| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
InstructionCost is already an optional value, containing an Invalid
state that can be checked with isValid(). There is little point in
returning another optional from getValue(). Most uses do not make use of
it being a std::optional, dereferencing the value directly (either
isValid has been checked previously or the Cost is assumed to be valid).
The one case that does in AMDGPU used value_or which has been replaced
by a isValid() check.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#123737)
As part of the "RemoveDIs" project, BasicBlock::iterator now carries a
debug-info bit that's needed when getFirstNonPHI and similar feed into
instruction insertion positions. Call-sites where that's necessary were
updated a year ago; but to ensure some type safety however, we'd like to
have all calls to getFirstNonPHI use the iterator-returning version.
This patch changes a bunch of call-sites calling getFirstNonPHI to use
getFirstNonPHIIt, which returns an iterator. All these call sites are
where it's obviously safe to fetch the iterator then dereference it. A
follow-up patch will contain less-obviously-safe changes.
We'll eventually deprecate and remove the instruction-pointer
getFirstNonPHI, but not before adding concise documentation of what
considerations are needed (very few).
---------
Co-authored-by: Stephen Tozer <Melamoto@gmail.com>
|
|
As part of the "RemoveDIs" project, BasicBlock::iterator now carries a
debug-info bit that's needed when getFirstNonPHI and similar feed into
instruction insertion positions. Call-sites where that's necessary were
updated a year ago; but to ensure some type safety however, we'd like to
have all calls to moveBefore use iterators.
This patch adds a (guaranteed dereferenceable) iterator-taking
moveBefore, and changes a bunch of call-sites where it's obviously safe
to change to use it by just calling getIterator() on an instruction
pointer. A follow-up patch will contain less-obviously-safe changes.
We'll eventually deprecate and remove the instruction-pointer
insertBefore, but not before adding concise documentation of what
considerations are needed (very few).
|
|
branches (#119728)
Loop latches often have a loop-carried dependency, and if they have
several SelectLike instructions in one select group, it is usually
profitable to convert it to branches rather than keep selects.
|
|
Building on top of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115489
extend support for binops with SExt operand.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115879
|
|
For conditional increments with sign check conditions like X < 0 or X >= 0,
the compiler may generate code like this:
%cmp = icmp sgt i64 %1, -1
%shift = ashr i64 %1, 63
%j.next = add nsw i64 %j, %shift
%sel = select i1 %cmp ...
, where %cmp is not in computation but in some other implicit or regular
expressions. This patch allows SelectOptimize pass to recognise these
cases.
|
|
first (#119362)
|
|
Extend the support for implicit selects in the form of OR with a ZExt
operand to support ADD and SUB binops as well. They similarly can form
implicit selects which can be profitable to convert back the branches.
PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115489
|
|
(#117582)
* Enables conversion of several select-like instructions within one
group
* Any number of auxiliary instructions depending on the same condition
can be in between select-like instructions
* After splitting the basic block, move select-like instructions into
the relevant basic blocks and optimise them
* Make it easier to add support shift-base select-like instructions and
also any mixture of zext/sext/not instructions
|
|
operations (#115745)"
This reverts commit b5a11d378db4b39ceb085ebd59c941e9369d9596.
|
|
(#115745)
* Enables conversion of several select-like instructions within one
group
* Any number of auxiliary instructions depending on the same condition
can be in between select-like instructions
* After splitting the basic block, move select-like instructions into
the relevant basic blocks and optimise them
* Make it easier to add support shift-base select-like instructions and
also any mixture of zext/sext/not instructions
|
|
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This patch attempts to help the SelectOpt pass detect select groups made
up of conditions and not(conditions). Usually these are canonicalized in
instcombine to remove the not and invert the true/false values, but this
will not happen for Loginal operations, which can be beneficial to
convert if they are part of a larger select group. The handling for
not's are mostly handled in the SelectLike, which can be marked as
Inverted in order to reverse the TrueValue and FalseValue.
This helps fix a regression in fortran minloc constructs, after #84628
helped simplify a loop with branches into a loop with selects.
|
|
This is the major rename patch that prior patches have built towards.
The DPValue class is being renamed to DbgVariableRecord, which reflects
the updated terminology for the "final" implementation of the RemoveDI
feature. This is a pure string substitution + clang-format patch. The
only manual component of this patch was determining where to perform
these string substitutions: `DPValue` and `DPV` are almost exclusively
used for DbgRecords, *except* for:
- llvm/lib/target, where 'DP' is used to mean double-precision, and so
appears as part of .td files and in variable names. NB: There is a
single existing use of `DPValue` here that refers to debug info, which
I've manually updated.
- llvm/tools/gold, where 'LDPV' is used as a prefix for symbol
visibility enums.
Outside of these places, I've applied several basic string
substitutions, with the intent that they only affect DbgRecord-related
identifiers; I've checked them as I went through to verify this, with
reasonable confidence that there are no unintended changes that slipped
through the cracks. The substitutions applied are all case-sensitive,
and are applied in the order shown:
```
DPValue -> DbgVariableRecord
DPVal -> DbgVarRec
DPV -> DVR
```
Following the previous rename patches, it should be the case that there
are no instances of any of these strings that are meant to refer to the
general case of DbgRecords, or anything other than the DPValue class.
The idea behind this patch is therefore that pure string substitution is
correct in all cases as long as these assumptions hold.
|
|
This patch continues the ongoing rename work, replacing DPValue with
DbgRecord in comments and the names of variables, both members and
fn-local. This is the most labour-intensive part of the rename, as it is
where the most decisions have to be made about whether a given comment
or variable is referring to DPValues (equivalent to debug variable
intrinsics) or DbgRecords (a catch-all for all debug intrinsics); these
decisions are not individually difficult, but comprise a fairly large
amount of text to review.
This patch still largely performs basic string substitutions followed by
clang-format; there are almost* no places where, for example, a comment
has been expanded or modified to reflect the semantic difference between
DPValues and DbgRecords. I don't believe such a change is generally
necessary in LLVM, but it may be useful in the docs, and so I'll be
submitting docs changes as a separate patch.
*In a few places, `dbg.values` was replaced with `debug intrinsics`.
|
|
(#84793)
As part of the effort to rename the DbgRecord classes, this patch
renames the widely-used functions that operate on DbgRecords but refer
to DbgValues or DPValues in their names to refer to DbgRecords instead;
all such functions are defined in one of `BasicBlock.h`,
`Instruction.h`, and `DebugProgramInstruction.h`.
This patch explicitly does not change the names of any comments or
variables, except for where they use the exact name of one of the
renamed functions. The reason for this is reviewability; this patch can
be trivially examined to determine that the only changes are direct
string substitutions and any results from clang-format responding to the
changed line lengths. Future patches will cover renaming variables and
comments, and then renaming the classes themselves.
|
|
Fix crash mentioned in comments on
d759618df76361a8e490eeae5c5399e0738cbfd0.
The assertion being hit was complaining that we had dangling DPValues;
the DPValues attached to the terminator of StartBlock become dangling
after the terminator is erased, and they're never "flushed" back onto
the new terminator once it's added. Doing that makes the crash go away,
but doesn't replicate existing dbg.* behaviour. See the comment in the
patch.
This change both fixes the crash (because there are now no DPValues left
on the terminator to dangle) and replicates existing behaviour (moves
those DPValues down to the new block).
|
|
Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80125
|
|
Some operations behave like selects. For example `or(zext(c), y)` is the
same as select(c, y|1, y)` and instcombine can canonicalize the select
to the or form. These operations can still be worthwhile converting to
branch as opposed to keeping as a select or or instruction.
This patch attempts to add some basic handling for them, creating a
SelectLike abstraction in the select optimization pass. The backend can
opt into handling `or(zext(c),x)` as a select if it could be profitable,
and the select optimization pass attempts to handle them in much the
same way as a `select(c, x|1, x)`. The Or(x, 1) may need to be added as
a new instruction, generated as the or is converted to branches.
This helps fix a regression from selects being converted to or's
recently.
|
|
When there are debug intrinsics in-between groups of select
instructions, select-optimise sinks them into the "end" block. This
needs to be replicated for DPValues, the non-instruction variable
assignment object. Implement that and add a RUN line to a test that was
sensitive to this to ensure it gets tested.
(The exact range of instructions being transformed here is a little
fiddly, hence I've gone with a helper lambda).
|
|
- Use `BlockFrequencyInfoWrapperPass` in legacy pass so member
`std::unique_ptr<BranchProbabilityInfo> BPI` could be removed.
- Member `DominatorTree *DT = nullptr` is unused, remove it.
|
|
Identified with clangd.
|
|
The `BlockFrequency` class abstracts `uint64_t` frequency values. Use it
more consistently in various APIs and disable implicit conversion to
make usage more consistent and explicit.
- Use `BlockFrequency Freq` parameter for `setBlockFreq`,
`getProfileCountFromFreq` and `setBlockFreqAndScale` functions.
- Return `BlockFrequency` in `getEntryFreq()` functions.
- While on it change some `const BlockFrequency& Freq` parameters to
plain `BlockFreqency Freq`.
- Mark `BlockFrequency(uint64_t)` constructor as explicit.
- Add missing `BlockFrequency::operator!=`.
- Remove `uint64_t BlockFreqency::getMaxFrequency()`.
- Add `BlockFrequency BlockFrequency::max()` function.
|
|
Continuing the patch series to get rid of debug intrinsics [0], instruction
insertion needs to be done with iterators rather than instruction pointers,
so that we can communicate information in the iterator class. This patch
adds an iterator-taking insertBefore method and converts various call sites
to take iterators. These are all sites where such debug-info needs to be
preserved so that a stage2 clang can be built identically; it's likely that
many more will need to be changed in the future.
At this stage, this is just changing the spelling of a few operations,
which will eventually become signifiant once the debug-info bearing
iterator is used.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152537
|
|
As outlined in my proposal of how to get rid of debug intrinsics, this
patch adds a moveBefore method that signals the caller /intends/ the order
of moved instructions is to stay the same. This semantic difference has an
effect on debug-info, as it signals whether debug-info needs to move with
instructions or not.
The patch just replaces a few calls to moveBefore with calls to
moveBeforePreserving -- and the latter just calls the former, so it's all
NFC right now. A future patch will add an implementation of
moveBeforePreserving that takes action to correctly preserve debug-info,
but that's tightly coupled with our non-instruction debug-info
representation that's still being reviewed.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156369
|
|
Remove the unnecessary `"llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"` include directive from
`ComplexDeinterleavingPass.h` and move it to the corresponding source
file.
Add missing includes that were transitively included by this header to 3
other source files.
This reduces the total number of preprocessing tokens across the LLVM
source files in `lib` from (roughly) 1,964,876,961 to 1,935,091,611 - a
reduction of ~1.52%. This should result in a small improvement in
compilation time.
|
|
This reverts commit 058ca5c07106d38ad66e3ec4972a613a64e88151.
|
|
Remove the unnecessary `"llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"` include directive from
`ComplexDeinterleavingPass.h` and move it to the corresponding source
file.
Add missing includes that were transitively included by this header to 2
other source files.
This reduces the total number of preprocessing tokens across the LLVM
source files in `lib` from (roughly) 1,964,876,961 to 1,935,091,611 - a
reduction of ~1.52%. This should result in a small improvement in
compilation time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150514
|
|
This change initializes the members TSI, LI, DT, PSI, and ORE pointer feilds of the SelectOptimize class to nullptr.
Reviewed By: LuoYuanke
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148303
|
|
value() has undesired exception checking semantics and calls
__throw_bad_optional_access in libc++. Moreover, the API is unavailable without
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS on older Mach-O platforms (see
_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS).
|
|
These files no longer use llvm::Optional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This enabled the select optimize patch for ARM Out of order AArch64
cores. It is trying to solve a problem that is difficult for the
compiler to fix. The criteria for when a csel is better or worse than a
branch depends heavily on whether the branch is well predicted and the
amount of ILP in the loop (as well as other criteria like the core in
question and the relative performance of the branch predictor). The
pass seems to do a decent job though, with the inner loop heuristics
being well implemented and doing a better job than I had expected in
general, even without PGO information.
I've been doing quite a bit of benchmarking. The headline numbers are
these for SPEC2017 on a Neoverse N1:
500.perlbench_r -0.12%
502.gcc_r 0.02%
505.mcf_r 6.02%
520.omnetpp_r 0.32%
523.xalancbmk_r 0.20%
525.x264_r 0.02%
531.deepsjeng_r 0.00%
541.leela_r -0.09%
548.exchange2_r 0.00%
557.xz_r -0.20%
Running benchmarks with a combination of the llvm-test-suite plus
several versions of SPEC gave between a 0.2% and 0.4% geomean
improvement depending on the core/run. The instruction count went down
by 0.1% too, which is a good sign, but the results can be a little
noisy. Some issues from other benchmarks I had ran were improved in
rGca78b5601466f8515f5f958ef8e63d787d9d812e. In summary well predicted
branches will see in improvement, badly predicted branches may get
worse, and on average performance seems to be a little better overall.
This patch enables the pass for AArch64 under -O3 for cores that will
benefit for it. i.e. not in-order cores that do not fit into the "Assume
infinite resources that allow to fully exploit the available
instruction-level parallelism" cost model. It uses a subtarget feature
for specifying when the pass will be enabled, which I have enabled under
cpu=generic as the performance increases for out of order cores seems
larger than any decreases for inorder, which were minor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138990
|
|
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
|
|
A `select i1 %c, i1 true, i1 %d` is just an or and a `select i1 %c, i1 %d, i1 false`
is just an and. There are better treated as such in the logic of SelectOpt, allowing
the backend to optimize them to and/or directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138490
|
|
This is some quick debug messages for the SelectOptimize pass, adding
some information for the costs that are measured from getInstructionCost
calls, and re-using the existing optimization remarks to print some
information about if transforms were performed or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138108
|
|
This patch replaces:
return Optional<T>();
with:
return None;
to make the migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional easier.
Specifically, I can deprecate None (in my source tree, that is) to
identify all the instances of None that should be replaced with
std::nullopt.
Note that "return None" far outnumbers "return Optional<T>();". There
are more than 2000 instances of "return None" in our source tree.
All of the instances in this patch come from functions that return
Optional<T> except Archive::findSym and ASTNodeImporter::import, where
we return Expected<Optional<T>>. Note that we can construct
Expected<Optional<T>> from any parameter convertible to Optional<T>,
which None certainly is.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138464
|
|
This is a follow-up to D133777, which resolved a use-after-free case but
did not cover all possible memory bugs due to misplacement of loads.
In short, the overall problem was that sinked loads could be moved after
state-modifying instructions leading to memory bugs.
The solution is to restrict load sinking unless it is found to be sound.
i) Within a basic block (to-be-sinked load and select-user are in the same BB),
loads can be sinked only if there is no intervening state-modifying instruction.
This is a conservative approach to avoid resorting to alias analysis to detect
potential memory overlap.
ii) Across basic blocks, sinking of loads is avoided. This is because going over
multiple basic blocks looking for memory conflicts could be computationally
expensive and also unlikely to allow loads to sink. Further, experiments showed
that not sinking these loads has a slight positive performance effect.
Maybe for some of these loads, having some separation allows enough time
for the load to be executed in time for its user. This is not the case for
floating point operations that benefit more from sinking.
The solution in D133777 was essentially undone in this patch,
since the latter is a complete solution to the observed problem.
Overall, the performance impact of this patch is minimal.
Tested on two internal Google workloads with instrPGO.
Search application showed <0.05% perf difference,
while the database one showed a slight improvement,
but not statistically significant.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133999
|
|
When a select is converted to a branch and load instructions are sinked to the true/false blocks,
lifetime intrinsics (if present) could be made unsound if not moved.
This conservatively moves all lifetime intrinsics in a transformed BB to the end block to ensure
preserved lifetime semantics.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133777
|
|
|
|
In this patch we replace common code patterns with the use of utility
functions for dealing with profiling metadata. There should be no change
in functionality, as the existing checks should be preserved in all
cases.
Reviewed By: bogner, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128860
|
|
This reverts commit 300c9a78819b4608b96bb26f9320bea6b8a0c4d0.
We will reland once these issues are ironed out.
|
|
In this patch we replace common code patterns with the use of utility
functions for dealing with profiling metadata. There should be no change
in functionality, as the existing checks should be preserved in all
cases.
Reviewed By: bogner, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128860
|
