diff options
author | Chuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com> | 2022-01-25 11:12:25 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chuanqi Xu <yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com> | 2022-02-16 13:42:52 +0800 |
commit | a2609be0b284bfa55edf78e607eb426679cfea3d (patch) | |
tree | 0696b463625f6ab94a67668805c6e6b2e9b91ebf /llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp | |
parent | d30ca5e2e23fe50dcd8d5d602bf7cfc61b4c1561 (diff) | |
download | llvm-a2609be0b284bfa55edf78e607eb426679cfea3d.zip llvm-a2609be0b284bfa55edf78e607eb426679cfea3d.tar.gz llvm-a2609be0b284bfa55edf78e607eb426679cfea3d.tar.bz2 |
[ValueTracking] Checking haveNoCommonBitsSet for (x & y) and ~(x | y)
This one tries to fix:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53357.
Simply, this one would check (x & y) and ~(x | y) in
haveNoCommonBitsSet. Since they shouldn't have common bits (we could
traverse the case by enumerating), and we could convert this one to (x &
y) | ~(x | y) . Then the compiler could handle it in
InstCombineAndOrXor.
Further more, since ((x & y) + (~x & ~y)) would be converted to ((x & y)
+ ~(x | y)), this patch would fix it too.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/qsKzRS
Reviewed By: spatel, xbolva00, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118094
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp | 56 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp index 277b024..e8148ab 100644 --- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp +++ b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/ValueTrackingTest.cpp @@ -1745,6 +1745,62 @@ TEST_F(ValueTrackingTest, HaveNoCommonBitsSet) { EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(LHS, RHS, DL)); EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(RHS, LHS, DL)); } + { + // Check for (A & B) and ~(A | B) + auto M = parseModule(R"( + define void @test(i32 %A, i32 %B) { + %LHS = and i32 %A, %B + %or = or i32 %A, %B + %RHS = xor i32 %or, -1 + + %LHS2 = and i32 %B, %A + %or2 = or i32 %A, %B + %RHS2 = xor i32 %or2, -1 + + ret void + })"); + + auto *F = M->getFunction("test"); + const DataLayout &DL = M->getDataLayout(); + + auto *LHS = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "LHS"); + auto *RHS = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "RHS"); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(LHS, RHS, DL)); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(RHS, LHS, DL)); + + auto *LHS2 = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "LHS2"); + auto *RHS2 = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "RHS2"); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(LHS2, RHS2, DL)); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(RHS2, LHS2, DL)); + } + { + // Check for (A & B) and ~(A | B) in vector version + auto M = parseModule(R"( + define void @test(<2 x i32> %A, <2 x i32> %B) { + %LHS = and <2 x i32> %A, %B + %or = or <2 x i32> %A, %B + %RHS = xor <2 x i32> %or, <i32 -1, i32 -1> + + %LHS2 = and <2 x i32> %B, %A + %or2 = or <2 x i32> %A, %B + %RHS2 = xor <2 x i32> %or2, <i32 -1, i32 -1> + + ret void + })"); + + auto *F = M->getFunction("test"); + const DataLayout &DL = M->getDataLayout(); + + auto *LHS = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "LHS"); + auto *RHS = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "RHS"); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(LHS, RHS, DL)); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(RHS, LHS, DL)); + + auto *LHS2 = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "LHS2"); + auto *RHS2 = findInstructionByNameOrNull(F, "RHS2"); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(LHS2, RHS2, DL)); + EXPECT_TRUE(haveNoCommonBitsSet(RHS2, LHS2, DL)); + } } class IsBytewiseValueTest : public ValueTrackingTest, |