[NFC] Fix semantic discrepancy for MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103251

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
index 7319753..f4e3fad 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
@@ -1279,11 +1279,11 @@ TargetLoweringBase::findRepresentativeClass(const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI,
 /// this allows us to compute derived properties we expose.
 void TargetLoweringBase::computeRegisterProperties(
     const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI) {
-  static_assert(MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE <= MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE,
+  static_assert(MVT::VALUETYPE_SIZE <= MVT::MAX_ALLOWED_VALUETYPE,
                 "Too many value types for ValueTypeActions to hold!");
 
   // Everything defaults to needing one register.
-  for (unsigned i = 0; i != MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE; ++i) {
+  for (unsigned i = 0; i != MVT::VALUETYPE_SIZE; ++i) {
     NumRegistersForVT[i] = 1;
     RegisterTypeForVT[i] = TransformToType[i] = (MVT::SimpleValueType)i;
   }
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ void TargetLoweringBase::computeRegisterProperties(
   // not a sub-register class / subreg register class) legal register class for
   // a group of value types. For example, on i386, i8, i16, and i32
   // representative would be GR32; while on x86_64 it's GR64.
-  for (unsigned i = 0; i != MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE; ++i) {
+  for (unsigned i = 0; i != MVT::VALUETYPE_SIZE; ++i) {
     const TargetRegisterClass* RRC;
     uint8_t Cost;
     std::tie(RRC, Cost) = findRepresentativeClass(TRI, (MVT::SimpleValueType)i);