diff options
author | Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> | 2023-03-23 12:38:57 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> | 2023-03-23 12:45:40 -0700 |
commit | d10110a8a60137d430f7a75051d0794293982ef6 (patch) | |
tree | cfed222bc5f6301f553efb4c9b98ffd436ffadd6 /llvm/lib/TextAPI/TextStubV5.cpp | |
parent | e0361396c2281a108a36d186161ace1843925431 (diff) | |
download | llvm-d10110a8a60137d430f7a75051d0794293982ef6.zip llvm-d10110a8a60137d430f7a75051d0794293982ef6.tar.gz llvm-d10110a8a60137d430f7a75051d0794293982ef6.tar.bz2 |
[StackProtector] attribute __stack_chk_fail as NoReturn
When GCC added support for stack smashing protections, it was defined
that:
> This hook returns a CALL_EXPR that alerts the runtime that the stack
> protect guard variable has been modified. This expression should
> involve a call to a noreturn function.
> The default version of this hook invokes a function called
> ‘__stack_chk_fail’, taking no arguments.
Do so as well for __stack_smash_handler for OpenBSD.
Every libc implementation I could find has __stack_chk_fail marked
noreturn, or the implementation calls abort, exit, or panic (which
themselves are noreturn).
Glibc: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=debug/stack_chk_fail.c
Musl: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/env/__stack_chk_fail.c
Bionic: https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/refs/heads/master/libc/bionic/__stack_chk_fail.cpp
FreeBSD: https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/lib/libc/secure/stack_protector.c
OpenBSD: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/master/lib/libc/sys/stack_protector.c
NetBSD: https://github.com/NetBSD/src/blob/trunk/lib/libc/misc/stack_protector.c
Linux Kernel: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/panic.c
Apple: https://opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-1439.40.11/sys/OpenBSD/stack_protector.c.auto.html
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Stack-Smashing-Protection.html#Stack-Smashing-Protection
This will later help us diagnose functions that fall through to other
functions vs end in calls to functions that are noreturn.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146339
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/TextAPI/TextStubV5.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions