1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 6
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-ALL
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -da-enable-dependence-test=weak-zero-siv 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV
; for (i = 0; i < (1LL << 62); i++) {
; if (0 <= 2*i - 2)
; A[2*i - 2] = 1;
; A[2] = 2;
; }
;
; FIXME: DependenceAnalysis currently detects no dependency between the two
; stores, but it does exist. The root cause is that the product of the BTC and
; the coefficient ((1LL << 62) - 1 and 2) overflows in a signed sense.
;
define void @weakzero_dst_siv_prod_ovfl(ptr %A) {
; CHECK-ALL-LABEL: 'weakzero_dst_siv_prod_ovfl'
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [S]!
;
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-LABEL: 'weakzero_dst_siv_prod_ovfl'
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [*]!
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [S]!
;
entry:
br label %loop.header
loop.header:
%i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.latch ]
%offset = phi i64 [ -2, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop.latch ]
%ec = icmp eq i64 %i, 4611686018427387904
br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop.body
loop.body:
%cond = icmp sge i64 %offset, 0
br i1 %cond, label %if.then, label %loop.latch
if.then:
%gep.0 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %A, i64 %offset
store i8 1, ptr %gep.0
br label %loop.latch
loop.latch:
%gep.1 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %A, i64 2
store i8 2, ptr %gep.1
%i.inc = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 1
%offset.next = add nsw i64 %offset, 2
br label %loop.header
exit:
ret void
}
; for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
; if (0 <= 2*i - 1)
; A[2*i - 1] = 1;
; A[INT64_MAX] = 2;
; }
;
; FIXME: DependenceAnalysis currently detects no dependency between the two
; stores, but it does exist. When `%n` is 2^62, the value of `%offset` will be
; the same as INT64_MAX at the last iteration.
; The root cause is that the calculation of the difference between the two
; constants (INT64_MAX and -1) overflows in a signed sense.
;
define void @weakzero_dst_siv_delta_ovfl(ptr %A, i64 %n) {
; CHECK-ALL-LABEL: 'weakzero_dst_siv_delta_ovfl'
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: Src: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-ALL-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [S]!
;
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-LABEL: 'weakzero_dst_siv_delta_ovfl'
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [*]!
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 1, ptr %gep.0, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - none!
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: Src: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 2, ptr %gep.1, align 1
; CHECK-WEAK-ZERO-SIV-NEXT: da analyze - consistent output [S]!
;
entry:
%guard = icmp sgt i64 %n, 0
br i1 %guard, label %loop.header, label %exit
loop.header:
%i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.latch ]
%offset = phi i64 [ -2, %entry ], [ %offset.next, %loop.latch ]
%ec = icmp eq i64 %i, %n
br i1 %ec, label %exit, label %loop.body
loop.body:
%cond = icmp sge i64 %offset, 0
br i1 %cond, label %if.then, label %loop.latch
if.then:
%gep.0 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %A, i64 %offset
store i8 1, ptr %gep.0
br label %loop.latch
loop.latch:
%gep.1 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %A, i64 9223372036854775807
store i8 2, ptr %gep.1
%i.inc = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 1
%offset.next = add nsw i64 %offset, 2
br label %loop.header
exit:
ret void
}
;; NOTE: These prefixes are unused and the list is autogenerated. Do not add tests below this line:
; CHECK: {{.*}}
|
