diff options
author | Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> | 2019-08-14 12:20:02 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeremy Morse <jeremy.morse.llvm@gmail.com> | 2019-08-14 12:20:02 +0000 |
commit | 90c2794bfc337338b4e4ec8421c75735e7207e6e (patch) | |
tree | e6660a22e5ee093dbf515355ced01d0d20effd0c /llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp | |
parent | 9fa2599e9b9cb6fd6bda81f7e3c0d70e7cbad3c6 (diff) | |
download | llvm-90c2794bfc337338b4e4ec8421c75735e7207e6e.zip llvm-90c2794bfc337338b4e4ec8421c75735e7207e6e.tar.gz llvm-90c2794bfc337338b4e4ec8421c75735e7207e6e.tar.bz2 |
[DebugInfo] MCP: collect and update DBG_VALUEs encountered in local block
MCP currently uses changeDebugValuesDefReg / collectDebugValues to find
debug users of a register, however those functions assume that all
DBG_VALUEs immediately follow the specified instruction, which isn't
necessarily true. This is going to become very often untrue when we turn
off CodeGenPrepare::placeDbgValues.
Instead of calling changeDebugValuesDefReg on an instruction to change its
debug users, in this patch we instead collect DBG_VALUEs of copies as we
iterate over insns, and update the debug users of copies that are made
dead. This isn't a non-functional change, because MCP will now update
DBG_VALUEs that aren't immediately after a copy, but refer to the same
register. I've hijacked the regression test for PR38773 to test for this
new behaviour, an entirely new test seemed overkill.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56265
llvm-svn: 368835
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp | 38 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp index 1df98fc..f3946b8 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineCopyPropagation.cpp @@ -205,8 +205,11 @@ public: } private: + typedef enum { DebugUse = false, RegularUse = true } DebugType; + void ClobberRegister(unsigned Reg); - void ReadRegister(unsigned Reg); + void ReadRegister(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr &Reader, + DebugType DT); void CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB); bool eraseIfRedundant(MachineInstr &Copy, unsigned Src, unsigned Def); void forwardUses(MachineInstr &MI); @@ -217,6 +220,9 @@ private: /// Candidates for deletion. SmallSetVector<MachineInstr *, 8> MaybeDeadCopies; + /// Multimap tracking debug users in current BB + DenseMap<MachineInstr*, SmallVector<MachineInstr*, 2>> CopyDbgUsers; + CopyTracker Tracker; bool Changed; @@ -231,13 +237,19 @@ char &llvm::MachineCopyPropagationID = MachineCopyPropagation::ID; INITIALIZE_PASS(MachineCopyPropagation, DEBUG_TYPE, "Machine Copy Propagation Pass", false, false) -void MachineCopyPropagation::ReadRegister(unsigned Reg) { +void MachineCopyPropagation::ReadRegister(unsigned Reg, MachineInstr &Reader, + DebugType DT) { // If 'Reg' is defined by a copy, the copy is no longer a candidate - // for elimination. + // for elimination. If a copy is "read" by a debug user, record the user + // for propagation. for (MCRegUnitIterator RUI(Reg, TRI); RUI.isValid(); ++RUI) { if (MachineInstr *Copy = Tracker.findCopyForUnit(*RUI, *TRI)) { - LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "MCP: Copy is used - not dead: "; Copy->dump()); - MaybeDeadCopies.remove(Copy); + if (DT == RegularUse) { + LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "MCP: Copy is used - not dead: "; Copy->dump()); + MaybeDeadCopies.remove(Copy); + } else { + CopyDbgUsers[Copy].push_back(&Reader); + } } } } @@ -488,14 +500,14 @@ void MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { // If Src is defined by a previous copy, the previous copy cannot be // eliminated. - ReadRegister(Src); + ReadRegister(Src, *MI, RegularUse); for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI->implicit_operands()) { if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.readsReg()) continue; unsigned Reg = MO.getReg(); if (!Reg) continue; - ReadRegister(Reg); + ReadRegister(Reg, *MI, RegularUse); } LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "MCP: Copy is a deletion candidate: "; MI->dump()); @@ -534,7 +546,7 @@ void MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { // instruction, so we need to make sure we don't remove it as dead // later. if (MO.isTied()) - ReadRegister(Reg); + ReadRegister(Reg, *MI, RegularUse); Tracker.clobberRegister(Reg, *TRI); } @@ -558,8 +570,8 @@ void MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { if (MO.isDef() && !MO.isEarlyClobber()) { Defs.push_back(Reg); continue; - } else if (!MO.isDebug() && MO.readsReg()) - ReadRegister(Reg); + } else if (MO.readsReg()) + ReadRegister(Reg, *MI, MO.isDebug() ? DebugUse : RegularUse); } // The instruction has a register mask operand which means that it clobbers @@ -609,9 +621,10 @@ void MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { MaybeDead->dump()); assert(!MRI->isReserved(MaybeDead->getOperand(0).getReg())); - // Update matching debug values. + // Update matching debug values, if any. assert(MaybeDead->isCopy()); - MaybeDead->changeDebugValuesDefReg(MaybeDead->getOperand(1).getReg()); + unsigned SrcReg = MaybeDead->getOperand(1).getReg(); + MRI->updateDbgUsersToReg(SrcReg, CopyDbgUsers[MaybeDead]); MaybeDead->eraseFromParent(); Changed = true; @@ -620,6 +633,7 @@ void MachineCopyPropagation::CopyPropagateBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) { } MaybeDeadCopies.clear(); + CopyDbgUsers.clear(); Tracker.clear(); } |