diff options
| author | Doug Brown <doug@schmorgal.com> | 2024-09-13 15:31:49 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2024-09-13 15:31:49 +0100 |
| commit | d4b668b799c5ce7ab7cc500707edff8af01ecf68 (patch) | |
| tree | b323b43520abc86b8c204ebd8834c2ef313c7ef6 | |
| parent | 12d60ca09e5150b785d067566f49e330c68b2985 (diff) | |
| download | qemu-d4b668b799c5ce7ab7cc500707edff8af01ecf68.zip qemu-d4b668b799c5ce7ab7cc500707edff8af01ecf68.tar.gz qemu-d4b668b799c5ce7ab7cc500707edff8af01ecf68.tar.bz2 | |
hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd: Fix FIFO issues
The read index should not be changed when storing a new message into the
RX or TX FIFO. Changing it at this point will cause the reader to get
out of sync. The wrapping of the read index is already handled by the
pre-write functions for the FIFO status registers anyway.
Additionally, the calculation for wrapping the store index was off by
one, which caused new messages to be written to the wrong location in
the FIFO. This caused incorrect messages to be delivered.
Signed-off-by: Doug Brown <doug@schmorgal.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20240827034927.66659-8-doug@schmorgal.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c b/hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c index ccfed36..e148bd7 100644 --- a/hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c +++ b/hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c @@ -1144,18 +1144,8 @@ static void update_rx_sequential(XlnxVersalCANFDState *s, read_index = ARRAY_FIELD_EX32(s->regs, RX_FIFO_STATUS_REGISTER, RI); store_index = read_index + fill_level; - if (read_index == s->cfg.rx0_fifo - 1) { - /* - * When ri is s->cfg.rx0_fifo - 1 i.e. max, it goes cyclic that - * means we reset the ri to 0x0. - */ - read_index = 0; - ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(s->regs, RX_FIFO_STATUS_REGISTER, RI, - read_index); - } - if (store_index > s->cfg.rx0_fifo - 1) { - store_index -= s->cfg.rx0_fifo - 1; + store_index -= s->cfg.rx0_fifo; } store_location = R_RB_ID_REGISTER + @@ -1172,18 +1162,8 @@ static void update_rx_sequential(XlnxVersalCANFDState *s, RI_1); store_index = read_index + fill_level; - if (read_index == s->cfg.rx1_fifo - 1) { - /* - * When ri is s->cfg.rx1_fifo - 1 i.e. max, it goes cyclic that - * means we reset the ri to 0x0. - */ - read_index = 0; - ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(s->regs, RX_FIFO_STATUS_REGISTER, RI_1, - read_index); - } - if (store_index > s->cfg.rx1_fifo - 1) { - store_index -= s->cfg.rx1_fifo - 1; + store_index -= s->cfg.rx1_fifo; } store_location = R_RB_ID_REGISTER_1 + @@ -1265,18 +1245,8 @@ static void tx_fifo_stamp(XlnxVersalCANFDState *s, uint32_t tb0_regid) " Discarding the message\n"); ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(s->regs, INTERRUPT_STATUS_REGISTER, TXEOFLW, 1); } else { - if (read_index == s->cfg.tx_fifo - 1) { - /* - * When ri is s->cfg.tx_fifo - 1 i.e. max, it goes cyclic that - * means we reset the ri to 0x0. - */ - read_index = 0; - ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(s->regs, TX_EVENT_FIFO_STATUS_REGISTER, TXE_RI, - read_index); - } - if (store_index > s->cfg.tx_fifo - 1) { - store_index -= s->cfg.tx_fifo - 1; + store_index -= s->cfg.tx_fifo; } assert(store_index < s->cfg.tx_fifo); |