aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp9
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp13
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp24
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp17
4 files changed, 56 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
index 9c2bc34..48ab0eb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCasts.cpp
@@ -435,6 +435,15 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitTrunc(TruncInst &CI) {
if (Instruction *Result = commonCastTransforms(CI))
return Result;
+ // Test if the trunc is the user of a select which is part of a
+ // minimum or maximum operation. If so, don't do any more simplification.
+ // Even simplifying demanded bits can break the canonical form of a
+ // min/max.
+ Value *LHS, *RHS;
+ if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(CI.getOperand(0)))
+ if (matchSelectPattern(SI, LHS, RHS) != SPF_UNKNOWN)
+ return nullptr;
+
// See if we can simplify any instructions used by the input whose sole
// purpose is to compute bits we don't care about.
if (SimplifyDemandedInstructionBits(CI))
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
index 223bba0..4827686 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
@@ -3970,6 +3970,19 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFCmpInst(FCmpInst &I) {
}
}
+ // Test if the FCmpInst instruction is used exclusively by a select as
+ // part of a minimum or maximum operation. If so, refrain from doing
+ // any other folding. This helps out other analyses which understand
+ // non-obfuscated minimum and maximum idioms, such as ScalarEvolution
+ // and CodeGen. And in this case, at least one of the comparison
+ // operands has at least one user besides the compare (the select),
+ // which would often largely negate the benefit of folding anyway.
+ if (I.hasOneUse())
+ if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(*I.user_begin()))
+ if ((SI->getOperand(1) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(2) == Op1) ||
+ (SI->getOperand(2) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(1) == Op1))
+ return nullptr;
+
// Handle fcmp with constant RHS
if (Constant *RHSC = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
if (Instruction *LHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Op0))
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
index b13d3ed..d2fbcdd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp
@@ -1154,18 +1154,30 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
}
// See if we can fold the select into one of our operands.
- if (SI.getType()->isIntegerTy()) {
+ if (SI.getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy()) {
if (Instruction *FoldI = FoldSelectIntoOp(SI, TrueVal, FalseVal))
return FoldI;
Value *LHS, *RHS, *LHS2, *RHS2;
- SelectPatternFlavor SPF = matchSelectPattern(&SI, LHS, RHS);
+ Instruction::CastOps CastOp;
+ SelectPatternFlavor SPF = matchSelectPattern(&SI, LHS, RHS, &CastOp);
- // MAX(MAX(a, b), a) -> MAX(a, b)
- // MIN(MIN(a, b), a) -> MIN(a, b)
- // MAX(MIN(a, b), a) -> a
- // MIN(MAX(a, b), a) -> a
if (SPF) {
+ // Canonicalize so that type casts are outside select patterns.
+ if (LHS->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() !=
+ SI.getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits()) {
+ CmpInst::Predicate Pred = getICmpPredicateForMinMax(SPF);
+ Value *Cmp = Builder->CreateICmp(Pred, LHS, RHS);
+ Value *NewSI = Builder->CreateCast(CastOp,
+ Builder->CreateSelect(Cmp, LHS, RHS),
+ SI.getType());
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(SI, NewSI);
+ }
+
+ // MAX(MAX(a, b), a) -> MAX(a, b)
+ // MIN(MIN(a, b), a) -> MIN(a, b)
+ // MAX(MIN(a, b), a) -> a
+ // MIN(MAX(a, b), a) -> a
if (SelectPatternFlavor SPF2 = matchSelectPattern(LHS, LHS2, RHS2))
if (Instruction *R = FoldSPFofSPF(cast<Instruction>(LHS),SPF2,LHS2,RHS2,
SI, SPF, RHS))
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
index 53ab81d..b060453 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
@@ -714,6 +714,22 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoSelect(Instruction &Op, SelectInst *SI) {
return nullptr;
}
+ // Test if a CmpInst instruction is used exclusively by a select as
+ // part of a minimum or maximum operation. If so, refrain from doing
+ // any other folding. This helps out other analyses which understand
+ // non-obfuscated minimum and maximum idioms, such as ScalarEvolution
+ // and CodeGen. And in this case, at least one of the comparison
+ // operands has at least one user besides the compare (the select),
+ // which would often largely negate the benefit of folding anyway.
+ if (auto *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(SI->getCondition())) {
+ if (CI->hasOneUse()) {
+ Value *Op0 = CI->getOperand(0), *Op1 = CI->getOperand(1);
+ if ((SI->getOperand(1) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(2) == Op1) ||
+ (SI->getOperand(2) == Op0 && SI->getOperand(1) == Op1))
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ }
+
Value *SelectTrueVal = FoldOperationIntoSelectOperand(Op, TV, this);
Value *SelectFalseVal = FoldOperationIntoSelectOperand(Op, FV, this);
@@ -723,7 +739,6 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoSelect(Instruction &Op, SelectInst *SI) {
return nullptr;
}
-
/// FoldOpIntoPhi - Given a binary operator, cast instruction, or select which
/// has a PHI node as operand #0, see if we can fold the instruction into the
/// PHI (which is only possible if all operands to the PHI are constants).