aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-09-18[clang] [OpenMP] New OpenMP 6.0 - Parsing and Sema support for groupprivate ↵Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj1-0/+1
(#158134)
2025-08-27[clang] NFC: reintroduce clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h (#155050)Matheus Izvekov1-1/+1
This reintroduces `Type.h`, having earlier been renamed to `TypeBase.h`, as a redirection to `TypeBase.h`, and redirects most users to include the former instead. This is a preparatory patch for being able to provide inline definitions for `Type` methods which would otherwise cause a circular dependency with `Decl{,CXX}.h`. Doing these operations into their own NFC patch helps the git rename detection logic work, preserving the history. This patch makes clang just a little slower to build (~0.17%), just because it makes more code indirectly include `DeclCXX.h`.
2025-08-27[clang] NFC: rename clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h to TypeBase.h (#155049)Matheus Izvekov1-1/+1
This is a preparatory patch, to be able to provide inline definitions for `Type` functions which depend on `Decl{,CXX}.h`. As the latter also depends on `Type.h`, this would not be possible without some reorganizing. Splitting this rename into its own patch allows git to track this as a rename, and preserve all git history, and not force any code reformatting. A later NFC patch will reintroduce `Type.h` as redirection to `TypeBase.h`, rewriting most places back to directly including `Type.h` instead of `TypeBase.h`, leaving only a handful of places where this is necessary. Then yet a later patch will exploit this by making more stuff inline.
2025-08-09[clang] Improve nested name specifier AST representation (#147835)Matheus Izvekov1-28/+12
This is a major change on how we represent nested name qualifications in the AST. * The nested name specifier itself and how it's stored is changed. The prefixes for types are handled within the type hierarchy, which makes canonicalization for them super cheap, no memory allocation required. Also translating a type into nested name specifier form becomes a no-op. An identifier is stored as a DependentNameType. The nested name specifier gains a lightweight handle class, to be used instead of passing around pointers, which is similar to what is implemented for TemplateName. There is still one free bit available, and this handle can be used within a PointerUnion and PointerIntPair, which should keep bit-packing aficionados happy. * The ElaboratedType node is removed, all type nodes in which it could previously apply to can now store the elaborated keyword and name qualifier, tail allocating when present. * TagTypes can now point to the exact declaration found when producing these, as opposed to the previous situation of there only existing one TagType per entity. This increases the amount of type sugar retained, and can have several applications, for example in tracking module ownership, and other tools which care about source file origins, such as IWYU. These TagTypes are lazily allocated, in order to limit the increase in AST size. This patch offers a great performance benefit. It greatly improves compilation time for [stdexec](https://github.com/NVIDIA/stdexec). For one datapoint, for `test_on2.cpp` in that project, which is the slowest compiling test, this patch improves `-c` compilation time by about 7.2%, with the `-fsyntax-only` improvement being at ~12%. This has great results on compile-time-tracker as well: ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/700dce98-2cab-4aa8-97d1-b038c0bee831) This patch also further enables other optimziations in the future, and will reduce the performance impact of template specialization resugaring when that lands. It has some other miscelaneous drive-by fixes. About the review: Yes the patch is huge, sorry about that. Part of the reason is that I started by the nested name specifier part, before the ElaboratedType part, but that had a huge performance downside, as ElaboratedType is a big performance hog. I didn't have the steam to go back and change the patch after the fact. There is also a lot of internal API changes, and it made sense to remove ElaboratedType in one go, versus removing it from one type at a time, as that would present much more churn to the users. Also, the nested name specifier having a different API avoids missing changes related to how prefixes work now, which could make existing code compile but not work. How to review: The important changes are all in `clang/include/clang/AST` and `clang/lib/AST`, with also important changes in `clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h`. The rest and bulk of the changes are mostly consequences of the changes in API. PS: TagType::getDecl is renamed to `getOriginalDecl` in this patch, just for easier to rebasing. I plan to rename it back after this lands. Fixes #136624 Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43179 Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68670 Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/92757
2025-06-27[C++20] [Modules] Don't mark namespace decl as module local declarationChuanqi Xu1-0/+2
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/145975 According to [basic.namespace.general]/p2: > A namespace is never attached to a named module and never has a name > with module linkage.
2025-06-12[C++20] [Modules] Fix module local lookup ambiguousityChuanqi Xu1-0/+6
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61360 Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/129525 Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/143734 We shouldn't identify different module local decls in different modules as the same entity.
2025-05-19[clang] Use *Map::try_emplace (NFC) (#140477)Kazu Hirata1-2/+1
We can simplify the code with *Map::try_emplace where we need default-constructed values while avoding calling constructors when keys are already present.
2025-05-12[HLSL][RootSignature] Define and integrate rootsig clang attr and decl (#137690)Finn Plummer1-0/+1
- Defines a new declaration node `HLSLRootSignature` in `DeclNodes.td` that will consist of a `TrailingObjects` of the in-memory construction of the root signature, namely an array of `hlsl::rootsig::RootElement`s - Defines a new clang attr `RootSignature` which simply holds an identifier to a corresponding root signature declaration as above - Integrate the `HLSLRootSignatureParser` to construct the decl node in `ParseMicrosoftAttributes` and then attach the parsed attr with an identifier to the entry point function declaration. - Defines the various required declaration methods - Add testing that the declaration and reference attr are created correctly, and some syntactical error tests. It was previously proposed that we could have the root elements reference be stored directly as an additional member of the attribute and to not have a separate root signature decl. In contrast, by defining them separately as this change proposes, we will allow a unique root signature to have its own declaration in the AST tree. This allows us to only construct a single root signature for all duplicate root signature attributes. Having it located directly as a declaration might also prove advantageous when we consider root signature libraries. Resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/119011
2025-05-08[clang] Remove "unknown" from availability diags (#138610)Cyndy Ishida1-11/+15
Previously, diagnostics like `error: 'fNew' is unavailable: introduced in macOS 11 unknown` were getting emitted when the active target triple didn't have an environment tied to it. Instead, add a guard against this to avoid the `unknown`.
2025-05-04[clang] Use *(Set|Map)::contains (NFC) (#138464)Kazu Hirata1-2/+1
2025-04-29[C] Diagnose declarations hidden in C++ (#137368)Aaron Ballman1-1/+12
This introduces a new diagnostic, -Wc++-hidden-decl, which is grouped under -Wc++-compat, that diagnoses declarations which are valid in C but invalid in C++ due to the type being at the wrong scope. e.g., ``` struct S { struct T { int x; } t; }; struct T t; // Valid C, invalid C++ ``` This is implementing the other half of #21898
2025-04-19[clang] llvm::append_range (NFC) (#136440)Kazu Hirata1-1/+1
2025-03-06[OpenACC] implement AST/Sema for 'routine' construct with argumenterichkeane1-0/+1
The 'routine' construct has two forms, one which takes the name of a function that it applies to, and another where it implicitly figures it out based on the next declaration. This patch implements the former with the required restrictions on the name and the function-static-variables as specified. What has not been implemented is any clauses for this, any of the A.3.4 warnings, or the other form.
2025-03-03[OpenACC] Implement 'declare' construct AST/Semaerichkeane1-0/+2
The 'declare' construct is the first of two 'declaration' level constructs, so it is legal in any place a declaration is, including as a statement, which this accomplishes by wrapping it in a DeclStmt. All clauses on this have a 'same scope' requirement, which this enforces as declaration context instead, which makes it possible to implement these as a template. The 'link' and 'device_resident' clauses are also added, which have some similar/small restrictions, but are otherwise pretty rote. This patch implements all of the above.
2025-02-18[NFC] [clang] make isFlexibleArrayMemberLike Ctx const (#126656)Florian Mayer1-1/+1
it is not used mutably
2025-02-03[clang] Support member function poiners in Decl::getFunctionType() (#125077)Benjamin Maxwell1-0/+2
This seems consistent with the documentation, which claims it: ``` /// Looks through the Decl's underlying type to extract a FunctionType /// when possible. Will return null if the type underlying the Decl does not /// have a FunctionType. const FunctionType *getFunctionType(bool BlocksToo = true) const; ``` Note: This patch rewords this doc comment to clarify it includes various function pointer types. Without this, attaching attributes (which use `HasFunctionProto`) to member function pointers errors with: ``` error: '<attr>' only applies to non-K&R-style functions ``` ...which does not really make sense, since member functions are not K&C functions. With this change the Arm SME TypeAttrs work correctly on member function pointers. Note, however, that not all attributes work correctly when applied to function pointers or member function pointers. For example, `alloc_align` crashes when applied to a function pointer (on truck): https://godbolt.org/z/YvMhnhKfx (as it only expects a `FunctionDecl` not a `ParmVarDecl`). The same crash applies to member function pointers (for the same reason).
2025-01-29[Clang][P1061] Add stuctured binding packs (#121417)Jason Rice1-1/+1
This is an implementation of P1061 Structure Bindings Introduce a Pack without the ability to use packs outside of templates. There is a couple of ways the AST could have been sliced so let me know what you think. The only part of this change that I am unsure of is the serialization/deserialization stuff. I followed the implementation of other Exprs, but I do not really know how it is tested. Thank you for your time considering this. --------- Co-authored-by: Yanzuo Liu <zwuis@outlook.com>
2025-01-22[SYCL] AST support for SYCL kernel entry point functions. (#122379)Tom Honermann1-0/+4
A SYCL kernel entry point function is a non-member function or a static member function declared with the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute. Such functions define a pattern for an offload kernel entry point function to be generated to enable execution of a SYCL kernel on a device. A SYCL library implementation orchestrates the invocation of these functions with corresponding SYCL kernel arguments in response to calls to SYCL kernel invocation functions specified by the SYCL 2020 specification. The offload kernel entry point function (sometimes referred to as the SYCL kernel caller function) is generated from the SYCL kernel entry point function by a transformation of the function parameters followed by a transformation of the function body to replace references to the original parameters with references to the transformed ones. Exactly how parameters are transformed will be explained in a future change that implements non-trivial transformations. For now, it suffices to state that a given parameter of the SYCL kernel entry point function may be transformed to multiple parameters of the offload kernel entry point as needed to satisfy offload kernel argument passing requirements. Parameters that are decomposed in this way are reconstituted as local variables in the body of the generated offload kernel entry point function. For example, given the following SYCL kernel entry point function definition: ``` template<typename KernelNameType, typename KernelType> [[clang::sycl_kernel_entry_point(KernelNameType)]] void sycl_kernel_entry_point(KernelType kernel) { kernel(); } ``` and the following call: ``` struct Kernel { int dm1; int dm2; void operator()() const; }; Kernel k; sycl_kernel_entry_point<class kernel_name>(k); ``` the corresponding offload kernel entry point function that is generated might look as follows (assuming `Kernel` is a type that requires decomposition): ``` void offload_kernel_entry_point_for_kernel_name(int dm1, int dm2) { Kernel kernel{dm1, dm2}; kernel(); } ``` Other details of the generated offload kernel entry point function, such as its name and calling convention, are implementation details that need not be reflected in the AST and may differ across target devices. For that reason, only the transformation described above is represented in the AST; other details will be filled in during code generation. These transformations are represented using new AST nodes introduced with this change. `OutlinedFunctionDecl` holds a sequence of `ImplicitParamDecl` nodes and a sequence of statement nodes that correspond to the transformed parameters and function body. `SYCLKernelCallStmt` wraps the original function body and associates it with an `OutlinedFunctionDecl` instance. For the example above, the AST generated for the `sycl_kernel_entry_point<kernel_name>` specialization would look as follows: ``` FunctionDecl 'sycl_kernel_entry_point<kernel_name>(Kernel)' TemplateArgument type 'kernel_name' TemplateArgument type 'Kernel' ParmVarDecl kernel 'Kernel' SYCLKernelCallStmt CompoundStmt <original statements> OutlinedFunctionDecl ImplicitParamDecl 'dm1' 'int' ImplicitParamDecl 'dm2' 'int' CompoundStmt VarDecl 'kernel' 'Kernel' <initialization of 'kernel' with 'dm1' and 'dm2'> <transformed statements with redirected references of 'kernel'> ``` Any ODR-use of the SYCL kernel entry point function will (with future changes) suffice for the offload kernel entry point to be emitted. An actual call to the SYCL kernel entry point function will result in a call to the function. However, evaluation of a `SYCLKernelCallStmt` statement is a no-op, so such calls will have no effect other than to trigger emission of the offload kernel entry point. Additionally, as a related change inspired by code review feedback, these changes disallow use of the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute with functions defined with a _function-try-block_. The SYCL 2020 specification prohibits the use of C++ exceptions in device functions. Even if exceptions were not prohibited, it is unclear what the semantics would be for an exception that escapes the SYCL kernel entry point function; the boundary between host and device code could be an implicit noexcept boundary that results in program termination if violated, or the exception could perhaps be propagated to host code via the SYCL library. Pending support for C++ exceptions in device code and clear semantics for handling them at the host-device boundary, this change makes use of the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute with a function defined with a _function-try-block_ an error.
2025-01-17[C++20] [Modules] Support module level lookup (#122887) (#123281)Chuanqi Xu1-0/+8
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90154 This patch is also an optimization to the lookup process to utilize the information provided by `export` keyword. Previously, in the lookup process, the `export` keyword only takes part in the check part, it doesn't get involved in the lookup process. That said, previously, in a name lookup for 'name', we would load all of declarations with the name 'name' and check if these declarations are valid or not. It works well. But it is inefficient since it may load declarations that may not be wanted. Note that this patch actually did a trick in the lookup process instead of bring module information to DeclarationName or considering module information when deciding if two declarations are the same. So it may not be a surprise to me if there are missing cases. But it is not a regression. It should be already the case. Issue reports are welcomed. In this patch, I tried to split the big lookup table into a lookup table as before and a module local lookup table, which takes a combination of the ID of the DeclContext and hash value of the primary module name as the key. And refactored `DeclContext::lookup()` method to take the module information. So that a lookup in a DeclContext won't load declarations that are local to **other** modules. And also I think it is already beneficial to split the big lookup table since it may reduce the conflicts during lookups in the hash table. BTW, this patch introduced a **regression** for a reachability rule in C++20 but it was false-negative. See 'clang/test/CXX/module/module.interface/p7.cpp' for details. This patch is not expected to introduce any other regressions for non-c++20-modules users since the module local lookup table should be empty for them.
2025-01-17[AST] Add OriginalDC argument to ↵Chuanqi Xu1-5/+14
ExternalASTSource::FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName (#123152) Part for relanding https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122887. I split this to test where the performance regession comes from if modules are not used.
2025-01-16Revert "[C++20] [Modules] Support module level lookup (#122887)"Chuanqi Xu1-19/+4
This reverts commit 7201cae106260aeb3e9bbbb7d5291ff30f05076a.
2025-01-15[C++20] [Modules] Support module level lookup (#122887)Chuanqi Xu1-4/+19
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90154 This patch is also an optimization to the lookup process to utilize the information provided by `export` keyword. Previously, in the lookup process, the `export` keyword only takes part in the check part, it doesn't get involved in the lookup process. That said, previously, in a name lookup for 'name', we would load all of declarations with the name 'name' and check if these declarations are valid or not. It works well. But it is inefficient since it may load declarations that may not be wanted. Note that this patch actually did a trick in the lookup process instead of bring module information to DeclarationName or considering module information when deciding if two declarations are the same. So it may not be a surprise to me if there are missing cases. But it is not a regression. It should be already the case. Issue reports are welcomed. In this patch, I tried to split the big lookup table into a lookup table as before and a module local lookup table, which takes a combination of the ID of the DeclContext and hash value of the primary module name as the key. And refactored `DeclContext::lookup()` method to take the module information. So that a lookup in a DeclContext won't load declarations that are local to **other** modules. And also I think it is already beneficial to split the big lookup table since it may reduce the conflicts during lookups in the hash table. BTW, this patch introduced a **regression** for a reachability rule in C++20 but it was false-negative. See 'clang/test/CXX/module/module.interface/p7.cpp' for details. This patch is not expected to introduce any other regressions for non-c++20-modules users since the module local lookup table should be empty for them. --- On the API side, this patch unfortunately add a maybe-confusing argument `Module *NamedModule` to `ExternalASTSource::FindExternalVisibleDeclsByName()`. People may think we can get the information from the first argument `const DeclContext *DC`. But sadly there are declarations (e.g., namespace) can appear in multiple different modules as a single declaration. So we have to add additional information to indicate this.
2024-11-25[clang][NFC]add static for internal linkage function (#117482)Congcong Cai1-1/+2
Detected by misc-use-internal-linkage
2024-11-17[AST] Remove unused includes (NFC) (#116549)Kazu Hirata1-3/+0
Identified with misc-include-cleaner.
2024-10-10[C++20][Modules] Relax ODR check in unnamed modules (#111160)Dmitry Polukhin1-0/+4
Summary: Option `-fskip-odr-check-in-gmf` is set by default and I think it is what most of C++ developers want. But in header units, Clang ODR checking is too strict, making them hard to use, as seen in the example in the diff. This diff relaxes ODR checks for unnamed modules to match GMF ODR checking. Test Plan: check-clang
2024-08-09Return available function types for BindingDecls. (#102196)Samira Bazuzi1-3/+8
Only return nullptr when we don't have an available QualType.
2024-08-08Reland [C++20] [Modules] [Itanium ABI] Generate the vtable in the mod… ↵Chuanqi Xu1-9/+25
(#102287) Reland https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912 The differences of this PR between https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912 are: - Fixed a regression in `Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit()` in DeclBase.cpp pointed by @mizvekov and add the corresponding test. - Fixed the regression in windows https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97447. The changes are in `CodeGenModule::getVTableLinkage` from `clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp`. According to the feedbacks from MSVC devs, the linkage of vtables won't affected by modules. So I simply skipped the case for MSVC. Given this is more or less fundamental to the use of modules. I hope we can backport this to 19.x.
2024-08-05[C++20] [Modules] Skip ODR checks in implicit global modulesChuanqi Xu1-0/+4
Previously we skipped the ODR checks in explicit global modules. And due to similar reasons, we should skip the ODR checks in implicit global modules too.
2024-07-26[Clang] Remove `IDNS_Ordinary` flag in ↵Yanzuo Liu1-2/+1
`IndirectFieldDecl::IdentifierNamespace` (#100525) There is a `IDNS_Ordinary` flag in `IndirectFieldDecl::IdentifierNamespace` so that members in nested anonymous struct/union can be found as ordinary identifiers. ```c struct S { struct { int x; }; // Previous behaviour: `x` in previous line is found // Expected: nothing is found int arr[sizeof(x)]; }; ``` This PR fixes this issue. Fixes #31295.
2024-07-15[Clang][AST] Move NamespaceDecl bits to DeclContext (#98567)Krystian Stasiowski1-2/+1
Currently, `NamespaceDecl` has a member `AnonOrFirstNamespaceAndFlags` which stores a few pieces of data: - a bit indicating whether the namespace was declared `inline`, and - a bit indicating whether the namespace was declared as a _nested-namespace-definition_, and - a pointer a `NamespaceDecl` that either stores: - a pointer to the first declaration of that namespace if the declaration is no the first declaration, or - a pointer to the unnamed namespace that inhabits the namespace otherwise. `Redeclarable` already stores a pointer to the first declaration of an entity, so it's unnecessary to store this in `NamespaceDecl`. `DeclContext` has 8 bytes in which various bitfields can be stored for a declaration, so it's not necessary to store these in `NamespaceDecl` either. We only need to store a pointer to the unnamed namespace that inhabits the first declaration of a namespace. This patch moves the two bits currently stored in `NamespaceDecl` to `DeclContext`, and only stores a pointer to the unnamed namespace that inhabits a namespace in the first declaration of that namespace. Since `getOriginalNamespace` always returns the same `NamespaceDecl` as `getFirstDecl`, this function is removed to avoid confusion.
2024-07-12[NFC] [Modules] Introduce 'DeclBase::isInNamedModule' interfaceChuanqi Xu1-0/+4
This patch introduces DeclBase::isInNamedModule API to ease the use of modules slightly.
2024-07-10Revert "[C++20] [Modules] [Itanium ABI] Generate the vtable in the module ↵Chuanqi Xu1-19/+11
unit of dynamic classes (#75912)" This reverts commit 18f3bcbb13ca83d33223b00761d8cddf463e9ffb, 15bb02650e26875c48889053d6a9697444583721 and 99873b35da7ecb905143c8a6b8deca4d4416f1a9. See the post commit message in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912 to see the reasons.
2024-06-19[NFC] [Serialization] Unify how LocalDeclID can be createdChuanqi Xu1-1/+1
Now we can create a LocalDeclID directly with an integer without verifying. It may be hard to refactor if we want to change the way we serialize DeclIDs (See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95897). Also it is hard for us to debug if someday someone construct a LocalDeclID with an incorrect value. So in this patch, I tried to unify the way we can construct a LocalDeclID in ASTReader, where we will construct the LocalDeclID from the serialized data. Also, now we can verify the constructed LocalDeclID sooner in the new interface.
2024-06-18[HLSL] Strict Availability Diagnostics (#93860)Helena Kotas1-1/+1
Implements HLSL availability diagnostics' strict mode. HLSL availability diagnostics emits errors or warning when unavailable shader APIs are used. Unavailable shader APIs are APIs that are exposed in HLSL code but are not available in the target shader stage or shader model version. In the strict mode the compiler emits an error when an unavailable API is found in any function regardless of whether it is reachable from the shader entry point or not. This mode is enabled by ``-fhlsl-strict-availability``. See HLSL Availability Diagnostics design doc [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/docs/HLSL/AvailabilityDiagnostics.rst) for more details. Fixes #90096
2024-06-17[C++20] [Modules] [Itanium ABI] Generate the vtable in the module unit of ↵Chuanqi Xu1-0/+9
dynamic classes (#75912) Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70585 and reflect https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/170. The significant change of the patch is: for dynamic classes attached to module units, we generate the vtable to the attached module units directly and the key functions for such classes is meaningless.
2024-06-11[clang] Replace X && isa<Y>(X) with isa_and_nonnull<Y>(X). NFC (#94987)Pavel Samolysov1-1/+1
This addresses a clang-tidy suggestion.
2024-06-07[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)Chuanqi Xu1-7/+33
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes, if the changes is not relevant with `X`, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. For the specific patch, we hope if the changes was about irrelevant declaration changes, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. **However**, I found the patch itself is not very useful in practice, since the adding or removing declarations, will change the state of identifiers and types in most cases. That said, for the most simple example, ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export void a() {} // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` the BMI of `onlyUseB` will change after we change the implementation of `partA.cppm` to `partA.v1.cppm`. Since `partA.v1.cppm` introduces new identifiers and types (the function prototype). So in this patch, we have to write the tests as: ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA(int) { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` so that the new introduced declaration `int getA(int)` doesn't introduce new identifiers and types, then the BMI of `onlyUseB` can keep unchanged. While it looks not so great, the patch should be the base of the patch to erase the transitive change for identifiers and types since I don't know how can we introduce new types and identifiers without introducing new declarations. Given how tightly the relationship between declarations, types and identifiers, I think we can only reach the ideal state after we made the series for all of the three entties. The design of the patch is similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, which extends the 32-bit DeclID to 64-bit and use the higher bits to store the module file index and the lower bits to store the Local Decl ID. A slight difference is that we only use 48 bits to store the new DeclID since we try to use the higher 16 bits to store the module ID in the prefix of Decl class. Previously, we use 32 bits to store the module ID and 32 bits to store the DeclID. I don't want to allocate additional space so I tried to make the additional space the same as 64 bits. An potential interesting thing here is about the relationship between the module ID and the module file index. I feel we can get the module file index by the module ID. But I didn't prove it or implement it. Since I want to make the patch itself as small as possible. We can make it in the future if we want. Another change in the patch is the new concept Decl Index, which means the index of the very big array `DeclsLoaded` in ASTReader. Previously, the index of a loaded declaration is simply the Decl ID minus PREDEFINED_DECL_NUMs. So there are some places they got used ambiguously. But this patch tried to split these two concepts. As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 did, the change will increase the on-disk PCM file sizes. As the declaration ID may be the most IDs in the PCM file, this can have the biggest impact on the size. In my experiments, this change will bring 6.6% increase of the on-disk PCM size. No compile-time performance regression observed. Given the benefits in the motivation example, I think the cost is worthwhile.
2024-06-07Revert "[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)"Chuanqi Xu1-33/+7
This reverts commit 5c104879c1a98eeb845c03e7c45206bd48e88f0c. The ArmV7 bot is complaining the change breaks the alignment.
2024-06-07[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)Chuanqi Xu1-7/+33
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes, if the changes is not relevant with `X`, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. For the specific patch, we hope if the changes was about irrelevant declaration changes, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. **However**, I found the patch itself is not very useful in practice, since the adding or removing declarations, will change the state of identifiers and types in most cases. That said, for the most simple example, ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export void a() {} // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` the BMI of `onlyUseB` will change after we change the implementation of `partA.cppm` to `partA.v1.cppm`. Since `partA.v1.cppm` introduces new identifiers and types (the function prototype). So in this patch, we have to write the tests as: ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA(int) { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` so that the new introduced declaration `int getA(int)` doesn't introduce new identifiers and types, then the BMI of `onlyUseB` can keep unchanged. While it looks not so great, the patch should be the base of the patch to erase the transitive change for identifiers and types since I don't know how can we introduce new types and identifiers without introducing new declarations. Given how tightly the relationship between declarations, types and identifiers, I think we can only reach the ideal state after we made the series for all of the three entties. The design of the patch is similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, which extends the 32-bit DeclID to 64-bit and use the higher bits to store the module file index and the lower bits to store the Local Decl ID. A slight difference is that we only use 48 bits to store the new DeclID since we try to use the higher 16 bits to store the module ID in the prefix of Decl class. Previously, we use 32 bits to store the module ID and 32 bits to store the DeclID. I don't want to allocate additional space so I tried to make the additional space the same as 64 bits. An potential interesting thing here is about the relationship between the module ID and the module file index. I feel we can get the module file index by the module ID. But I didn't prove it or implement it. Since I want to make the patch itself as small as possible. We can make it in the future if we want. Another change in the patch is the new concept Decl Index, which means the index of the very big array `DeclsLoaded` in ASTReader. Previously, the index of a loaded declaration is simply the Decl ID minus PREDEFINED_DECL_NUMs. So there are some places they got used ambiguously. But this patch tried to split these two concepts. As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 did, the change will increase the on-disk PCM file sizes. As the declaration ID may be the most IDs in the PCM file, this can have the biggest impact on the size. In my experiments, this change will bring 6.6% increase of the on-disk PCM size. No compile-time performance regression observed. Given the benefits in the motivation example, I think the cost is worthwhile.
2024-06-06Revert "[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)"Chuanqi Xu1-33/+7
This reverts commit 97c866f6c86456b3316006e6beff47e68a81c00a. This fails on 32bit machines. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083
2024-06-06[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)Chuanqi Xu1-7/+33
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes, if the changes is not relevant with `X`, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. For the specific patch, we hope if the changes was about irrelevant declaration changes, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. **However**, I found the patch itself is not very useful in practice, since the adding or removing declarations, will change the state of identifiers and types in most cases. That said, for the most simple example, ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export void a() {} // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` the BMI of `onlyUseB` will change after we change the implementation of `partA.cppm` to `partA.v1.cppm`. Since `partA.v1.cppm` introduces new identifiers and types (the function prototype). So in this patch, we have to write the tests as: ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA(int) { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` so that the new introduced declaration `int getA(int)` doesn't introduce new identifiers and types, then the BMI of `onlyUseB` can keep unchanged. While it looks not so great, the patch should be the base of the patch to erase the transitive change for identifiers and types since I don't know how can we introduce new types and identifiers without introducing new declarations. Given how tightly the relationship between declarations, types and identifiers, I think we can only reach the ideal state after we made the series for all of the three entties. The design of the patch is similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, which extends the 32-bit DeclID to 64-bit and use the higher bits to store the module file index and the lower bits to store the Local Decl ID. A slight difference is that we only use 48 bits to store the new DeclID since we try to use the higher 16 bits to store the module ID in the prefix of Decl class. Previously, we use 32 bits to store the module ID and 32 bits to store the DeclID. I don't want to allocate additional space so I tried to make the additional space the same as 64 bits. An potential interesting thing here is about the relationship between the module ID and the module file index. I feel we can get the module file index by the module ID. But I didn't prove it or implement it. Since I want to make the patch itself as small as possible. We can make it in the future if we want. Another change in the patch is the new concept Decl Index, which means the index of the very big array `DeclsLoaded` in ASTReader. Previously, the index of a loaded declaration is simply the Decl ID minus PREDEFINED_DECL_NUMs. So there are some places they got used ambiguously. But this patch tried to split these two concepts. As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 did, the change will increase the on-disk PCM file sizes. As the declaration ID may be the most IDs in the PCM file, this can have the biggest impact on the size. In my experiments, this change will bring 6.6% increase of the on-disk PCM size. No compile-time performance regression observed. Given the benefits in the motivation example, I think the cost is worthwhile.
2024-06-04[NFC] [AST] Introduce Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit and ↵Chuanqi Xu1-12/+11
Decl::shouldEmitInExternalSource Motivated by the review process in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75912. This can also help to simplify the code slightly.
2024-06-04Revert "[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)"Chuanqi Xu1-32/+7
This reverts commit d8ec452db016f359feeec28994f6560b30b49824. This fails on LLDB macOS CI. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083 for details.
2024-06-04[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)Chuanqi Xu1-7/+32
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes, if the changes is not relevant with `X`, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. For the specific patch, we hope if the changes was about irrelevant declaration changes, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. **However**, I found the patch itself is not very useful in practice, since the adding or removing declarations, will change the state of identifiers and types in most cases. That said, for the most simple example, ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export void a() {} // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` the BMI of `onlyUseB` will change after we change the implementation of `partA.cppm` to `partA.v1.cppm`. Since `partA.v1.cppm` introduces new identifiers and types (the function prototype). So in this patch, we have to write the tests as: ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA(int) { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` so that the new introduced declaration `int getA(int)` doesn't introduce new identifiers and types, then the BMI of `onlyUseB` can keep unchanged. While it looks not so great, the patch should be the base of the patch to erase the transitive change for identifiers and types since I don't know how can we introduce new types and identifiers without introducing new declarations. Given how tightly the relationship between declarations, types and identifiers, I think we can only reach the ideal state after we made the series for all of the three entties. The design of the patch is similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, which extends the 32-bit DeclID to 64-bit and use the higher bits to store the module file index and the lower bits to store the Local Decl ID. A slight difference is that we only use 48 bits to store the new DeclID since we try to use the higher 16 bits to store the module ID in the prefix of Decl class. Previously, we use 32 bits to store the module ID and 32 bits to store the DeclID. I don't want to allocate additional space so I tried to make the additional space the same as 64 bits. An potential interesting thing here is about the relationship between the module ID and the module file index. I feel we can get the module file index by the module ID. But I didn't prove it or implement it. Since I want to make the patch itself as small as possible. We can make it in the future if we want. Another change in the patch is the new concept Decl Index, which means the index of the very big array `DeclsLoaded` in ASTReader. Previously, the index of a loaded declaration is simply the Decl ID minus PREDEFINED_DECL_NUMs. So there are some places they got used ambiguously. But this patch tried to split these two concepts. As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 did, the change will increase the on-disk PCM file sizes. As the declaration ID may be the most IDs in the PCM file, this can have the biggest impact on the size. In my experiments, this change will bring 6.6% increase of the on-disk PCM size. No compile-time performance regression observed. Given the benefits in the motivation example, I think the cost is worthwhile.
2024-06-03Revert "[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)"Chuanqi Xu1-33/+7
This reverts commit ccb73e882b2d727877cfda42a14a6979cfd31f04. It looks like there are some bots complaining about the patch. See the post commit comment in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083 to track it.
2024-06-03[serialization] no transitive decl change (#92083)Chuanqi Xu1-7/+33
Following of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 #### Motivation Example The motivation of the patch series is that, for a module interface unit `X`, when the dependent modules of `X` changes, if the changes is not relevant with `X`, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. For the specific patch, we hope if the changes was about irrelevant declaration changes, we hope the BMI of `X` won't change. **However**, I found the patch itself is not very useful in practice, since the adding or removing declarations, will change the state of identifiers and types in most cases. That said, for the most simple example, ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export void a() {} // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` the BMI of `onlyUseB` will change after we change the implementation of `partA.cppm` to `partA.v1.cppm`. Since `partA.v1.cppm` introduces new identifiers and types (the function prototype). So in this patch, we have to write the tests as: ``` // partA.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partA.v1.cppm export module m:partA; export int getA() { ... } export int getA(int) { ... } export int getA2(int) { ... } // partB.cppm export module m:partB; export void b() {} // m.cppm export module m; export import :partA; export import :partB; // onlyUseB; export module onlyUseB; import m; export inline void onluUseB() { b(); } ``` so that the new introduced declaration `int getA(int)` doesn't introduce new identifiers and types, then the BMI of `onlyUseB` can keep unchanged. While it looks not so great, the patch should be the base of the patch to erase the transitive change for identifiers and types since I don't know how can we introduce new types and identifiers without introducing new declarations. Given how tightly the relationship between declarations, types and identifiers, I think we can only reach the ideal state after we made the series for all of the three entties. #### Design details The design of the patch is similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912, which extends the 32-bit DeclID to 64-bit and use the higher bits to store the module file index and the lower bits to store the Local Decl ID. A slight difference is that we only use 48 bits to store the new DeclID since we try to use the higher 16 bits to store the module ID in the prefix of Decl class. Previously, we use 32 bits to store the module ID and 32 bits to store the DeclID. I don't want to allocate additional space so I tried to make the additional space the same as 64 bits. An potential interesting thing here is about the relationship between the module ID and the module file index. I feel we can get the module file index by the module ID. But I didn't prove it or implement it. Since I want to make the patch itself as small as possible. We can make it in the future if we want. Another change in the patch is the new concept Decl Index, which means the index of the very big array `DeclsLoaded` in ASTReader. Previously, the index of a loaded declaration is simply the Decl ID minus PREDEFINED_DECL_NUMs. So there are some places they got used ambiguously. But this patch tried to split these two concepts. #### Overhead As https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86912 did, the change will increase the on-disk PCM file sizes. As the declaration ID may be the most IDs in the PCM file, this can have the biggest impact on the size. In my experiments, this change will bring 6.6% increase of the on-disk PCM size. No compile-time performance regression observed. Given the benefits in the motivation example, I think the cost is worthwhile.
2024-05-29[HLSL] Default and Relaxed Availability Diagnostics (#92704)Helena Kotas1-1/+2
Implements HLSL availability diagnostics' default and relaxed mode. HLSL availability diagnostics emits errors or warning when unavailable shader APIs are used. Unavailable shader APIs are APIs that are exposed in HLSL code but are not available in the target shader stage or shader model version. In the default mode the compiler emits an error when an unavailable API is found in a code that is reachable from the shader entry point function. In the future this check will also extended to exported library functions (#92073). The relaxed diagnostic mode is the same except the compiler emits a warning. This mode is enabled by ``-Wno-error=hlsl-availability``. See HLSL Availability Diagnostics design doc [here](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/docs/HLSL/AvailabilityDiagnostics.rst) for more details. Fixes #90095
2024-05-19[Clang][HLSL] Add environment parameter to availability attribute (#89809)Helena Kotas1-6/+22
Add `environment` parameter to Clang availability attribute. The allowed values for this parameter are a subset of values allowed in the `llvm::Triple` environment component. If the `environment` parameters is present, the declared availability attribute applies only to targets with the same platform and environment. This new parameter will be initially used for annotating HLSL functions for the `shadermodel` platform because in HLSL built-in function availability can depend not just on the shader model version (mapped to `llvm::Triple::OSType`) but also on the target shader stage (mapped to `llvm::Triple::EnvironmentType`). See example in #89802 and microsoft/hlsl-specs#204 for more details. The environment parameter is currently supported only for HLSL. Fixes #89802
2024-04-29[Clang] Address post commit feedbacks in #89906 (#90495)cor3ntin1-1/+1
* Fix a leak * Fix a maybe unused warning * Fix incorrect cxx_status entry
2024-04-28[Clang] Implement C++26 Attributes for Structured Bindings (P0609R3) (#89906)cor3ntin1-1/+3
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p0609r3.pdf We support this feature in all language mode. maybe_unused applied to a binding makes the whole declaration unused.