aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>2022-02-25 11:30:01 +0100
committerNikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>2022-03-07 09:46:20 +0100
commitd1e880acaa6f096618fa09d18daf17b9300558fc (patch)
tree9818a467729da3154f6441ea9e3e7a38249d87d2 /llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp
parentef193a7a7c865254dfa726a07711423d2b5c69f7 (diff)
downloadllvm-d1e880acaa6f096618fa09d18daf17b9300558fc.zip
llvm-d1e880acaa6f096618fa09d18daf17b9300558fc.tar.gz
llvm-d1e880acaa6f096618fa09d18daf17b9300558fc.tar.bz2
[SCEV] Enable verification in LoopPM
Currently, we hardly ever actually run SCEV verification, even in tests with -verify-scev. This is because the NewPM LPM does not verify SCEV. The reason for this is that SCEV verification can actually change the result of subsequent SCEV queries, which means that you see different transformations depending on whether verification is enabled or not. To allow verification in the LPM, this limits verification to BECounts that have actually been cached. It will not calculate new BECounts. BackedgeTakenInfo::getExact() is still not entirely readonly, it still calls getUMinFromMismatchedTypes(). But I hope that this is not problematic in the same way. (This could be avoided by performing the umin in the other SCEV instance, but this would require duplicating some of the code.) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120551
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp
index 3238b88..d20d275 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopPassManager.cpp
@@ -309,12 +309,12 @@ PreservedAnalyses FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor::run(Function &F,
#ifndef NDEBUG
// LoopAnalysisResults should always be valid.
- // Note that we don't LAR.SE.verify() because that can change observed SE
- // queries. See PR44815.
if (VerifyDomInfo)
LAR.DT.verify();
if (VerifyLoopInfo)
LAR.LI.verify(LAR.DT);
+ if (VerifySCEV)
+ LAR.SE.verify();
if (LAR.MSSA && VerifyMemorySSA)
LAR.MSSA->verifyMemorySSA();
#endif