpg:                issuer "david@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>" [unknown]
# gpg:                 aka "David Hildenbrand <davidhildenbrand@gmail.com>" [full]
# gpg:                 aka "David Hildenbrand <hildenbr@in.tum.de>" [unknown]
# gpg: WARNING: The key's User ID is not certified with a trusted signature!
# gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: 1BD9 CAAD 735C 4C3A 460D  FCCA 4DDE 10F7 00FF 835A

* tag 'mem-2023-10-12' of https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/qemu:
  virtio-mem: Mark memslot alias memory regions unmergeable
  memory,vhost: Allow for marking memory device memory regions unmergeable
  virtio-mem: Expose device memory dynamically via multiple memslots if enabled
  virtio-mem: Update state to match bitmap as soon as it's been migrated
  virtio-mem: Pass non-const VirtIOMEM via virtio_mem_range_cb
  memory: Clarify mapping requirements for RamDiscardManager
  memory-device,vhost: Support automatic decision on the number of memslots
  vhost: Add vhost_get_max_memslots()
  kvm: Add stub for kvm_get_max_memslots()
  memory-device,vhost: Support memory devices that dynamically consume memslots
  memory-device: Track required and actually used memslots in DeviceMemoryState
  stubs: Rename qmp_memory_device.c to memory_device.c
  memory-device: Support memory devices with multiple memslots
  vhost: Return number of free memslots
  kvm: Return number of free memslots
  softmmu/physmem: Fixup qemu_ram_block_from_host() documentation
  vhost: Remove vhost_backend_can_merge() callback
  vhost: Rework memslot filtering and fix "used_memslot" tracking

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 188 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/hw/mem/memory-device.c b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
index 667d56b..ae38f48 100644
--- a/hw/mem/memory-device.c
+++ b/hw/mem/memory-device.c
@@ -52,19 +52,135 @@ static int memory_device_build_list(Object *obj, void *opaque)
     return 0;
 }
 
-static void memory_device_check_addable(MachineState *ms, MemoryRegion *mr,
-                                        Error **errp)
+static unsigned int memory_device_get_memslots(MemoryDeviceState *md)
 {
+    const MemoryDeviceClass *mdc = MEMORY_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(md);
+
+    if (mdc->get_memslots) {
+        return mdc->get_memslots(md);
+    }
+    return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Memslots that are reserved by memory devices (required but still reported
+ * as free from KVM / vhost).
+ */
+static unsigned int get_reserved_memslots(MachineState *ms)
+{
+    if (ms->device_memory->used_memslots >
+        ms->device_memory->required_memslots) {
+        /* This is unexpected, and we warned already in the memory notifier. */
+        return 0;
+    }
+    return ms->device_memory->required_memslots -
+           ms->device_memory->used_memslots;
+}
+
+unsigned int memory_devices_get_reserved_memslots(void)
+{
+    if (!current_machine->device_memory) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+    return get_reserved_memslots(current_machine);
+}
+
+bool memory_devices_memslot_auto_decision_active(void)
+{
+    if (!current_machine->device_memory) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    return current_machine->device_memory->memslot_auto_decision_active;
+}
+
+static unsigned int memory_device_memslot_decision_limit(MachineState *ms,
+                                                         MemoryRegion *mr)
+{
+    const unsigned int reserved = get_reserved_memslots(ms);
+    const uint64_t size = memory_region_size(mr);
+    unsigned int max = vhost_get_max_memslots();
+    unsigned int free = vhost_get_free_memslots();
+    uint64_t available_space;
+    unsigned int memslots;
+
+    if (kvm_enabled()) {
+        max = MIN(max, kvm_get_max_memslots());
+        free = MIN(free, kvm_get_free_memslots());
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * If we only have less overall memslots than what we consider reasonable,
+     * just keep it to a minimum.
+     */
+    if (max < MEMORY_DEVICES_SAFE_MAX_MEMSLOTS) {
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Consider our soft-limit across all memory devices. We don't really
+     * expect to exceed this limit in reasonable configurations.
+     */
+    if (MEMORY_DEVICES_SOFT_MEMSLOT_LIMIT <=
+        ms->device_memory->required_memslots) {
+        return 1;
+    }
+    memslots = MEMORY_DEVICES_SOFT_MEMSLOT_LIMIT -
+               ms->device_memory->required_memslots;
+
+    /*
+     * Consider the actually still free memslots. This is only relevant if
+     * other memslot consumers would consume *significantly* more memslots than
+     * what we prepared for (> 253). Unlikely, but let's just handle it
+     * cleanly.
+     */
+    memslots = MIN(memslots, free - reserved);
+    if (memslots < 1 || unlikely(free < reserved)) {
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+    /* We cannot have any other memory devices? So give all to this device. */
+    if (size == ms->maxram_size - ms->ram_size) {
+        return memslots;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Simple heuristic: equally distribute the memslots over the space
+     * still available for memory devices.
+     */
+    available_space = ms->maxram_size - ms->ram_size -
+                      ms->device_memory->used_region_size;
+    memslots = (double)memslots * size / available_space;
+    return memslots < 1 ? 1 : memslots;
+}
+
+static void memory_device_check_addable(MachineState *ms, MemoryDeviceState *md,
+                                        MemoryRegion *mr, Error **errp)
+{
+    const MemoryDeviceClass *mdc = MEMORY_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(md);
     const uint64_t used_region_size = ms->device_memory->used_region_size;
     const uint64_t size = memory_region_size(mr);
+    const unsigned int reserved_memslots = get_reserved_memslots(ms);
+    unsigned int required_memslots, memslot_limit;
+
+    /*
+     * Instruct the device to decide how many memslots to use, if applicable,
+     * before we query the number of required memslots the first time.
+     */
+    if (mdc->decide_memslots) {
+        memslot_limit = memory_device_memslot_decision_limit(ms, mr);
+        mdc->decide_memslots(md, memslot_limit);
+    }
+    required_memslots = memory_device_get_memslots(md);
 
-    /* we will need a new memory slot for kvm and vhost */
-    if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_has_free_slot(ms)) {
-        error_setg(errp, "hypervisor has no free memory slots left");
+    /* we will need memory slots for kvm and vhost */
+    if (kvm_enabled() &&
+        kvm_get_free_memslots() < required_memslots + reserved_memslots) {
+        error_setg(errp, "hypervisor has not enough free memory slots left");
         return;
     }
-    if (!vhost_has_free_slot()) {
-        error_setg(errp, "a used vhost backend has no free memory slots left");
+    if (vhost_get_free_memslots() < required_memslots + reserved_memslots) {
+        error_setg(errp, "a used vhost backend has not enough free memory slots left");
         return;
     }
 
@@ -233,7 +349,7 @@ void memory_device_pre_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms,
         goto out;
     }
 
-    memory_device_check_addable(ms, mr, &local_err);
+    memory_device_check_addable(ms, md, mr, &local_err);
     if (local_err) {
         goto out;
     }
@@ -264,6 +380,7 @@ out:
 void memory_device_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
 {
     const MemoryDeviceClass *mdc = MEMORY_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(md);
+    const unsigned int memslots = memory_device_get_memslots(md);
     const uint64_t addr = mdc->get_addr(md);
     MemoryRegion *mr;
 
@@ -275,6 +392,11 @@ void memory_device_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
     g_assert(ms->device_memory);
 
     ms->device_memory->used_region_size += memory_region_size(mr);
+    ms->device_memory->required_memslots += memslots;
+    if (mdc->decide_memslots && memslots > 1) {
+        ms->device_memory->memslot_auto_decision_active++;
+    }
+
     memory_region_add_subregion(&ms->device_memory->mr,
                                 addr - ms->device_memory->base, mr);
     trace_memory_device_plug(DEVICE(md)->id ? DEVICE(md)->id : "", addr);
@@ -283,6 +405,7 @@ void memory_device_plug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
 void memory_device_unplug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
 {
     const MemoryDeviceClass *mdc = MEMORY_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(md);
+    const unsigned int memslots = memory_device_get_memslots(md);
     MemoryRegion *mr;
 
     /*
@@ -293,7 +416,12 @@ void memory_device_unplug(MemoryDeviceState *md, MachineState *ms)
     g_assert(ms->device_memory);
 
     memory_region_del_subregion(&ms->device_memory->mr, mr);
+
+    if (mdc->decide_memslots && memslots > 1) {
+        ms->device_memory->memslot_auto_decision_active--;
+    }
     ms->device_memory->used_region_size -= memory_region_size(mr);
+    ms->device_memory->required_memslots -= memslots;
     trace_memory_device_unplug(DEVICE(md)->id ? DEVICE(md)->id : "",
                                mdc->get_addr(md));
 }
@@ -313,6 +441,50 @@ uint64_t memory_device_get_region_size(const MemoryDeviceState *md,
     return memory_region_size(mr);
 }
 
+static void memory_devices_region_mod(MemoryListener *listener,
+                                      MemoryRegionSection *mrs, bool add)
+{
+    DeviceMemoryState *dms = container_of(listener, DeviceMemoryState,
+                                          listener);
+
+    if (!memory_region_is_ram(mrs->mr)) {
+        warn_report("Unexpected memory region mapped into device memory region.");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * The expectation is that each distinct RAM memory region section in
+     * our region for memory devices consumes exactly one memslot in KVM
+     * and in vhost. For vhost, this is true, except:
+     * * ROM memory regions don't consume a memslot. These get used very
+     *   rarely for memory devices (R/O NVDIMMs).
+     * * Memslots without a fd (memory-backend-ram) don't necessarily
+     *   consume a memslot. Such setups are quite rare and possibly bogus:
+     *   the memory would be inaccessible by such vhost devices.
+     *
+     * So for vhost, in corner cases we might over-estimate the number of
+     * memslots that are currently used or that might still be reserved
+     * (required - used).
+     */
+    dms->used_memslots += add ? 1 : -1;
+
+    if (dms->used_memslots > dms->required_memslots) {
+        warn_report("Memory devices use more memory slots than indicated as required.");
+    }
+}
+
+static void memory_devices_region_add(MemoryListener *listener,
+                                      MemoryRegionSection *mrs)
+{
+    return memory_devices_region_mod(listener, mrs, true);
+}
+
+static void memory_devices_region_del(MemoryListener *listener,
+                                      MemoryRegionSection *mrs)
+{
+    return memory_devices_region_mod(listener, mrs, false);
+}
+
 void machine_memory_devices_init(MachineState *ms, hwaddr base, uint64_t size)
 {
     g_assert(size);
@@ -322,8 +494,16 @@ void machine_memory_devices_init(MachineState *ms, hwaddr base, uint64_t size)
 
     memory_region_init(&ms->device_memory->mr, OBJECT(ms), "device-memory",
                        size);
+    address_space_init(&ms->device_memory->as, &ms->device_memory->mr,
+                       "device-memory");
     memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), ms->device_memory->base,
                                 &ms->device_memory->mr);
+
+    /* Track the number of memslots used by memory devices. */
+    ms->device_memory->listener.region_add = memory_devices_region_add;
+    ms->device_memory->listener.region_del = memory_devices_region_del;
+    memory_listener_register(&ms->device_memory->listener,
+                             &ms->device_memory->as);
 }
 
 static const TypeInfo memory_device_info = {