aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYingwei Zheng <dtcxzyw2333@gmail.com>2025-04-30 11:53:38 +0800
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2025-04-30 11:53:38 +0800
commit830cf36bd4c491ef28d9bba74737e324639bb4cd (patch)
tree17fecbe6ab0f5223fb572a9a243b2ecbd22666e2 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
parent4075a3698a3fdda3a77ce2456e3bfefbc0f0c56e (diff)
downloadllvm-830cf36bd4c491ef28d9bba74737e324639bb4cd.zip
llvm-830cf36bd4c491ef28d9bba74737e324639bb4cd.tar.gz
llvm-830cf36bd4c491ef28d9bba74737e324639bb4cd.tar.bz2
[LVI][ValueTracking] Take UB-implying attributes into account in `isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute` (#137604)
Closes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/137582. In the original case, LVI uses the edge information in `%entry -> %if.end` to get a more precise result. However, since the call to `smin` has an `noundef` return attribute, an immediate UB will be triggered after optimization. Currently, `isSafeToSpeculativelyExecuteWithOpcode(%min)` returns true because https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6a288c1e32351d4be3b7630841af078fa1c3bb8b only checks whether the function is speculatable. However, it is not enough in this case. This patch takes UB-implying attributes into account if `IgnoreUBImplyingAttrs` is set to false. If it is set to true, the caller is responsible for correctly propagating UB-implying attributes.
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp21
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
index 1d3f8b7..256e77b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp
@@ -7201,20 +7201,19 @@ bool llvm::isNotCrossLaneOperation(const Instruction *I) {
!isa<CallBase, BitCastInst, ExtractElementInst>(I);
}
-bool llvm::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(const Instruction *Inst,
- const Instruction *CtxI,
- AssumptionCache *AC,
- const DominatorTree *DT,
- const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,
- bool UseVariableInfo) {
+bool llvm::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(
+ const Instruction *Inst, const Instruction *CtxI, AssumptionCache *AC,
+ const DominatorTree *DT, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, bool UseVariableInfo,
+ bool IgnoreUBImplyingAttrs) {
return isSafeToSpeculativelyExecuteWithOpcode(Inst->getOpcode(), Inst, CtxI,
- AC, DT, TLI, UseVariableInfo);
+ AC, DT, TLI, UseVariableInfo,
+ IgnoreUBImplyingAttrs);
}
bool llvm::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecuteWithOpcode(
unsigned Opcode, const Instruction *Inst, const Instruction *CtxI,
AssumptionCache *AC, const DominatorTree *DT, const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI,
- bool UseVariableInfo) {
+ bool UseVariableInfo, bool IgnoreUBImplyingAttrs) {
#ifndef NDEBUG
if (Inst->getOpcode() != Opcode) {
// Check that the operands are actually compatible with the Opcode override.
@@ -7287,7 +7286,11 @@ bool llvm::isSafeToSpeculativelyExecuteWithOpcode(
// The called function could have undefined behavior or side-effects, even
// if marked readnone nounwind.
- return Callee && Callee->isSpeculatable();
+ if (!Callee || !Callee->isSpeculatable())
+ return false;
+ // Since the operands may be changed after hoisting, undefined behavior may
+ // be triggered by some UB-implying attributes.
+ return IgnoreUBImplyingAttrs || !CI->hasUBImplyingAttrs();
}
case Instruction::VAArg:
case Instruction::Alloca: