diff options
author | Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com> | 2020-12-28 08:32:45 +0900 |
---|---|---|
committer | Juneyoung Lee <aqjune@gmail.com> | 2020-12-28 08:32:45 +0900 |
commit | 860199dfbe60d78a7da6406622b635a2d4435db3 (patch) | |
tree | f0634ee12dd0bf5edfb194e3d183473d1045cc2a /llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp | |
parent | 4ad41902e8c7481ccf3cdf6e618dfcd1e1fc10fc (diff) | |
download | llvm-860199dfbe60d78a7da6406622b635a2d4435db3.zip llvm-860199dfbe60d78a7da6406622b635a2d4435db3.tar.gz llvm-860199dfbe60d78a7da6406622b635a2d4435db3.tar.bz2 |
[ValueTracking] Use m_LogicalAnd/Or to look into conditions
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp | 46 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp index 2909180..25f6be2 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp @@ -2131,13 +2131,12 @@ static bool isKnownNonNullFromDominatingCondition(const Value *V, // correct to assume that all conditions of AND are met in true branch. // TODO: Support similar logic of OR and EQ predicate? if (NonNullIfTrue) - if (auto *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Curr)) - if (BO->getOpcode() == Instruction::And) { - for (auto *BOU : BO->users()) - if (Visited.insert(BOU).second) - WorkList.push_back(BOU); - continue; - } + if (match(Curr, m_LogicalAnd(m_Value(), m_Value()))) { + for (auto *CurrU : Curr->users()) + if (Visited.insert(CurrU).second) + WorkList.push_back(CurrU); + continue; + } if (const BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(Curr)) { assert(BI->isConditional() && "uses a comparison!"); @@ -6156,25 +6155,25 @@ static Optional<bool> isImpliedCondICmps(const ICmpInst *LHS, /// Return true if LHS implies RHS is true. Return false if LHS implies RHS is /// false. Otherwise, return None if we can't infer anything. We expect the -/// RHS to be an icmp and the LHS to be an 'and' or an 'or' instruction. +/// RHS to be an icmp and the LHS to be an 'and', 'or', or a 'select' instruction. static Optional<bool> -isImpliedCondAndOr(const BinaryOperator *LHS, CmpInst::Predicate RHSPred, +isImpliedCondAndOr(const Instruction *LHS, CmpInst::Predicate RHSPred, const Value *RHSOp0, const Value *RHSOp1, - const DataLayout &DL, bool LHSIsTrue, unsigned Depth) { - // The LHS must be an 'or' or an 'and' instruction. + // The LHS must be an 'or', 'and', or a 'select' instruction. assert((LHS->getOpcode() == Instruction::And || - LHS->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or) && - "Expected LHS to be 'and' or 'or'."); + LHS->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or || + LHS->getOpcode() == Instruction::Select) && + "Expected LHS to be 'and', 'or', or 'select'."); assert(Depth <= MaxAnalysisRecursionDepth && "Hit recursion limit"); // If the result of an 'or' is false, then we know both legs of the 'or' are // false. Similarly, if the result of an 'and' is true, then we know both // legs of the 'and' are true. - Value *ALHS, *ARHS; - if ((!LHSIsTrue && match(LHS, m_Or(m_Value(ALHS), m_Value(ARHS)))) || - (LHSIsTrue && match(LHS, m_And(m_Value(ALHS), m_Value(ARHS))))) { + const Value *ALHS, *ARHS; + if ((!LHSIsTrue && match(LHS, m_LogicalOr(m_Value(ALHS), m_Value(ARHS)))) || + (LHSIsTrue && match(LHS, m_LogicalAnd(m_Value(ALHS), m_Value(ARHS))))) { // FIXME: Make this non-recursion. if (Optional<bool> Implication = isImpliedCondition( ALHS, RHSPred, RHSOp0, RHSOp1, DL, LHSIsTrue, Depth + 1)) @@ -6215,13 +6214,14 @@ llvm::isImpliedCondition(const Value *LHS, CmpInst::Predicate RHSPred, return isImpliedCondICmps(LHSCmp, RHSPred, RHSOp0, RHSOp1, DL, LHSIsTrue, Depth); - /// The LHS should be an 'or' or an 'and' instruction. We expect the RHS to - /// be / an icmp. FIXME: Add support for and/or on the RHS. - const BinaryOperator *LHSBO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS); - if (LHSBO) { - if ((LHSBO->getOpcode() == Instruction::And || - LHSBO->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or)) - return isImpliedCondAndOr(LHSBO, RHSPred, RHSOp0, RHSOp1, DL, LHSIsTrue, + /// The LHS should be an 'or', 'and', or a 'select' instruction. We expect + /// the RHS to be an icmp. + /// FIXME: Add support for and/or/select on the RHS. + if (const Instruction *LHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(LHS)) { + if ((LHSI->getOpcode() == Instruction::And || + LHSI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Or || + LHSI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Select)) + return isImpliedCondAndOr(LHSI, RHSPred, RHSOp0, RHSOp1, DL, LHSIsTrue, Depth); } return None; |