diff options
| author | Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk> | 2018-04-05 13:11:36 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk> | 2018-04-05 13:11:36 +0000 |
| commit | 1d793b8ac545344265f6ec3fa58fc37e186833a7 (patch) | |
| tree | d5a6de96bf8f053801cced8ae5530e377bbeb4db /llvm/unittests/Support/ErrorTest.cpp | |
| parent | 8eda4b0dc0ace4e77d781dc7d30771c256f51dbc (diff) | |
| download | llvm-1d793b8ac545344265f6ec3fa58fc37e186833a7.zip llvm-1d793b8ac545344265f6ec3fa58fc37e186833a7.tar.gz llvm-1d793b8ac545344265f6ec3fa58fc37e186833a7.tar.bz2 | |
[SchedModel] Complete models shouldn't match against itineraries when they don't use them (PR35639)
For schedule models that don't use itineraries, checkCompleteness still checks that an instruction has a matching itinerary instead of skipping and going straight to matching the InstRWs. That doesn't seem to match what happens in TargetSchedule.cpp
This patch causes problems for a number of models that had been incorrectly flagged as complete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43235
llvm-svn: 329280
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/unittests/Support/ErrorTest.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions