diff options
author | OCHyams <orlando.hyams@sony.com> | 2023-04-26 11:15:37 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | OCHyams <orlando.hyams@sony.com> | 2023-04-26 11:24:31 +0100 |
commit | ac6e177ce60efdd688e0823389cd167f931437bd (patch) | |
tree | 03b1fbf771ed7530116d68967ee6bbc845d01a8d /llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp | |
parent | de7bfec8850ee402493d8386225129dd5ef33b5c (diff) | |
download | llvm-ac6e177ce60efdd688e0823389cd167f931437bd.zip llvm-ac6e177ce60efdd688e0823389cd167f931437bd.tar.gz llvm-ac6e177ce60efdd688e0823389cd167f931437bd.tar.bz2 |
[Assignment Tracking] Remove overly defensive AllocaInst assertion
Remove assert from AssignmentTrackingAnalysis that fires if a local variable
has non-alloca storage. The analysis can emit these locations but the
assignment tracking code in SelectionDAG isn't ready to handle non-alloca
storage for locals yet. The AssignmentTrackingPass (pass that adds assignment
tracking metadata) ignores non-alloca dbg.declares, so the only variables
affected are those who's backing storage is changed from an alloca during
optimisation, and the result is the variables are dropped.
Fixes: https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/pigweed/builders/toolchain/
toolchain-ci-pigweed-linux/b8783274592206481489/overview
Reviewed By: StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149135
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp index d5e133d..5ef850d 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AssignmentTrackingAnalysis.cpp @@ -2194,8 +2194,7 @@ bool AssignmentTrackingLowering::run(FunctionVarLocsBuilder *FnVarLocsBuilder) { // // Unless we've already done so, create the single location def now. if (AlwaysStackHomed.insert(Aggr).second) { - assert(!VarLoc.Values.hasArgList() && - isa<AllocaInst>(VarLoc.Values.getVariableLocationOp(0))); + assert(!VarLoc.Values.hasArgList()); // TODO: When more complex cases are handled VarLoc.Expr should be // built appropriately rather than always using an empty DIExpression. // The assert below is a reminder. |