diff options
author | JF Bastien <jfb@google.com> | 2016-04-06 21:19:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | JF Bastien <jfb@google.com> | 2016-04-06 21:19:33 +0000 |
commit | 800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207 (patch) | |
tree | b7b4323ac6fb5b8737b63ed9efe8af168551dbf7 /llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp | |
parent | 31994e2eb670e03ec826002df0ae330db8e6c72c (diff) | |
download | llvm-800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207.zip llvm-800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207.tar.gz llvm-800f87a871282713fc5f41d00692b51b2ea6c207.tar.bz2 |
NFC: make AtomicOrdering an enum class
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp | 38 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp index 9c2f765..fcc9cc4 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp @@ -1209,13 +1209,13 @@ LoadInst::LoadInst(Value *Ptr, const Twine &Name, bool isVolatile, LoadInst::LoadInst(Type *Ty, Value *Ptr, const Twine &Name, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, Instruction *InsertBef) - : LoadInst(Ty, Ptr, Name, isVolatile, Align, NotAtomic, CrossThread, - InsertBef) {} + : LoadInst(Ty, Ptr, Name, isVolatile, Align, AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic, + CrossThread, InsertBef) {} LoadInst::LoadInst(Value *Ptr, const Twine &Name, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, BasicBlock *InsertAE) - : LoadInst(Ptr, Name, isVolatile, Align, NotAtomic, CrossThread, InsertAE) { -} + : LoadInst(Ptr, Name, isVolatile, Align, AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic, + CrossThread, InsertAE) {} LoadInst::LoadInst(Type *Ty, Value *Ptr, const Twine &Name, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, AtomicOrdering Order, @@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ LoadInst::LoadInst(Value *Ptr, const char *Name, Instruction *InsertBef) Load, Ptr, InsertBef) { setVolatile(false); setAlignment(0); - setAtomic(NotAtomic); + setAtomic(AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic); AssertOK(); if (Name && Name[0]) setName(Name); } @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ LoadInst::LoadInst(Value *Ptr, const char *Name, BasicBlock *InsertAE) Load, Ptr, InsertAE) { setVolatile(false); setAlignment(0); - setAtomic(NotAtomic); + setAtomic(AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic); AssertOK(); if (Name && Name[0]) setName(Name); } @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ LoadInst::LoadInst(Type *Ty, Value *Ptr, const char *Name, bool isVolatile, assert(Ty == cast<PointerType>(Ptr->getType())->getElementType()); setVolatile(isVolatile); setAlignment(0); - setAtomic(NotAtomic); + setAtomic(AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic); AssertOK(); if (Name && Name[0]) setName(Name); } @@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ LoadInst::LoadInst(Value *Ptr, const char *Name, bool isVolatile, Load, Ptr, InsertAE) { setVolatile(isVolatile); setAlignment(0); - setAtomic(NotAtomic); + setAtomic(AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic); AssertOK(); if (Name && Name[0]) setName(Name); } @@ -1324,13 +1324,13 @@ StoreInst::StoreInst(Value *val, Value *addr, bool isVolatile, StoreInst::StoreInst(Value *val, Value *addr, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, Instruction *InsertBefore) - : StoreInst(val, addr, isVolatile, Align, NotAtomic, CrossThread, - InsertBefore) {} + : StoreInst(val, addr, isVolatile, Align, AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic, + CrossThread, InsertBefore) {} StoreInst::StoreInst(Value *val, Value *addr, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, BasicBlock *InsertAtEnd) - : StoreInst(val, addr, isVolatile, Align, NotAtomic, CrossThread, - InsertAtEnd) {} + : StoreInst(val, addr, isVolatile, Align, AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic, + CrossThread, InsertAtEnd) {} StoreInst::StoreInst(Value *val, Value *addr, bool isVolatile, unsigned Align, AtomicOrdering Order, @@ -1398,13 +1398,15 @@ void AtomicCmpXchgInst::Init(Value *Ptr, Value *Cmp, Value *NewVal, assert(getOperand(2)->getType() == cast<PointerType>(getOperand(0)->getType())->getElementType() && "Ptr must be a pointer to NewVal type!"); - assert(SuccessOrdering != NotAtomic && + assert(SuccessOrdering != AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic && "AtomicCmpXchg instructions must be atomic!"); - assert(FailureOrdering != NotAtomic && + assert(FailureOrdering != AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic && "AtomicCmpXchg instructions must be atomic!"); - assert(SuccessOrdering >= FailureOrdering && - "AtomicCmpXchg success ordering must be at least as strong as fail"); - assert(FailureOrdering != Release && FailureOrdering != AcquireRelease && + assert(!isStrongerThan(FailureOrdering, SuccessOrdering) && + "AtomicCmpXchg failure argument shall be no stronger than the success " + "argument"); + assert(FailureOrdering != AtomicOrdering::Release && + FailureOrdering != AtomicOrdering::AcquireRelease && "AtomicCmpXchg failure ordering cannot include release semantics"); } @@ -1454,7 +1456,7 @@ void AtomicRMWInst::Init(BinOp Operation, Value *Ptr, Value *Val, assert(getOperand(1)->getType() == cast<PointerType>(getOperand(0)->getType())->getElementType() && "Ptr must be a pointer to Val type!"); - assert(Ordering != NotAtomic && + assert(Ordering != AtomicOrdering::NotAtomic && "AtomicRMW instructions must be atomic!"); } |