aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
committerChandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>2014-03-09 03:16:01 +0000
commitcdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c (patch)
tree4b7b22b5e5b9ee152848a85ca3a911566532ecef /llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
parentc980afc578f9c1af3b8916b4a503ea26ebaee018 (diff)
downloadllvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.zip
llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.tar.gz
llvm-cdf4788401afff02e12279fc1fded94d6180639c.tar.bz2
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp18
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
index 9178381..dcb4a95 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
@@ -1435,16 +1435,15 @@ bool JumpThreading::ThreadEdge(BasicBlock *BB,
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ++I) {
// Scan all uses of this instruction to see if it is used outside of its
// block, and if so, record them in UsesToRename.
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), E = I->use_end(); UI != E;
- ++UI) {
- Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
+ for (Use &U : I->uses()) {
+ Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
if (PHINode *UserPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User)) {
- if (UserPN->getIncomingBlock(UI) == BB)
+ if (UserPN->getIncomingBlock(U) == BB)
continue;
} else if (User->getParent() == BB)
continue;
- UsesToRename.push_back(&UI.getUse());
+ UsesToRename.push_back(&U);
}
// If there are no uses outside the block, we're done with this instruction.
@@ -1589,16 +1588,15 @@ bool JumpThreading::DuplicateCondBranchOnPHIIntoPred(BasicBlock *BB,
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ++I) {
// Scan all uses of this instruction to see if it is used outside of its
// block, and if so, record them in UsesToRename.
- for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), E = I->use_end(); UI != E;
- ++UI) {
- Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
+ for (Use &U : I->uses()) {
+ Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
if (PHINode *UserPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User)) {
- if (UserPN->getIncomingBlock(UI) == BB)
+ if (UserPN->getIncomingBlock(U) == BB)
continue;
} else if (User->getParent() == BB)
continue;
- UsesToRename.push_back(&UI.getUse());
+ UsesToRename.push_back(&U);
}
// If there are no uses outside the block, we're done with this instruction.