| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
|
|
This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d.
This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were
raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy
this warrants immediate revert of the commit.
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
|
|
This removes links to rdar, which is an internal bug tracker that the
community doesn't have visibility into.
See further discussion at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/code-review-reminder-about-links-in-code-commit-messages/71847
|
|
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
|
|
This is currently failing the build due to some test errors.
This reverts commit ddbe14084da7f31d4b4b53e13d9f868d759f3673.
|
|
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
|
|
bindings.
Summary:
I have exposed the following function through libclang and the clang.cindex python bindings:
clang_CXXConstructor_isConvertingConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isCopyConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isDefaultConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isMoveConstructor,
clang_CXXMethod_isDefaulted
I need (some of) these methods for a C++ code model I am building in Python to drive a code generator.
Reviewers: compnerd, skalinichev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15469
llvm-svn: 267706
|
|
Expose isMutable via libClang and python bindings.
Patch by Jonathan B Coe!
llvm-svn: 251410
|
|
snippet involving templates.
Assertion hit was in ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl::getSourceRange().
llvm-svn: 247373
|
|
location for the template keyword when recovering.
Otherwise ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl::getSourceRange() will mistakenly consider itself as an implicit partial specialization
and lead to a crash.
Fixes rdar://14063074
llvm-svn: 183325
|
|
llvm-svn: 175860
|
|
llvm-svn: 163072
|
