diff options
author | Balazs Benics <benicsbalazs@gmail.com> | 2025-09-11 16:48:53 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2025-09-11 16:48:53 +0200 |
commit | 38b948bd4b9bd0ed532c3bea69e0038b3dffe80a (patch) | |
tree | b852969bdc6f9c759b23f4380a3d2e2808f357b4 /llvm/unittests/Support/MathExtrasTest.cpp | |
parent | 343186deefcafdcf4e5a63e669a8ddc7ec9fd415 (diff) | |
download | llvm-38b948bd4b9bd0ed532c3bea69e0038b3dffe80a.zip llvm-38b948bd4b9bd0ed532c3bea69e0038b3dffe80a.tar.gz llvm-38b948bd4b9bd0ed532c3bea69e0038b3dffe80a.tar.bz2 |
[analyzer] Revert #115918, so empty base class optimization works again (#157480)
Tldr;
We can't unconditionally trivially copy empty classes because that would
clobber the stored entries in the object that the optimized empty class
overlaps with.
This regression was introduced by #115918, which introduced other
clobbering issues, like the handling of `[[no_unique_address]]` fields
in #137252.
Read issue #157467 for the detailed explanation, but in short, I'd
propose reverting the original patch because these was a lot of problems
with it for arguably not much gain.
In particular, that patch was motivated by unifying the handling of
classes so that copy events would be triggered for a class no matter if
it had data members or not.
So in hindsight, it was not worth it.
I plan to backport this to clang-21 as well, and mention in the release
notes that this should fix the regression from clang-20.
PS: Also an interesting read [D43714](https://reviews.llvm.org/D43714)
in hindsight.
Fixes #157467
CPP-6574
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/unittests/Support/MathExtrasTest.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions