aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>2023-04-27 11:36:21 +0200
committerNikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>2023-04-28 12:17:26 +0200
commit0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b (patch)
tree4cea585999bae56a5946d4fa399a8d1e1b07fa0b /llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
parent575fdea70a86f68b0d303a9a3273fc47f810628a (diff)
downloadllvm-0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b.zip
llvm-0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b.tar.gz
llvm-0aed0dbec2434d9d1a41266be009e56cc964633b.tar.bz2
[LCSSA] Don't invalidate entire loop in SCEV
We already invalidate each individual instruction for which LCSSA is formed in formLCSSAForInstructions(), so I don't see a reason why we would need to invalidate the entire loop on top of that. I believe we also no longer need the instruction-level invalidation now that SCEV looks through LCSSA phis, but I'll leave that for a separate patch, as it's less obvious. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149331
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp6
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
index af79dc4..4b006f5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp
@@ -395,12 +395,6 @@ bool llvm::formLCSSA(Loop &L, const DominatorTree &DT, const LoopInfo *LI,
IRBuilder<> Builder(L.getHeader()->getContext());
Changed = formLCSSAForInstructions(Worklist, DT, *LI, SE, Builder);
- // If we modified the code, remove any caches about the loop from SCEV to
- // avoid dangling entries.
- // FIXME: This is a big hammer, can we clear the cache more selectively?
- if (SE && Changed)
- SE->forgetLoop(&L);
-
assert(L.isLCSSAForm(DT));
return Changed;