block/block-copy: fix progress calculation

Assume we have two regions, A and B, and region B is in-flight now,
region A is not yet touched, but it is unallocated and should be
skipped.

Correspondingly, as progress we have

  total = A + B
  current = 0

If we reset unallocated region A and call progress_reset_callback,
it will calculate 0 bytes dirty in the bitmap and call
job_progress_set_remaining, which will set

   total = current + 0 = 0 + 0 = 0

So, B bytes are actually removed from total accounting. When job
finishes we'll have

   total = 0
   current = B

, which doesn't sound good.

This is because we didn't considered in-flight bytes, actually when
calculating remaining, we should have set (in_flight + dirty_bytes)
as remaining, not only dirty_bytes.

To fix it, let's refactor progress calculation, moving it to block-copy
itself instead of fixing callback. And, of course, track in_flight
bytes count.

We still have to keep one callback, to maintain backup job bytes_read
calculation, but it will go on soon, when we turn the whole backup
process into one block_copy call.

Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200311103004.7649-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
index 79798a1..e2d7b3b 100644
--- a/block/block-copy.c
+++ b/block/block-copy.c
@@ -127,17 +127,20 @@ BlockCopyState *block_copy_state_new(BdrvChild *source, BdrvChild *target,
     return s;
 }
 
-void block_copy_set_callbacks(
+void block_copy_set_progress_callback(
         BlockCopyState *s,
         ProgressBytesCallbackFunc progress_bytes_callback,
-        ProgressResetCallbackFunc progress_reset_callback,
         void *progress_opaque)
 {
     s->progress_bytes_callback = progress_bytes_callback;
-    s->progress_reset_callback = progress_reset_callback;
     s->progress_opaque = progress_opaque;
 }
 
+void block_copy_set_progress_meter(BlockCopyState *s, ProgressMeter *pm)
+{
+    s->progress = pm;
+}
+
 /*
  * block_copy_do_copy
  *
@@ -269,7 +272,9 @@ int64_t block_copy_reset_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s,
 
     if (!ret) {
         bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, offset, bytes);
-        s->progress_reset_callback(s->progress_opaque);
+        progress_set_remaining(s->progress,
+                               bdrv_get_dirty_count(s->copy_bitmap) +
+                               s->in_flight_bytes);
     }
 
     *count = bytes;
@@ -331,15 +336,18 @@ int coroutine_fn block_copy(BlockCopyState *s,
         trace_block_copy_process(s, start);
 
         bdrv_reset_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, chunk_end - start);
+        s->in_flight_bytes += chunk_end - start;
 
         co_get_from_shres(s->mem, chunk_end - start);
         ret = block_copy_do_copy(s, start, chunk_end, error_is_read);
         co_put_to_shres(s->mem, chunk_end - start);
+        s->in_flight_bytes -= chunk_end - start;
         if (ret < 0) {
             bdrv_set_dirty_bitmap(s->copy_bitmap, start, chunk_end - start);
             break;
         }
 
+        progress_work_done(s->progress, chunk_end - start);
         s->progress_bytes_callback(chunk_end - start, s->progress_opaque);
         start = chunk_end;
         ret = 0;