[InstrRef] Fix mismatch between LiveDebugValues and salvageCopySSA (#124233)

The LiveDebugValues pass and the instruction selector (which calls
salvageCopySSA) need to be consistent on what they consider a copy
instruction. With https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75184, the
definition of what a copy instruction is was narrowed for AArch64 to
exclude a w->x ORR and treat it as a zero-extend rather than a copy

However, to make sure LiveDebugValues still treats a w->x ORR as a copy,
the new function, isCopyLikeInstr was created. We need to make sure that
salvageCopySSA also calls that function.

This patch addresses this mismatch.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
index ab3609b..7d504ef 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineFunction.cpp
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ auto MachineFunction::salvageCopySSA(
   // Check whether this copy-like instruction has already been salvaged into
   // an operand pair.
   Register Dest;
-  if (auto CopyDstSrc = TII.isCopyInstr(MI)) {
+  if (auto CopyDstSrc = TII.isCopyLikeInstr(MI)) {
     Dest = CopyDstSrc->Destination->getReg();
   } else {
     assert(MI.isSubregToReg());
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ auto MachineFunction::salvageCopySSAImpl(MachineInstr &MI)
     CurInst = Inst.getIterator();
 
     // Any non-copy instruction is the defining instruction we're seeking.
-    if (!Inst.isCopyLike() && !TII.isCopyInstr(Inst))
+    if (!Inst.isCopyLike() && !TII.isCopyLikeInstr(Inst))
       break;
     State = GetRegAndSubreg(Inst);
   };