From Dan Gohman:

While preparing http://llvm.org/PR1198 I noticed several asserts
protecting unprepared code from i128 types that weren't actually failing
when they should because they were written as assert("foo") instead of
something like assert(0 && "foo"). This patch fixes all the cases that a
quick grep found.

llvm-svn: 34267

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/Execution.cpp b/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/Execution.cpp
index 936d64f44413..c6dcc5cbc030 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/Execution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Interpreter/Execution.cpp
@@ -1690,7 +1690,7 @@ void Interpreter::visitVAArgInst(VAArgInst &I) {
       else if (BitWidth <= 64)
         Dest.Int64Val = Src.Int64Val;
       else
-        assert("Integer types > 64 bits not supported");
+        assert(0 && "Integer types > 64 bits not supported");
       maskToBitWidth(Dest, BitWidth);
     }
     IMPLEMENT_VAARG(Pointer);