aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/disas
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>2020-11-09 09:35:48 -0500
committerDr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>2020-12-18 10:08:24 +0000
commite49393a349925567cb83cfe810bc595e42a17883 (patch)
treef71b6aec0a26073e1210f34bcb29061fa988aa47 /disas
parentff688cd2c7c3a677b71e4ea194a2fa49d07996c8 (diff)
downloadqemu-e49393a349925567cb83cfe810bc595e42a17883.zip
qemu-e49393a349925567cb83cfe810bc595e42a17883.tar.gz
qemu-e49393a349925567cb83cfe810bc595e42a17883.tar.bz2
virtiofsd: Use --thread-pool-size=0 to mean no thread pool
Right now we create a thread pool and main thread hands over the request to thread in thread pool to process. Number of threads in thread pool can be managed by option --thread-pool-size. In tests we have noted that many of the workloads are getting better performance if we don't use a thread pool at all and process all the requests in the context of a thread receiving the request. Hence give user an option to be able to run virtiofsd without using a thread pool. To implement this, I have used existing option --thread-pool-size. This option defines how many maximum threads can be in the thread pool. Thread pool size zero freezes thead pool. I can't see why will one start virtiofsd with a frozen thread pool (hence frozen file system). So I am redefining --thread-pool-size=0 to mean, don't use a thread pool. Instead process the request in the context of thread receiving request from the queue. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20201109143548.GA1479853@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'disas')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions