[X86][FastISel] During X86 fastisel, the address of indirect call was resolved

through bitcast, ptrtoint, and inttoptr instructions. This is valid
only if the related instructions are in that same basic block, otherwise
we may reference variables that were not live accross basic blocks
resulting in undefined virtual registers.

The bug was exposed when both SDISel and FastISel were used within the same
function, i.e., one basic block is issued with FastISel and another with SDISel,
as demonstrated with the testcase.

<rdar://problem/15192473>

llvm-svn: 192636

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions