aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Green <david.green@arm.com>2018-07-01 12:47:30 +0000
committerDavid Green <david.green@arm.com>2018-07-01 12:47:30 +0000
commit963401d2be2d5ba1cfe3471f241f4c7585c33010 (patch)
treea24eb44f15e16e9b5240a358168503101ac9b5c3 /llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
parent8dabda70afba00d82f30e83bf0d513076eba37ab (diff)
downloadllvm-963401d2be2d5ba1cfe3471f241f4c7585c33010.zip
llvm-963401d2be2d5ba1cfe3471f241f4c7585c33010.tar.gz
llvm-963401d2be2d5ba1cfe3471f241f4c7585c33010.tar.bz2
[UnrollAndJam] New Unroll and Jam pass
This is a simple implementation of the unroll-and-jam classical loop optimisation. The basic idea is that we take an outer loop of the form: for i.. ForeBlocks(i) for j.. SubLoopBlocks(i, j) AftBlocks(i) Instead of doing normal inner or outer unrolling, we unroll as follows: for i... i+=2 ForeBlocks(i) ForeBlocks(i+1) for j.. SubLoopBlocks(i, j) SubLoopBlocks(i+1, j) AftBlocks(i) AftBlocks(i+1) Remainder Loop So we have unrolled the outer loop, then jammed the two inner loops into one. This can lead to a simpler inner loop if memory accesses can be shared between the now jammed loops. To do this we have to prove that this is all safe, both for the memory accesses (using dependence analysis) and that ForeBlocks(i+1) can move before AftBlocks(i) and SubLoopBlocks(i, j). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41953 llvm-svn: 336062
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
index c8cca70..04b8c14 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopUnroll.cpp
@@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ UnrollVerifyDomtree("unroll-verify-domtree", cl::Hidden,
/// Convert the instruction operands from referencing the current values into
/// those specified by VMap.
-static inline void remapInstruction(Instruction *I,
- ValueToValueMapTy &VMap) {
+void llvm::remapInstruction(Instruction *I, ValueToValueMapTy &VMap) {
for (unsigned op = 0, E = I->getNumOperands(); op != E; ++op) {
Value *Op = I->getOperand(op);
@@ -98,9 +97,9 @@ static inline void remapInstruction(Instruction *I,
/// Folds a basic block into its predecessor if it only has one predecessor, and
/// that predecessor only has one successor.
/// The LoopInfo Analysis that is passed will be kept consistent.
-static BasicBlock *
-foldBlockIntoPredecessor(BasicBlock *BB, LoopInfo *LI, ScalarEvolution *SE,
- DominatorTree *DT) {
+BasicBlock *llvm::foldBlockIntoPredecessor(BasicBlock *BB, LoopInfo *LI,
+ ScalarEvolution *SE,
+ DominatorTree *DT) {
// Merge basic blocks into their predecessor if there is only one distinct
// pred, and if there is only one distinct successor of the predecessor, and
// if there are no PHI nodes.
@@ -110,7 +109,8 @@ foldBlockIntoPredecessor(BasicBlock *BB, LoopInfo *LI, ScalarEvolution *SE,
if (OnlyPred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() != 1)
return nullptr;
- LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Merging: " << *BB << "into: " << *OnlyPred);
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Merging: " << BB->getName() << " into "
+ << OnlyPred->getName() << "\n");
// Resolve any PHI nodes at the start of the block. They are all
// guaranteed to have exactly one entry if they exist, unless there are
@@ -255,9 +255,9 @@ static bool isEpilogProfitable(Loop *L) {
/// Perform some cleanup and simplifications on loops after unrolling. It is
/// useful to simplify the IV's in the new loop, as well as do a quick
/// simplify/dce pass of the instructions.
-static void simplifyLoopAfterUnroll(Loop *L, bool SimplifyIVs, LoopInfo *LI,
- ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT,
- AssumptionCache *AC) {
+void llvm::simplifyLoopAfterUnroll(Loop *L, bool SimplifyIVs, LoopInfo *LI,
+ ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT,
+ AssumptionCache *AC) {
// Simplify any new induction variables in the partially unrolled loop.
if (SE && SimplifyIVs) {
SmallVector<WeakTrackingVH, 16> DeadInsts;
@@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ LoopUnrollResult llvm::UnrollLoop(
if (Force)
RuntimeTripCount = false;
else {
- LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Wont unroll; remainder loop could not be generated"
- "when assuming runtime trip count\n");
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Won't unroll; remainder loop could not be "
+ "generated when assuming runtime trip count\n");
return LoopUnrollResult::Unmodified;
}
}