DWARF v5: emit DW_AT_addr_base if DW_AT_low_pc references .debug_addr

The condition !AddrPool.empty() is tested before attachRangesOrLowHighPC(), which may add an entry to AddrPool. We emit DW_AT_low_pc (DW_FORM_addrx) but may incorrectly omit DW_AT_addr_base for LineTablesOnly. This can be easily reproduced:

clang -gdwarf-5 -gmlt -c a.cc

Fix this by moving !AddrPool.empty() below.

This was discovered while investigating an lld crash (fixed by D61889) on such object files: ld.lld --gdb-index a.o

Reviewed By: probinson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61891

llvm-svn: 360678

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
index a6b6fbf..070b1b6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
@@ -901,13 +901,6 @@ void DwarfDebug::finalizeModuleInfo() {
     // ranges for all subprogram DIEs for mach-o.
     DwarfCompileUnit &U = SkCU ? *SkCU : TheCU;
 
-    // We don't keep track of which addresses are used in which CU so this
-    // is a bit pessimistic under LTO.
-    if (!AddrPool.isEmpty() &&
-        (getDwarfVersion() >= 5 ||
-         (SkCU && !empty(TheCU.getUnitDie().children()))))
-      U.addAddrTableBase();
-
     if (unsigned NumRanges = TheCU.getRanges().size()) {
       if (NumRanges > 1 && useRangesSection())
         // A DW_AT_low_pc attribute may also be specified in combination with
@@ -920,6 +913,13 @@ void DwarfDebug::finalizeModuleInfo() {
       U.attachRangesOrLowHighPC(U.getUnitDie(), TheCU.takeRanges());
     }
 
+    // We don't keep track of which addresses are used in which CU so this
+    // is a bit pessimistic under LTO.
+    if (!AddrPool.isEmpty() &&
+        (getDwarfVersion() >= 5 ||
+         (SkCU && !empty(TheCU.getUnitDie().children()))))
+      U.addAddrTableBase();
+
     if (getDwarfVersion() >= 5) {
       if (U.hasRangeLists())
         U.addRnglistsBase();