| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
PEI tries to keep track of how much starting or ending a call sequence adjusts the stack pointer by, so that it can resolve frame-index references. Currently, it takes a very simplistic view of how SP adjustments are done - both FrameStartOpcode and FrameDestroyOpcode adjust it exactly by the amount written in its first argument.
This view is in fact incorrect for some targets (e.g. due to stack re-alignment, or because it may want to adjust the stack pointer in multiple steps). However, that doesn't cause breakage, because most targets (the only in-tree exception appears to be 32-bit ARM) rely on being able to simplify the call frame pseudo-instructions earlier, so this code is never hit.
Moving the computation into TargetInstrInfo allows targets to override the way the adjustment is computed if they need to have a non-zero SPAdj.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6863
llvm-svn: 225437
|
|
x86-64 Backend
This is the second patch in a small series. This patch contains the MachineInstruction and x86-64 backend pieces required to lower Statepoints. It does not include the code to actually generate the STATEPOINT machine instruction and as a result, the entire patch is currently dead code. I will be submitting the SelectionDAG parts within the next 24-48 hours. Since those pieces are by far the most complicated, I wanted to minimize the size of that patch. That patch will include the tests which exercise the functionality in this patch. The entire series can be seen as one combined whole in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5683.
The STATEPOINT psuedo node is generated after all gc values are explicitly spilled to stack slots. The purpose of this node is to wrap an actual call instruction while recording the spill locations of the meta arguments used for garbage collection and other purposes. The STATEPOINT is modeled as modifing all of those locations to prevent backend optimizations from forwarding the value from before the STATEPOINT to after the STATEPOINT. (Doing so would break relocation semantics for collectors which wish to relocate roots.)
The implementation of STATEPOINT is closely modeled on PATCHPOINT. Eventually, much of the code in this patch will be removed. The long term plan is to merge the functionality provided by statepoints and patchpoints. Merging their implementations in the backend is likely to be a good starting point.
Reviewed by: atrick, ributzka
llvm-svn: 223085
|
|
MachineFunction rather than TargetMachine.
llvm-svn: 219670
|
|
llvm-svn: 216351
|
|
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
|
|
to use register units instead of registers.
reviewed by Jakob Stoklund Olesen.
llvm-svn: 214798
|
|
information and update all callers. No functional change.
llvm-svn: 214781
|
|
ignore SEH pseudo ops in X86 JIT emitter.
--
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
llvm-svn: 211691
|
|
It broke Legacy JIT Tests on x86_64-{mingw32|msvc}, aka Windows x64.
llvm-svn: 211480
|
|
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
llvm-svn: 211399
|
|
llvm-svn: 210401
|
|
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
|
|
instead of comparing to nullptr.
llvm-svn: 206142
|
|
This removes the -segmented-stacks command line flag in favor of a
per-function "split-stack" attribute.
Patch by Luqman Aden and Alex Crichton!
llvm-svn: 205997
|
|
llvm-svn: 205610
|
|
Remove the old functions.
llvm-svn: 202636
|
|
stackmaps and patchpoints into target-specific code.
The lowering of the frame index for stackmaps and patchpoints requires some
target-specific magic and should therefore be handled in the target-specific
eliminateFrameIndex method.
This is related to <rdar://problem/16106219>
llvm-svn: 201904
|
|
This changes the PrologueEpilogInserter and LocalStackSlotAllocation passes to
follow the extended stack layout rules for sspstrong and sspreq.
The sspstrong layout rules are:
1. Large arrays and structures containing large arrays (>= ssp-buffer-size)
are closest to the stack protector.
2. Small arrays and structures containing small arrays (< ssp-buffer-size) are
2nd closest to the protector.
3. Variables that have had their address taken are 3rd closest to the
protector.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2546
llvm-svn: 200601
|
|
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
|
|
in PEI a nd LocalStackSlot passes.
This changes the MachineFrameInfo API to use the new SSPLayoutKind information
produced by the StackProtector pass (instead of a boolean flag) and updates a
few pass dependencies (to preserve the SSP analysis).
The stack layout follows the same approach used prior to this change - i.e.,
only LargeArray stack objects will be placed near the canary and everything
else will be laid out normally. After this change, structures containing large
arrays will also be placed near the canary - a case previously missed by the
old implementation.
Out of tree targets will need to update their usage of
MachineFrameInfo::CreateStackObject to remove the MayNeedSP argument.
The next patch will implement the rules for sspstrong and sspreq. The end goal
is to support ssp-strong stack layout rules.
WIP.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2158
llvm-svn: 197653
|
|
This reapplies r197438 and fixes the link-time circular dependency between
IR and Support. The fix consists in moving the diagnostic support into IR.
The patch adds a new LLVMContext::diagnose that can be used to communicate to
the front-end, if any, that something of interest happened.
The diagnostics are supported by a new abstraction, the DiagnosticInfo class.
The base class contains the following information:
- The kind of the report: What this is about.
- The severity of the report: How bad this is.
This patch also adds 2 classes:
- DiagnosticInfoInlineAsm: For inline asm reporting. Basically, this diagnostic
will be used to switch to the new diagnostic API for LLVMContext::emitError.
- DiagnosticStackSize: For stack size reporting. Comes as a replacement of the
hard coded warning in PEI.
This patch also features dynamic diagnostic identifiers. In other words plugins
can use this infrastructure for their own diagnostics (for more details, see
getNextAvailablePluginDiagnosticKind).
This patch introduces a new DiagnosticHandlerTy and a new DiagnosticContext in
the LLVMContext that should be set by the front-end to be able to map these
diagnostics in its own system.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2376
<rdar://problem/15515174>
llvm-svn: 197508
|
|
dependency at link time
llvm-svn: 197451
|
|
The patch adds a new LLVMContext::diagnose that can be used to communicate to
the front-end, if any, that something of interest happened.
The diagnostics are supported by a new abstraction, the DiagnosticInfo class.
The base class contains the following information:
- The kind of the report: What this is about.
- The severity of the report: How bad this is.
This patch also adds 2 classes:
- DiagnosticInfoInlineAsm: For inline asm reporting. Basically, this diagnostic
will be used to switch to the new diagnostic API for LLVMContext::emitError.
- DiagnosticStackSize: For stack size reporting. Comes as a replacement of the
hard coded warning in PEI.
This patch also features dynamic diagnostic identifiers. In other words plugins
can use this infrastructure for their own diagnostics (for more details, see
getNextAvailablePluginDiagnosticKind).
This patch introduces a new DiagnosticHandlerTy and a new DiagnosticContext in
the LLVMContext that should be set by the front-end to be able to map these
diagnostics in its own system.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2376
<rdar://problem/15515174>
llvm-svn: 197438
|
|
target independent.
Most of the x86 specific stackmap/patchpoint handling was necessitated by the
use of the native address-mode format for frame index operands. PEI has now
been modified to treat stackmap/patchpoint similarly to DEBUG_INFO, allowing
us to use a simple, platform independent register/offset pair for frame
indexes on stackmap/patchpoints.
Notes:
- Folding is now platform independent and automatically supported.
- Emiting patchpoints with direct memory references now just involves calling
the TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint utility method from the target's
XXXTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter method. (See
X86TargetLowering for an example).
- No more ugly platform-specific operand parsers.
This patch shouldn't change the generated output for X86.
llvm-svn: 195944
|
|
It had no tests, was unused and was "experimental at best".
llvm-svn: 193749
|
|
llvm-svn: 190499
|
|
We can have a FrameSetup in one basic block and the matching FrameDestroy
in a different basic block when we have struct byval. In that case, SPAdj
is not zero at beginning of the basic block.
Modify PEI to correctly set SPAdj at beginning of each basic block using
DFS traversal. We used to assume SPAdj is 0 at beginning of each basic block.
PEI had an assert SPAdjCount || SPAdj == 0.
If we have a Destroy <n> followed by a Setup <m>, PEI will assert failure.
We can add an extra condition to make sure the pairs are matched:
The pairs start with a FrameSetup.
But since we are doing a much better job in the verifier, this patch removes
the check in PEI.
PR16393
llvm-svn: 186364
|
|
replaceFrameIndices(MF) will iterate over the BBs and call
replaceFrameIndices(BB). No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 186141
|
|
SystemZ wants normal register scavenging slots, as close to the stack or
frame pointer as possible. The only reason it was using custom code was
because PrologEpilogInserter assumed an x86-like layout, where the frame
pointer is at the opposite end of the frame from the stack pointer.
This meant that when frame pointer elimination was disabled,
the slots ended up being as close as possible to the incoming
stack pointer, which is the opposite of what we want on SystemZ.
This patch adds a new knob to say which layout is used and converts
SystemZ to use target-independent scavenging slots. It's one of the pieces
needed to support frame-to-frame MVCs, where two slots might be required.
The ABI requires us to allocate 160 bytes for calls, so one approach
would be to use that area as temporary spill space instead. It would need
some surgery to make sure that the slot isn't live across a call though.
I stuck to the "isFPCloseToIncomingSP - ..." style comment on the
"do what the surrounding code does" principle. The FP case is already
covered by several Systemz/frame-* tests, which fail without the
PrologueEpilogueInserter change, so no new ones are needed.
No behavioural change intended.
llvm-svn: 185696
|
|
avoid specifying the vector size unnecessarily.
llvm-svn: 185512
|
|
Rather than using the full power of target-specific addressing modes in
DBG_VALUEs with Frame Indicies, simply use Frame Index + Offset. This
reduces the complexity of debug info handling down to two
representations of values (reg+offset and frame index+offset) rather
than three or four.
Ideally we could ensure that frame indicies had been eliminated by the
time we reached an assembly or dwarf generation, but I haven't spent the
time to figure out where the FIs are leaking through into that & whether
there's a good place to convert them. Some FI+offset=>reg+offset
conversion is done (see PrologEpilogInserter, for example) which is
necessary for some SelectionDAG assumptions about registers, I believe,
but it might be possible to make this a more thorough conversion &
ensure there are no remaining FIs no matter how instruction selection
is performed.
llvm-svn: 184066
|
|
in functions which call __builtin_unwind_init()
__builtin_unwind_init() is an undocumented gcc intrinsic which has this effect,
and is used in libgcc_eh.
Goes part of the way toward fixing PR8541.
llvm-svn: 183984
|
|
instantiation issue with non-standard type.
Add a backend option to warn on a given stack size limit.
Option: -mllvm -warn-stack-size=<limit>
Output (if limit is exceeded):
warning: Stack size limit exceeded (<actual size>) in <functionName>.
The longer term plan is to hook that to a clang warning.
PR:4072
<rdar://problem/13987214>.
llvm-svn: 183595
|
|
llvm-svn: 183579
|
|
Option: -mllvm -warn-stack-size=<limit>
Output (if limit is exceeded):
warning: Stack size limit exceeded (<actual size>) in <functionName>.
The longer term plan is to hook that to a clang warning.
PR:4072
<rdar://problem/13987214>
llvm-svn: 183552
|
|
This fixes PEI as previously described, but correctly handles the case where
the instruction defining the virtual register to be scavenged is the first in
the block. Arnold provided me with a bugpoint-reduced test case, but even that
seems too large to use as a regression test. If I'm successful in cleaning it
up then I'll commit that as well.
Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178919
|
|
Reverting because this breaks one of the LTO builders. Original commit message:
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178916
|
|
This change fixes a bug that I introduced in r178058. After a register is
scavenged using one of the available spills slots the instruction defining the
virtual register needs to be moved to after the spill code. The scavenger has
already processed the defining instruction so that registers killed by that
instruction are available for definition in that same instruction. Unfortunately,
after this, the scavenger needs to iterate through the spill code and then
visit, again, the instruction that defines the now-scavenged register. In order
to avoid confusion, the register scavenger needs the ability to 'back up'
through the spill code so that it can again process the instructions in the
appropriate order. Prior to this fix, once the scavenger reached the
just-moved instruction, it would assert if it killed any registers because,
having already processed the instruction, it believed they were undefined.
Unfortunately, I don't yet have a small test case. Thanks to Pranav Bhandarkar
for diagnosing the problem and testing this fix.
llvm-svn: 178845
|
|
simultaneous mappings
The previous algorithm could not deal properly with scavenging multiple virtual
registers because it kept only one live virtual -> physical mapping (and
iterated through operands in order). Now we don't maintain a current mapping,
but rather use replaceRegWith to completely remove the virtual register as
soon as the mapping is established.
In order to allow the register scavenger to return a physical register killed
by an instruction for definition by that same instruction, we now call
RS->forward(I) prior to eliminating virtual registers defined in I. This
requires a minor update to forward to ignore virtual registers.
These new features will be tested in forthcoming commits.
llvm-svn: 178058
|
|
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
llvm-svn: 177774
|
|
Add the current PEI register scavenger as a parameter to the
processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized callback.
This change is necessary in order to allow the PowerPC target code to
set the register scavenger frame index after the save-area offset
adjustments performed by processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized. Only
after these adjustments have been made is it possible to estimate
the size of the stack frame.
llvm-svn: 177108
|
|
llvm-svn: 176467
|
|
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
|
|
llvm-svn: 175457
|
|
llvm-svn: 174198
|
|
llvm-svn: 174088
|
|
Each target implementation was needlessly recomputing the index.
Part of rdar://13076458
llvm-svn: 174083
|
|
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
|
|
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
|
|
single attribute in the future.
llvm-svn: 170502
|
